Oh MAN…
More From This Trip


As I mentioned previously, I’m currently on a trip with one of my best friends, Matt. We’re planning the trip day-by-day, which means I’ll be writing the trip report more or less live. Matt will be sharing his thoughts as we go along as well — here’s his fifth installment.

Guten tag from Berlin.  After an amazing stay in Stockholm we jumped on an airberlin flight to Berlin for a few days.  But as far as my review goes, we’re still in Manchester!  We stayed in the Hilton Manchester Deansgate, which is the tallest and most iconic building in the city.  Ben will be reviewing it very shortly, so I won’t go into much detail on the hotel experience and instead will focus on Manchester itself and the MAN airport experience, which was a painful yet comedic experience, or something like that.

Manchester-5

Manchester itself is a very cute city that has a somewhat “small town” feel.  Given that Emirates has thrice daily service (two on an A380), and that Etihad and Qatar have two daily flights, I have to wonder where all the people go!  One of the nicest aspects of Manchester was the weather!  After Dubai, there was nothing I wanted more than to walk outside without feeling like I was three inches from the sun.  You might think of the UK as being dreary, but the slight bit of rain and 65 degree weather was very very welcomed after the 110+ degree weather in Dubai.  It’s also very easy to walk around the Deansgate area, which was also a pleasant change of pace after sprawling Dubai.

Manchester-1

We had lounge access the second day at the Hilton, and the views were quite nice.

Manchester-2
Manchester Cathedral 

Manchester-3

Manchester also has a number of scenic canals running through it.  I tried to capture a few of them, but I’m not a very good photographer so you’ll have to forgive me and visit the city yourself to understand what I am really talking about.

Manchester-4
Canals in Manchester 

Manchester-6
Canals in Manchester 

Manchester-7
A boat named Tug! 

Because we had just arrived on EK17 and were a bit tired still from having been up for what felt like a week, we slept for a good amount of time upon arrival.  Worry not, however.  We had classic UK cuisine — Indian.  And we went out to a bar.  A proper bar.  The Cock! 

Manchester-10
Only in the UK would this be appropriate

Overall, I enjoyed my brief stay in Manchester.  It’s a charming city.  I would return not so much to see Manchester proper, but to go to the lakes district nearby, which I’ve heard is absolutely amazing.  So far this review has been nothing but complimentary, so I’ve got to change that by discussing my Manchester airport security experience.  Three letters: W. T. F.

At this point in the trip I had been through security at LAX, SAV (visiting my parents in Hilton Head, SC), DFW, and DXB.  With the exception of SAV, each of these airports is substantially larger than MAN.  I had no issue going through security in any of the cities.  (In fairness, I had TSA PreCheck at each of the US cities.)  Manchester, however, takes the whole only 100 ml or less liquids in a one quart (or something like that) size clear bag laughably seriously.  I had my toiletries in Swiss and Singapore first class amenity kits, as one does, but that of course wouldn’t do.  They needed to be separately placed in a single clear bag that had to seal completely.  I don’t fly as much as Ben, but I put in a substantial amount of flying both domestically and internationally every year, and I haven’t been asked to do this anywhere in at least the past five years.  I did it, leaving some things out because they wouldn’t fit, assuming, as is the case, that they wouldn’t really care.  Oops.  They cared.

My personal item got flagged, and the agent called me over for a search of my bag.  He took out my moisturizer and said that it was too big.  125 ml.  Surely that .25 liter excess was enough to raise serious safety flags.  I was also forced to throw away sunscreen, shampoo, conditioner, and hair styling products.  Not because the bottles were too big, but because they wouldn’t fit in the bag.  Funny enough, in the bag with everything else was my 150 ml face cleanser.  That was no big deal though, apparently.  Go figure.  I also had to purge the contents of my Emirates amenity kits.  Those were going to be part of a contest on the blog, but instead some dude in Manchester is walking around with what would have been a blog reader’s amenities.  And to think, America declared independence centuries ago!  The best part, however, was that my other bag went through with oversize hand cream, cologne that wouldn’t have fit into my clear bag, toothpaste, and shaving cream.  It’s one thing to be a stickler and get things right.  It’s another thing to be comically strict with respect to some things but then fail to actually screen adequately overall.  I wonder if I had just left all the toiletries in my bag if they’d have even noticed.  And listening to other peoples’ experiences, I was no exception.  There should be a “Come Fly With Me” episode dedicated to MAN security.  It was a joke.

I did eventually make it, and our quick BA flight to LHR went as expected.  About 20 minutes in the air to London, and 25-30 minutes in a holding pattern waiting to land at LHR.  The best part, however, was the Galleries First Lounge at LHR.  I was impressed by the fact that they served 2006 Taittinger and Taittinger NV rose (which I prefer to the brut, even vintage).  It’s somewhat common to see Taittinger in BA lounges, but that makes me wonder why the serve Grand Siecle over Taittinger’s tete de cuvee Comtes de Champagne.  There’s some things in life that are simply inexplicable, I guess!

Manchester-8
British Airways Galleries First Champagne — Taittinger 

The lounge attendant told us that our flight to Stockholm was “on time, which [was] remarkable.”  (Gotta love his confidence in LHR Terminal 5 / BA.)  He was a little wrong, however, as the aircraft boarded slightly late.  I adored Stockholm, and have a great story to share regarding the Arlanda Express train (from the airport to Stockholm).

Manchester-9
BA 777

Stay tuned!

Conversations (45)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

A Whyborn Guest

Used to live up near the lake district, flew several times out of manchester for my travels... Security at manchester is actually a pain in the backside, it's just awful, especially for me who carries lots of electronics around. They always flagged both pieces of my luggage, always. Eventually I gave up and started flying out of glasgow instead, mostly because of the security, but I also couldn't resist picking up lovely bottles of scotch...

0
‼ 0
A Heathrow Security Officer Guest

I have been reading the comments about the liquid rules and how strict and anal it can be and decided to throw in my 2 cents worth. I work in Heathrow security and would like to put this into perspective from the other side's point of view. I cannot comment on other airports but.... The CAA issues the rules, our job is to make sure that they are followed. We are here to make sure a passenger's expectation of reaching his/her destination is achieved. Unfortunately, we, as security officers, are stuck between a rock and a hard place. We have to offer customer service to passengers and are also appointed as the ones to take things off passengers if they do not comply. Not a very good position to be in to be honest. The 100ml rule has been in force ever since some nut decided to try to blow a plane up with chemical explosives in a soda bottle and unfortunately, if you are not well informed of the rules of air travel, I do have empathy. You say 125ml is hardly anything and should be allowed, why not 130ml or 140 ml? where do we stop? Regarding plastic bags , again a CAA rule, we have to follow it. Why should they be out of your case? The software on the xray machines will pick up liquids and if the density of these liquids is suspect, it will mark it up to the screen reader for testing. Alas, the CAA imposes a full bag search if the bag has to be opened to access the liquids for testing. Wouldn't it be easier if the liquids were out of the hand luggage to make testing quicker and easier if necessary? Regarding baby liquids: yes you are allowed oversized liquids, and they will be rejected for testing if the software finds the density too close to other dangerous chemical compounds. Technology gets better all the time and it does make things easier for screening as well as for the passenger. It used to be that any baby food (jars) had to be tested the old fashioned way, you have 6 jars? Open three and eat some!! Thank God thats in the past, also applied to breast milk! At least now we have the tech to test without having to open the containers. If you look up on TSA efficiency regarding detection of threats, use google, you will see that 95% of airports tested, unfortunately failed!! Heads rolled and hopefully things get better. The TSA have one BIG advantage over Heathrow security, they are government employees and as such do not put much emphasis into making sure the passenger enjoys (or at least does not get stressed) the passage through security screening.(less stress for the TSA employees) Processes are constantly updated but security is about people, and they make mistakes. You might encounter a security officer who is the most helpful in getting you through (if you do, it would be nice to let their supervisor know, as it is usually the complaints that tend to reach supervisors) or you might get the one who has had a bad day and can't wait to take it out on someone. No one is perfect. We see this from our side as well, some passengers make your day while others (especially the ones who think they are above it all), just like to complain or throw a fit. Again, we have to consider that those passengers may be going through a lot of problems of their own. Human nature... Just a small definition of the 100ml rule, it is anythig that is a liquid, gel, cream or paste in a container that has a greater capacity than 100ml. It is not the amount inside the container, but the container capacity that is looked at. Regarding what is confiscated off passengers, it gets destroyed, not even the charities get anything out of it. That includes liquids, ammunition, swords, guns, kitchen knives.... and surprisingly, most of the dangerous items confiscated, are taken off transiting passengers (which explains why you have to go through security twice). Not all airports are perfect, nor are the people working there or the passengers travelling through. The bottom line in all of this is that security is there for your safety, there are set rules that we have to follow and unfortunately, that might lead to some liquids being disposed of. That's why I never stress about security when I am a passenger, I know why they are there, I know what I have to do to comply and I know this is inevitable and can't see any change to the experience in the foreseeable future. If anyone asked me where I would prefer flying from, I would say the United Kingdom BECAUSE of them being anal and thorough. If there was no security at the airport, how many of the people complaining about security would fly?

1
‼ 0
Lumma Guest

The worst part of this article seems to suggest that you think that because you travel 1st class you think you should be exempt from following the law. The liquid law is stupid but the fact you have emirates amenity kits doesn't make you above the law

0
‼ 0
George New Member

So the Brits are anal retentive. In other news, Ferdinand Magellan sailed around the world today. I am sorry Matt, I don't mean to be sarcastic towards you, as an ex-London based FT, I am fed up with their security AND rude immigration officers and I avoid their airports like the black plague. Good to hear you will be doing the same. It will save you from a few white hairs.

0
‼ 0
srptraveller Guest

@peteukmcr, I am with you they are doing their job, but the idea that much of what is done by the security screeners at MAN has anything to do with OUR safety is so far wide of the mark it's funny. I took two litres of "baby food" through there last week. I didn't have to put it in the silly plastic bag because the rules don't require it. It got the same screening as the things that we did put in the silly plastic bag. The screener guessed it was baby food because it was white liquid and I had a baby. It could have been anything. What did the lack of plastic bag change? If I was a terrorist and the only thing preventing me from blowing us all up was the silly plastic bag, I would just take a baby with me and avoid the silly plastic bag altogether.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
More From This Trip