Lufthansa CEO: It’s “Irresponsible” To Sell $11 Flights

Lufthansa’s CEO, Carsten Spohr, has made some controversial comments today about the cheap fares charged by some of the carrier’s major European ultra low cost rivals.

Lufthansa’s issues with cheap fares

Spohr has said that airlines selling flights for less than 10EUR (~11USD) is “economically, ecologically, and politically irresponsible.” He said that “flights for less than 10EUR shouldn’t exist.”

Not surprisingly, Spohr has motivation for what he’s saying — Ryanair and EasyJet have been growing significantly in Germany, and have been selling very cheap tickets from there. Spohr says that “nobody is going to push us out of our home markets” and that “the price war leaves its traces with us as well.”

He also states that Ryanair and EasyJet are “losing a massive amount of money” as they try to grow market share in Germany. The impact of this has been felt so much that it has caused Lufthansa to lower their profit forecast.

Rather conveniently all of this comes as Lufthansa’s low cost Eurowings division is restructuring, and I’m guessing that’s not unrelated to EasyJet and Ryanair.

My take on Spohr’s comments

Spohr’s comments are both outrageous and self-serving, in my opinion, and are one of the sillier ways I’ve seen Lufthansa attack their ultra low cost carrier competitors (and they’ve tried a lot of methods).

Is selling cheap fares economically, ecologically, and politically irresponsible?

Economically irresponsible?

Maybe we’ve been looking at different annual reports, but both EasyJet and Ryanair are exceptionally profitable. They just have a different way of selling tickets than Lufthansa, and that should be totally fine.

Most people aren’t actually paying 10EUR to fly — they may pay for seat assignments, bags, beer, lottery cards, etc. And the business model works for them.

If his suggestion is that the airlines aren’t making money as they grow market share in Germany, isn’t that the case for many airlines? Typically routes aren’t profitable from day one for airlines — it takes time to grow market share, and that’s something Lufthansa should be well aware of here.

Ecologically irresponsible?

To me this is the most interesting point. There’s no denying that travel has become a lot more accessible globally thanks to ultra low cost carriers, and nowadays there’s a lot of debate over whether that’s a good thing or not.

With governments increasingly trying to decrease airline emissions, and with KLM even encouraging people not to fly, times are different than in the past.

But Lufthansa seems to be taking the position here that the correct way to lower emissions is to eliminate cheap ways to fly? That’s convenient. Where’s their campaign encouraging their full fare business class passengers from having an e-meeting, rather than flying out to meet face-to-face?

Ironically Ryanair has a significantly more fuel efficient short haul fleet than Lufthansa does (they exclusively operate 737s that are an average of under eight years old, while Lufthansa operates all kinds of planes, many of which have a higher per seat cost), so Ryanair’s per passenger emissions are lower.

Politically irresponsible?

I’m not 100% sure what Spohr is referring to. My guess is that he’s referring to how EasyJet and Ryanair have some creative ways they’ve set up their business to lower costs. If that’s the case, there are plenty of airlines where that’s the case, and it’s telling that he’s only singling them out after they expand in Germany.

Bottom line

In my opinion Spohr is off base with his comments. For so long, Lufthansa has taken Germany for granted, and now EasyJet and Ryanair are finally giving them some competition on short haul flights.

There’s nothing economically irresponsible about this, because the airlines selling cheap flights are profitable.

As far as ecological responsibility, there’s no doubt we’re seeing a trend towards trying to lower emissions, but I don’t think cheap tickets is the problem. A person paying 10EUR to fly Ryanair has just as much of a right to fly as someone paying 60EUR to fly Lufthansa, in my opinion.

What do you make of Spohr’s comments? Is it irresponsible for airlines to sell super cheap tickets?

(Tip of the hat to Niko_jas)

Conversations (37)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Ian Guest

The suggestion that prices being more expensive to be environmentally friendly is bizarre. As an example I’m going from London to Dublin next week Tuesday - I found a flight with Ryanair for £20, great! But I also checked BA, are lingus and city jet prices. I wanted to go anyway, and the cheapest price for what is pretty much 45/50 minutes in the air is fine for me. The same flight is now on sale for £40 up to £107 - so would I be a better global citizen for paying more when I had the option to pay less? Of course not! It’s not dissimilar to suggesting we should make red meat more expensive because of the carbon created from cows. If I want a steak, I’ll buy a steak - increasing prices won’t make me vegetarian! Next up will be the suggestion that airlines shouldn’t offer super discounted staff travel rates ...

0
‼ 0
iazza Guest

1- not everyone in a flight pays 10€. 2- when you buy ticket at 10€ it doesn't mean you spend 10€: seat, luggage, food, lottery.... how many end up spending only 10€? 3- when a company like LH spends millions on, say, marketing this impact every ticket they sell: so is it ok to sell ticket at15€ (of which 5€ is a marketing expence) but it is not ok to sell ticket at 10€? (I wrote marketing but it could be everything - main airport - food - miles - etc)

0
‼ 0
Dominic Guest

I completely agree that these fares are ecologically irresponsible. The aviation business model in which carbon offset fees are optional should be abolished, and these fees should become mandatory parts of a ticket price. Sure, that means some people will not be able to fly (as much), but let us not forget that drastic action is needed to solve the changing climate.

0
‼ 0
Eskimo Guest

It's funny many people here are complaining (yes you one sided mind environmentalist) about $10 fares but forgot that many other on the same plane paid $250 for it. Airlines are not public service, they make money, they make profits. So NO THEY DON'T LOSE MONEY for selling few seats at $10. Before you try to ground fuel efficient planes, start dealing with cow farts first just like AOC.

0
‼ 0
GB to US Guest

Just a quick one, why do I get on a bus Everytime I deplane in FRA on a LH flight? This is the worst experience, no US carrier I've ever flown has had this! For me, this brings LH into LCC territory, certainly not 5 star.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published