Nine Years Later, Emirates’ “New” First Class Is Still On Just Nine Planes: Why?

Nine Years Later, Emirates’ “New” First Class Is Still On Just Nine Planes: Why?

29

On December 1, 2017, Emirates operated its first flight with its “Game Changer” first class. The product is phenomenal, and I rank it as being among the best first class experiences in the world.

In just under three months, we’ll celebrate the nine year anniversary of the airline introducing its “new” first class. There’s only one problem — these seats are still only available on a total of nine Emirates aircraft. Nine. For those not good at math, let me crunch the numbers for you… that’s the equivalent of introducing it on one aircraft per year.

I’d like to talk about that for a bit, because I think we probably don’t shame the airline enough for this, especially given what a great reputation it has. I mean, we joke about Lufthansa taking so many years to roll out Allegris, but that looks downright speedy compared to Emirates. Heck, Emirates has just announced its second new premium economy seat in a matter of years, while it’s “crickets” for the new first class.

What’s going on here, how does the airline get away with this, and why isn’t the Dubai-based behemoth installing this product on more planes?!

Why Emirates’ “Game Changer” first class is only on nine planes

Emirates hasn’t actually retrofitted a single aircraft with its “Game Changer” first class. Instead, the last nine Boeing 777-300ERs that the airline took delivery of — in late 2017 and 2018 — all feature this product. So the planes came delivered with these cabins installed.

Interior view of Emirates' “Game Changer” first class suite on a Boeing 777
Emirates’ “Game Changer” 777 first class cabin

Initially, the plan made perfect sense, as Emirates was supposed to start taking delivery of new Boeing 777Xs as of 2020, and those would then feature the new first class. So there was sort of a continuous plan for all new delivery 777s to get this product.

However, that’s not how things played out. Of course the 777X has since endured endless, rolling delays, and the current plan is for the first 777X to be delivered in 2027 (of course that could be pushed back again, just as it has been repeatedly in the past). Emirates is more reliant on the 777X than any other airline, as it has 270 of these jets on order, and the long term plan is for them to replace the Airbus A380 (once those are retired).

Now, if Emirates had simply opted not to retrofit its existing 777s, you might not think much of the lack of rollout of the new first class. However, Emirates has undertaken an aggressive cabin retrofit program on these planes, as the airline introduces a new business class product, adds a premium economy cabin, etc.

Emirates' redesigned business class seats aboard a Boeing 777
Emirates’ new 777 business class cabin

As the airline updates those 777s, it’s simply lightly refreshing the existing first class with a new color scheme and technology, while maintaining the same “bones.” In other words, the airline is intentionally not installing its new “Game Changer” first class on these planes.

What are Emirates executives thinking with this rollout?

Why is Emirates electing not to install its new first class product on existing 777s, as they’re retrofitted? The short answer is “because they can.” That comes down to two factors:

  • First class airplane seats are insanely expensive (we’re talking up to mid-six figures each), so installing the cabins is a huge investment
  • Not only that, but the new first class takes up more floor space; the first class cabin that otherwise has eight of the old first class suites can only accommodate six of the new first class suites
Emirates' older-generation first class suite aboard a Boeing 777
Emirates’ old 777 first class cabin

So it’s not too hard to figure out what’s going on here, because a company doesn’t want to spend a lot of money installing a new product, only to then see revenue go down. Now, hear me out, because I’m not giving Emirates management a free pass here.

Emirates executives are insanely smart. It’s one of the world’s most well-run airlines, and President Tim Clark knows exactly what he’s doing (which isn’t to say I always agree with him, but he’s incredibly deliberate).

The reality is that Emirates’ old first class suites are still excellent, they’re way better than business class (so they’re not cannibalizing demand), and Emirates invests a huge amount in the soft product, both in meaningful ways, and in ways that create headlines (unlimited caviar, the world’s best alcohol selection, etc.).

Caviar service presented to a passenger in Emirates first class
Emirates’ first class caviar service

The thing is, I wouldn’t criticize Emirates management if the airline had simply decided to not introduce this first class product in the first place until the 777Xs entered service. What rubs me the wrong way about the rollout is that the airline did decide to introduce this cabin on 777s, continues to heavily advertise it, and then doesn’t actually follow through on the investment of installing it on a widespread basis.

I 100% believe Emirates intended to roll this all out pretty quickly with its fleet renewal, and the 777X delays got in the way. But of course choosing what product to advertise is completely within Emirates’ control.

As a company, Emirates is the master of creating “halo effects.” For the most part, these are things that are actually widely available, like the A380 business class lounge and A380 first class shower. That’s different than having that halo effect be a product that’s available on 3% of aircraft.

If you go to Emirates’ dedicated page for first class, the first picture you’ll see at the top is of the “Game Changer” first class.

Screenshot of Emirates' first class webpage featuring the “Game Changer” suite
Emirates first class webpage

Then if you scroll down, you’ll see sections dedicated to both the A380 and 777, and you’d be led to believe that the primary first class on the 777s is the “Game Changer” one. Admittedly there’s a small note about how it’s only “available on selected routes depending on aircraft type, model and configuration.”

Screenshot of Emirates' first class webpage showing A380 and 777 cabin sections
Emirates first class webpage

But still, when you click to “explore our Boeing 777 First Class,” the entire page is about the “Game Changer,” rather than about the product that a vast majority of passengers will experience. Yes, technically there’s the disclaimer that not all planes have this product, though given how strict some advertising regulators are, I’m kind of shocked Emirates hasn’t faced more scrutiny over this.

Emirates isn’t making a good faith effort to introduce this product. The airline is trying to create a halo effect and milk this for good PR, without actually investing in installing it. And it’s fine if they don’t want to install it on other 777s, but in my opinion, don’t then act as if this is somehow the standard first class product. That’s the crux of the issue, as I see it.

Bottom line

Nine years ago, Emirates introduced its “Game Changer” first class. It’s a great product, but perhaps what’s most “game changing” is the glacial pace at which it has been introduced. We saw nine planes enter service with the product within around a year, and then… nothing.

I get what happened — Emirates was planning on installing this product on newly delivered 777Xs, and those were delayed year after year. But still, as Emirates retrofits existing 777s with new cabins, first class is basically staying the same. The airline isn’t really making a good faith effort at introducing this product.

I understand the logic — the seats are expensive to install, and capacity is reduced — but the issue is that the airline is still trying to heavily market this product, and would have you believe that this is available on well over 3% of the fleet.

What do you make of Emirates’ “Game Changer” rollout… or lack thereof?

Conversations (29)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Florida sunshine Guest

    So I first flew Emirates in 2007 and was JFK-DXB-JNB. They advertised the new first class on A340 which I later found out it was only on flights from JFK-DXB. I walked on my connecting flight and was extremely dissatisfied at first was in 2-2-2. So, I get with what Ben says as it is okay to advertise, but don’t make it seem like the product was everywhere. And it was a paid first round trip. Ticket

  2. World Traveler Guest

    They are taking a page out of fashion world. Runway stuff are usually the most expensive creation that regular people can’t afford. Runway shows are all about creating a fantasy and prestige. Most fashion houses don’t make money off runway stuff. They make money off lipsticks and perfumes where regular people can go into any department store and buy them. This is not that different from how Emirate operates. Most people can’t afford first class...

    They are taking a page out of fashion world. Runway stuff are usually the most expensive creation that regular people can’t afford. Runway shows are all about creating a fantasy and prestige. Most fashion houses don’t make money off runway stuff. They make money off lipsticks and perfumes where regular people can go into any department store and buy them. This is not that different from how Emirate operates. Most people can’t afford first class but they can afford buying an economy ticket. Same idea but different sector of business.

  3. DCAWABN Guest

    Because it was gimmicky and didn't offer a substantial enough premium over their other F product to be truly taken seriously, plus it cut down on the seat count at the same time. Seemingly the only "passengers" that gave a shit were bloggers who wanted to see the fake windows and attempt to order food by a rough version of Zoom.

  4. Frederik Guest

    Thinking it was ever going to get an airline wide rollout is clearly an idea built on desert sand.

  5. Toby Guest

    EK’s biggest advantage is the extent of their F network. Probably the only airline where you can cover most journeys fully in F - with a big gap over any other airline. So maybe they have little incentive to make big investments.

  6. McCaron Member

    Let's be honest: yes, airlines make significantly more money from a paid First Class passenger than from a paid Economy passenger, but First Class is still a niche market. Those cabins are nowhere near 100% full on every flight, and they exist as much for branding, prestige and differentiation as they do for actual revenue.

    Airlines will always have demand for Business and First, especially on certain routes, but let's not lose sight of the...

    Let's be honest: yes, airlines make significantly more money from a paid First Class passenger than from a paid Economy passenger, but First Class is still a niche market. Those cabins are nowhere near 100% full on every flight, and they exist as much for branding, prestige and differentiation as they do for actual revenue.

    Airlines will always have demand for Business and First, especially on certain routes, but let's not lose sight of the bigger picture: the vast majority of passengers—and therefore the bulk of the seats airlines need to fill—are in Economy. First Class may be far more profitable per passenger, but Economy is what keeps the planes full.

  7. Tennen Diamond

    @Lucky, how about ANA and JAL? Their newest flagship products are great, but as for the rest...

    ANA's had The Room and The Suite for 7 years... but only on a handful of planes. AFAIK, they don't have plans to update the rest of their 777 fleet.

    And JAL's hodgepodge of products is also crappy. How is it that, with the exception of the A350 seat, each generation got worse? Sky Suite Apex > Sky...

    @Lucky, how about ANA and JAL? Their newest flagship products are great, but as for the rest...

    ANA's had The Room and The Suite for 7 years... but only on a handful of planes. AFAIK, they don't have plans to update the rest of their 777 fleet.

    And JAL's hodgepodge of products is also crappy. How is it that, with the exception of the A350 seat, each generation got worse? Sky Suite Apex > Sky Suite II staggered > Sky Suite III reverse herringbone. And you're super screwed if you get stuck on a 787 with the Shell Flat angled seat.

  8. Darin Guest

    Insanely smart can still make bad decisions. Their premise for not installing PE was faulty and that took years to come around.

  9. Gene Guest

    Emirates and Delta are two of the most overreated airlines in the world, but yet the most profitable. That shows the value of great marketing!.

    1. 1990_ Diamond

      So is Ryanair, ironically. Maybe profits aren’t the best ways to judge carriers. Note how Ben never includes a stock ticker, balance sheet, or market cap detail in his reviews… huh.

  10. John Guest

    So what about doing the maths?

    A few years back, The Economist argued Emirates is basically the only airline in the world able to profitably sell first on its own (= making do with selling the seats rather than thinking of it mostly as a marketing gimmick promoting sales in other cabins).

    Well, maybe things have finally changed for Emirates as well. Perhaps First just isn't profitable enough anymore even for them.

    1. 1990_ Diamond

      Yeah… or, for some reason, all of the sudden, folks would prefer to not have to connect in the Middle East right now, I don’t know why /s

  11. Mick Member

    Didn’t Emirates get successfully sued in nz by someone who got the angled flat bed 777 seat when all the advertising was for the nicer a380 seat?

  12. FoulOwl Platinum

    While we’re at it, we should include Delta in this as well…
    Heaven help any poor soul that buys first class based on these two airlines websites.

    1. ImmortalSynn Gold

      What are you babbling about? Delta hasn't advertised an international first class in 30 years.

    2. FoulOwl Platinum

      If you thought my comment was on Deltas “international first class” then you missed the core point my friend. Keep babbling on! But please don’t drool

    3. ImmortalSynn Gold

      Your "core point" is even dumber than you appear to be, if your rant is about their domestic first. It's the same as any other in the region, and they don't market it otherwise.

    4. FoulOwl Platinum

      A Pedantic Delta devote I see. you might try some meditation or maybe some xanax. It will become a requirement without that starlink on your flights. haha.
      It was about Delta Ones seats.
      You will get and deserve no more attention from me.

    5. ImmortalSynn Gold

      "A Pedantic Delta devote I see"

      Moronic conclusion #2, you're on a roll.

  13. Paul Guest

    I have similar feelings about Qatar's Q suites. Ok to their credit they're installed on far more of their aircraft. But why did they stop the retrofit years ago? They're publicising Q Suite version 2 coming soon, yet a significant number of their 777s still have 20 year old 2x2x2 business seating. In particular l, why do they have 1 solitary 777-200 without Q suites? It's not possible to schedule 1 aircraft separately from the...

    I have similar feelings about Qatar's Q suites. Ok to their credit they're installed on far more of their aircraft. But why did they stop the retrofit years ago? They're publicising Q Suite version 2 coming soon, yet a significant number of their 777s still have 20 year old 2x2x2 business seating. In particular l, why do they have 1 solitary 777-200 without Q suites? It's not possible to schedule 1 aircraft separately from the rest of the fleet, so it's just guaranteeing occasional passenger dissatisfaction.

  14. Funkyflapjak Platinum

    youre right in that they dont get enough shame for this- this is even worse than delta using the A339/A359 D1 suites in marketing but still operating dozens of shitty 767's. At least they have more than 9 true Delta One planes!!! ** See Tim i'm defending Delta please come back I miss you bby

    1. TravelinWilly Diamond

      "** See Tim i'm defending Delta please come back I miss you bby"

      You're playing with fire. Next you'll look into a mirror and say "Candyman" five times.

      It's just not worth the risk.

    2. 1990_ Diamond

      (Willy, you see that new President Curtis show?Season 1, Episode 3, has a hilarious Candyman bit.)

  15. Rain Member

    An interesting question about the game changer is if the first 10 777x aircraft already have them installed. If they do, and American purchase the aircraft, will they beat Emirates to be the first to have 10 of them operational?

    1. jallan Diamond

      I would think not. Emirates' "game changer" seats are likely owned by Emirates, they have the patent for them, or the exclusive license. If the seats were already installed I expect they would be removed if those planes are going to anyone other than Emirates.

Recent Comments The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Florida sunshine Guest

So I first flew Emirates in 2007 and was JFK-DXB-JNB. They advertised the new first class on A340 which I later found out it was only on flights from JFK-DXB. I walked on my connecting flight and was extremely dissatisfied at first was in 2-2-2. So, I get with what Ben says as it is okay to advertise, but don’t make it seem like the product was everywhere. And it was a paid first round trip. Ticket

0
0
World Traveler Guest

They are taking a page out of fashion world. Runway stuff are usually the most expensive creation that regular people can’t afford. Runway shows are all about creating a fantasy and prestige. Most fashion houses don’t make money off runway stuff. They make money off lipsticks and perfumes where regular people can go into any department store and buy them. This is not that different from how Emirate operates. Most people can’t afford first class but they can afford buying an economy ticket. Same idea but different sector of business.

0
0
DCAWABN Guest

Because it was gimmicky and didn't offer a substantial enough premium over their other F product to be truly taken seriously, plus it cut down on the seat count at the same time. Seemingly the only "passengers" that gave a shit were bloggers who wanted to see the fake windows and attempt to order food by a rough version of Zoom.

0
0
Frederik Guest

Thinking it was ever going to get an airline wide rollout is clearly an idea built on desert sand.

0
0
Aaron Guest

Not exactly the “game changer” people keep calling it…

0
0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published