Why Lufthansa Is Wrong About The A321XLR

The Airbus A321XLR was officially launched early last week, and has been incredibly popular with airlines. Many airlines have even called it a game changer (#KenyaAirways).

The airplane has been one of the fastest selling models we’ve ever seen in the first few days of being introduced. The plane will have a range of 4,700nm when it enters service in 2023, so will offer incredible range and economics for airlines looking to operate point-to-point flights.

So far airlines like Aer Lingus, American, Frontier, Iberia, JetBlue, JetSMART, Jetstar, Qantas, and Wizz Air, have placed orders for the plane.

American A321XLR

However, it looks like Lufthansa is taking a more conservative approach.

Lufthansa’s A321XLR skepticism

Lufthansa’s CEO, Carsten Spohr, has said that while the airline is considering ordering the A321XLR, he doesn’t think the airplane is a game changer:

“The new XLR could be used in our network. We look at it. But in my view it is a niche product. It will not be a game changer.”

Why? Because he claims it’s not comfortable to spend more than four hours on a flight in a narrow body aircraft.

It’s ironic that this is coming from Lufthansa, the same airline that operated a regionally configured A319 from Frankfurt to Pune via Baku, which I called the world’s worst flight. With that flight, passengers were on board a plane without power ports or personal televisions for about 12 hours. In fairness that was a temporary arrangement, but still…

Anyway, I strongly disagree with Spohr on this. And before you say “Lucky, he knows more than you do.” Yes, that’s true, though that doesn’t mean airline executives always get it right — just look at Lufthansa’s recent Eurowings decision. Beyond that, Lufthansa has made some questionable fleet decisions in the past.

Why do I disagree with him?

Every airplane is niche

Sure, he’s right, the A321XLR is a niche product. But isn’t every plane a niche product on some level? Whether we’re talking about the A220, A350/787, 777X, or whatever else, every plane is niche on some level.

In many ways the A321XLR could have the same effect on the industry that the 787/A350 did, except on long haul flights rather than ultra long haul flights. It can open up long haul markets that aren’t feasible with 300+ seat planes, but that could work with 150-200 seat planes.

As airlines retire the 757 and 767, surely there’s room in the market for a replacement.

The 777-9 will also be a niche aircraft

Why this would hugely benefit Lufthansa’s network

Lufthansa has a transatlantic joint venture with United, Air Canada, SWISS, and Austrian, and it sure seems to me like there are many markets where the Lufthansa Group could benefit from the A321XLR.

One of the big goals of the transatlantic joint ventures is to offer seamless one-stop connections. Surely there are transatlantic markets, as well as markets in Africa, India, and the Middle East, where they know an A330 would offer too much capacity, but where an A321XLR would perfectly do the trick.

This is true across the Lufthansa Group airlines. How about an Austrian flight from Boston, a SWISS flight from Washington, or a Lufthansa flight from Nashville, for example?

Beyond that, this could be really useful for Lufthansa to expand long haul operations from Dusseldorf to Berlin in key markets, especially with the death of Eurowings (Lufthansa has long had trouble deciding how to serve the Dusseldorf to Newark market).

Passenger comfort on the A321XLR

Lufthansa could easily install all of their current cabins on the A321XLR, including their business class, premium economy, and economy seats. So from a passenger comfort standpoint the seats themselves could be identical.

Lufthansa’s current business class

The only difference would be the overall spaciousness of the cabin, though I’d argue that there’s a fair tradeoff between being able to fly point-to-point and getting to fly a bigger plane.

Bottom line

If anything, an airline like Lufthansa should most be able to benefit from the A321XLR. Their joint ventures are all about offering one-stop service to points around the world, and there are so many additional city pairs that could be made possible here, especially when you think about allocating these across the Lufthansa Group airlines.

So whether we’re talking about secondary cities in the US, or secondary cities in Africa, India, and the Middle East, I think the A321XLR has a lot of potential for the Lufthansa Group.

Lufthansa’s current smallest long haul plane has 250+ seats, so something smaller surely has a market.

My money is on Lufthansa Group changing their mind here and happily placing an A321XLR order. This plane is a game changer (for better or worse when it comes to passenger experience).

What do you guys think?

Conversations (76)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Sooth Guest

Hi,the only reason Lufthansa sent an a319 to Pune was because Pune doesn’t have a long runway,for a big plane Mr.Carsten knows,what he’s doing and knows what’s right for the company. At the end of the day,it’s not for us to judge and it’s not like this article can change anything.

0
‼ 0
Nordmann Guest

It has got to be an improvement on flying on the narrow-body Ilyushin 62 that Aeroflot was flying until the 1990s, and having flown on those, as well as travelled overnight on long distance buses around Australia, South Africa and Europe, I'd be happy to travel overnight on an AX321XLR if it meant I could fly from a regional airport. @CraigTPA That's the kind of pednatry [sic] up with which I shall not put. @The nice Paul Languages have quirks - ironically, while the Scandinavian languages have two words for 'more' as well as two words for 'less', I've still seen Swedes write 'less people' in English, Norwegians write 'few evidence'. And let's have a little less of the 'let it go'? It's so hippyish, but then again, so are many linguistics departments.

0
‼ 0
Axel Guest

The reason why LH doesnt need the XLR was mentioned in another interview here: https://runwaygirlnetwork.com/2019/07/02/lufthansas-a321xlr-impression-shaped-by-perceived-shortcomings/ I quote: "About half of Lufthansa’s cargo is carried in the hold of passenger planes, contributing 10-15% of flight revenue. “This aircraft is not a cargo provider,” Lufthansa Chief Commercial Officer – Network Airlines Harry Hohmeister said. “So why should I take a maybe 0.3% cost advantage against a 10-15% revenue disadvantage as Lufthansa?” He drew an important distinction that the group’s impression of the XLR may not be shared by peers. “Of course others might not have a cargo organization like we have.”" I think that explains it very well. Lufthansa would need a smaller A330, maybe sth like an A300neo or a B767X with a larger Cargo department, not a small single-aisle plane. Unfortunately Airbus is busy competing with themselves, e.g. the new 252t MTOW of the A330 now risks the A350, instead of building a smaller wide body for medium range.

0
‼ 0
Warren Douglas Guest

Actually Lufthansa may be right on this issue. The A321XLR will have several drawbacks due to the fact that it will not have enough wing area for the weight of the airplane. In addition, the XLR will not have enough power. Due to this lack of wing and power this jet is going to be very uncomfortable to ride in. At least initially it will not be able to get very high. This will create a rather uncomfortable ride for the passengers. On summer days the jet will likely be bouncing along at the tops of or in the clouds at altitudes of 28,000 to 31,000 feet. The jet will probably not be able to get any higher for several hours until it burns off enough fuel to reduce its weight. In addition, it's unlikely to be able to operate from shorter runaways due to these limitations. Airbus could overcome this situation by designing a larger wing and working with the their engine suppliers to develop a higher thrust power plant for the plane. However, from everything I've read Airbus has no plans to do this.

0
‼ 0
Jamie Gold

Please god have a toilet at the front of economy. Single aisle , 5 hr VA 737 from DPS to BNE you have an approx 10 minute window to get down the back for a comfort break. Lol.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published