American Airlines Abandons Seattle Long Haul Flights

While American Airlines had already suspended international service out of Seattle, it looks like this isn’t just temporary. Has American had a bad strategy in Seattle, or just bad luck?

American’s Seattle international gateway aspirations

Prior to 2020, American spent years growing its long haul service out of Los Angeles (LAX), as the airline was increasingly making that its transpacific gateway. Those plans changed in early 2020, when American announced it would launch long haul flights out of Seattle:

  • American announced it would strengthen its relationship with Alaska Airlines, which would also join the oneworld alliance
  • American planned to start operating long haul flights out of Seattle, with the first three destinations being Bangalore (BLR), London (LHR), and Shanghai (PVG); other destinations were planned beyond that

The timing for this announcement wasn’t exactly great. American revealed these plans in February 2020, and then a few weeks later the world shut down:

  • The London service launched as of March 2021, but was suspended for the winter 2023/2024 season
  • The Bangalore service was supposed to launch in October 2020, but has since been scrapped; this was first due to lack of demand due to borders being closed, and now due to the closure of Russian airspace to US airlines, which makes this route even more challenging
  • The Shanghai service was supposed to launch in March 2021, but has been postponed indefinitely

As you can tell, American’s international “hub” in Seattle hasn’t actually amounted to a whole lot. It has just consisted of one daily flight to London. But even that isn’t operating this winter.

American planned to make Seattle a long haul hub

American cancels Seattle to London route

In April 2023, American updated its schedule to reflect that the Seattle to London flight would be suspended for the winter 2023/2024 season. This was just supposed to be a temporary suspension just for the season, but that’s no longer the case.

As flagged by @IshrionA, this route has now completely been removed from American’s schedule, so American no longer has plans to operate this route. Previously, the plan was for this to resume as of the summer 2024 season.

Practically speaking, the implications of this one route being cut aren’t huge. American and British Airways have a transatlantic joint venture, and British Airways will continue to operate the route. Given the revenue sharing agreement and reciprocal perks between the two airlines, this isn’t that major, aside from avoiding fuel surcharges on award tickets, or being able to waitlist systemwide upgrades.

However, bigger picture, it reflects that American has completely given up on its Seattle long haul flight strategy.

British Airways will continue operating the Seattle to London route

Did American have a bad strategy or bad luck?

Is American fully retreating from its Seattle long haul service a sign of bad strategy or bad luck?

American has definitely had bad luck, given that these plans were announced just a few weeks before the pandemic shut down global travel. The Shanghai service wasn’t practical due to travel restrictions, and the Bangalore service wasn’t practical due to Russian airspace closure.

Meanwhile I think the London service just probably hasn’t proven as lucrative for American as planned for a few reasons:

  • American doesn’t have much brand recognition, loyalty, or corporate contracts, in Seattle; broadly speaking, the more long haul flights you operate out of a city, the better you’ll do filling each plane with decent yields
  • While leisure travel demand has come back quite strong since the start of the pandemic, pure business demand just hasn’t fully recovered; I get the strong sense that the Seattle hub was based on the assumption that there would be pre-pandemic business demand (given the companies based in Seattle), and that hasn’t materialized
  • Seattle has become an increasingly competitive market, and at a minimum, there are aspects of Delta’s hub there that aren’t performing well

So I don’t really judge American for discontinuing the London route, in the sense that I think bad luck is largely to blame.

Has American had a bad strategy, though? Well, I’d say that more accurately, American has had no real strategy when it comes to its international network. American has a robust domestic network that’s all about Charlotte, Dallas, and Phoenix.

Meanwhile American’s long haul network strategy seems to be both conservative and random — the airline tries stuff and sees what sticks. Unfortunately not a whole lot “sticks,” aside from London and summer leisure demand across the Atlantic.

American seemed to first have the strategy of growing out of Seattle in partnership with Alaska. Then the airline seemed to be more focused on growing out of New York in partnership with JetBlue. However, that partnership has ended, due to the DOJ suing to block the Northeast Alliance.

Now American has no “real” long haul hub west of Dallas. Sure, American has Los Angeles, but it’s a market where American has retreated quite a bit, and long haul service is primarily to some joint venture hubs, like London, Sydney, and Tokyo.

American’s long haul strategy is lacking

Bottom line

American Airlines seems to have permanently cut its planned long haul service out of Seattle. The airline never launched Bangalore and Shanghai flights, and has now axed the London service beyond just a seasonal suspension.

What do you make of American’s Seattle strategy? Do you think the airline has given up on Seattle, or will see eventually see this international hub plan happen?

Conversations (68)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Joe Norman Guest

American has a long history of inconsistency in Seattle, and we Seattle flyers know it. Moreover, flyers in general also know that American service quality has declined since the America West and US Air mergers. Seattle is a major hub for Alaska and Delta and also has the usual European and Asian carriers providing international service. So, no need for a mediocre, inconsistent, barely committed additional carrier.

0
‼ 0
Douglas Guest

The bigger issue was that most people out here in Seattle are either Alaska or Delta, and if your an Alaska member, why would you prefer the American flight, that requires you to then change your airline at Heathrow to get anywhere else in Europe, to the BA flight where you can get anywhere in Europe all on BA, and get more Alaska miles for the same distance. Oh and also get to fly BA which has been a better experience for me internationally. Like I have gone from Seattle to Europe multiple times since the pandemic. I've been on that BA flight more then once, the American flight never even came up as viable.

0
‼ 0
Brianair Guest

What a joke Dallas Airlines is. So sounds like Dallas will be their transpacific hub now? It’s like they’re not even trying outside Dallas, Charlotte, and Philadelphia. Almost all the new routes they’ve launched are to JV partner hubs. For what it’s worth I don’t see why they can’t build up a LAX transpacific hub like UA did in SFO. Sure there might be more competition than SFO but LA should have the population to support a few airlines hubbing at once. What a joke. I might even argue they don’t even deserve the American Airlines name at this point.

0
‼ 0
Randy Diamond

Business travel and conventions are staying away from SEA due to downtown conditions. Stayed at the Sheraton downtown a few times in the past couple of years and the hotel was like a ghost town. No one in the lobby at 930am nor at 1pm - prime check out and check in times. People can avoid SFO and go to San Jose area, but no 2nd place for SEA (Bellevue - not big enough).

0
‼ 0
Thomas Guest

SEA-LHR on AA was an easy way using 30k AA miles and no surcharges to get to/from Europe. There was even J available for 57.5k miles 3 days before the flight I took in August. None of the flights I took were full. I liked the timing - it meant you actually slept, even in Y. This flight was the only reason that I wanted to retain any AA miles as it was impossible to use AS miles on it. Sad to see it go. But not surprised.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published