Starlux Airlines Wants To Join Oneworld Alliance, But Is Being Blocked

Starlux Airlines Wants To Join Oneworld Alliance, But Is Being Blocked

27

Taiwan’s Starlux Airlines is a fast growing airline that was founded just before the pandemic. The airline now has a fleet of A321neos, A330-900neos, and A350-900s, and is quickly expanding. In terms of service to the United States, the airline flies to Los Angeles (LAX), Phoenix (PHX), San Francisco (SFO), and Seattle (SEA), with plans to add even more routes.

One of the challenges that Starlux has faced is its lack of airline partners, limiting the carrier’s reach beyond its own route network. The airline does have a loyalty partnership with Alaska Airlines, but that’s about it. Then it has an interline agreement with American, but that’s really a very basic level of cooperation.

For the past couple of years, Starlux’s CEO has made it clear that his airline would apply to join the oneworld alliance. Interestingly, there has been almost no news on that front since then. However, we did just learn that Philippine Airlines is joining oneworld, something that wasn’t necessarily expected.

So what’s the latest with Starlux potentially joining the oneworld alliance? Well, it appears that Starlux is facing some challenges with this, for exactly the reason I suspected…

Why it makes sense for Starlux Airlines to join oneworld

Starlux hasn’t at all been secretive about its desire to join the oneworld alliance. The oneworld alliance is the natural hit for Starlux, given the competitive landscape in Taiwan — China Airlines belongs to SkyTeam, and EVA Air belongs to Star Alliance.

There’s no way either of those alliances would have two airlines from Taiwan, so it makes sense that Taiwan’s third full service airline would join the third alliance.

Starlux would be a great fit for oneworld

For the most part, the global alliances have lost a bit of steam in the past decade or so, as we’ve seen fewer airlines added than when alliances were still a newer concept. Airlines have largely instead focused on joint ventures and other kinds of partnerships.

But still, when you look at the overall competitive landscape, it sure seems logical for Starlux to join oneworld. For that matter, oneworld is the alliance that has had the most momentum, and since 2025, we’ve seen three new airlines join — Fiji Airways, Hawaiian Airlines (really due to being merged into Alaska), and Oman Air.

The problem with Starlux Airlines joining oneworld

We know that Starlux Airlines wants to join the oneworld alliance. I’m sure the oneworld alliance at large would love for Starlux to join. After all, the alliance makes money from member airline fees, so the more members, the more money. There’s only one major issue — veto rights.

The oneworld alliance has four founding airlines that are still in business, including American Airlines, British Airways, Cathay Pacific, and Qantas. One of the perks of being a founding member of the alliance is that you get veto rights on new members joining.

As you can imagine, this can create a conflict of interest — it could be in the best interest of the alliance at large for a new member to join, while an individual founding member might not view it that way.

Back in 2024, I had guessed that Cathay Pacific may veto Starlux joining the alliance:

  • Taiwan and Hong Kong are very close to one another geographically, and the airlines potentially compete in quite a few markets, and for all kinds of passenger flows
  • Taiwan is Cathay Pacific’s third highest traffic market, after mainland China and Japan, so the airline wants to “defend” its traffic there, including those who are willing to transit through Hong Kong to stay within Cathay Pacific’s larger network
  • Keep in mind that American Airlines invested in China Southern, and China Southern left SkyTeam, but the airline hasn’t joined oneworld; I suspect that’s for the same reason, which is that Cathay Pacific didn’t want the airline to join, given how close Guangzhou is to Hong Kong

This is no longer just a theory, though, and it has been confirmed by Starlux’s CEO. During a recent shareholders meeting, he confirmed that Cathay Pacific is opposed to Starlux joining oneworld (thanks to Vincent for flagging this).

However, he is slightly more optimistic about the prospects, stating that he thinks it will take some time to resolve this, but in the end, he hopes that the opinions of other alliance members will prevail, and that Starlux will be able to join.

Cathay Pacific doesn’t wants Starlux to join oneworld

Really the alliance veto rights that founding airlines have is probably the biggest thing standing in the way of alliances growing. For example, Alaska joined the oneworld alliance a few years back, and that was only possible because of American’s support, as the two airlines launched a close partnership.

Who knows, maybe a compromise can be worked out here. After all, a lot of airline partnerships are looking a bit different after the pandemic than they would have several years back. Or if alliance membership isn’t possible, maybe we’ll increasingly see Starlux introduce more reciprocal agreements.

Alaska & Starlux already have a partnership

Bottom line

Starlux Airlines wants to join the oneworld alliance, and it would be a logical fit, given that the carrier’s two competitors in Taiwan belong to SkyTeam and Star Alliance. While Starlux has been pursuing alliance membership, unfortunately it hasn’t proven to be so straightforward.

Cathay Pacific is a founding member of oneworld, and has veto rights on any new members. Airlines tend to want to prevent competitors from joining their alliance. So just as Cathay Pacific didn’t want China Southern to join oneworld, we’re now learning that the airline has similar feelings about Starlux joining.

Interestingly, Cathay Pacific clearly didn’t feel the same about Philippine Airlines, despite it soon becoming Cathay Pacific’s geographically closest positioned fellow alliance member. That’s ultimately not too surprising, since the airline probably isn’t “premium” competition in the same way, and the two airlines even have a limited partnership, as it stands.

What do you make of Starlux wanting to join oneworld, and Cathay Pacific trying to block it?

Conversations (27)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Adam L Guest

    Starlux would be a fun addition. For a bunch of reasons I can't visit or even transit through China (including HK) without special clearances and a lot of headaches. That makes Cathay virtually unusable.

  2. ScottRWM New Member

    Cathay, China Southern and Starlux perhaps can be convinced to think of an alliance in a new way akin to 'A New Golden Triangle' for the OW alliance and tie in a huge portion of Asian, Chinese and South East Asian flying. It would be powerhouse in the region.

  3. nickjudge665 Member

    The consensus amongst travel anyalst seems to be that there isn't much value left in alliances. So why bother? They should instead focus on building joint ventures with airlines that bring the most value to them, and beef up their network. Some good prospects seem to be AS in North America, Turkish/Air Europa in Europe, and Virgin Australia or Qantas in Australia(imo Australia seems to be a hard one.) Something akin to what Emirates has...

    The consensus amongst travel anyalst seems to be that there isn't much value left in alliances. So why bother? They should instead focus on building joint ventures with airlines that bring the most value to them, and beef up their network. Some good prospects seem to be AS in North America, Turkish/Air Europa in Europe, and Virgin Australia or Qantas in Australia(imo Australia seems to be a hard one.) Something akin to what Emirates has done with United and Air Canada.This would be the most beneficial for the airline and could be rapid. They would need a JV anyways for better cooperation so why depend allegiance to an alliance group? In addition, CX has eaten up a lot of the traffic ex india for Mainland china and East Asia that's a missing dot that should be quickly remedied. (beyond too due to CX massive international operation. There use to be a time where (CI) China airlines was the only ROC carrier into New Delhi but they have seemed to back track.

  4. Joey Guest

    You buried the story. Took way too long to mention The Who and why is blocking.

    And F off Cathay.i hope they get sued and lose. A lot

    1. Stanley C Diamond

      @Joey On what legal grounds? As a founding member, CX simply exercised its rights as permitted by the OneWorld Alliance charter? In your opinion, if other airlines want to join an alliance but is blocked they can sue as well and the argument is that founding members cannot block us from joining even though it is clearly stated that they can?

  5. Alaska Flyer Guest

    Even though it is bittersweet as an Alaska flyer, I'm fine with it. If we let Starlux join, then the floodgates of other random miles will enter to take our Starlux J space. I like flying Cathay too and I'm willing to take the L on this to preserve what little we have of our miles. I'm selfish but sucks for everyone else lol.

    Cathay is a great member of the Oneworld and all the haters are crazy bc the lounges are top tier

  6. Paul Guest

    Starlux would be a great addition, Malaysia and Philipines are not the top notch airlines Oneworld needs. Starlux would be a great airline next to JAL & Cathay.

  7. CXTraveller Gold

    This is known (unverified but known) that CX is the obstacle for JX to join oneworld, and it makes sense:
    - CX is the largest carrier flying between Taiwan and HK
    - TPE is a mini-hub for CX and it still flies to ICN, NRT, and KIX non-stop from TPE.
    - Transit passengers originating from Taiwan is a significant business for CX with lucrative market up front.

    There is little for...

    This is known (unverified but known) that CX is the obstacle for JX to join oneworld, and it makes sense:
    - CX is the largest carrier flying between Taiwan and HK
    - TPE is a mini-hub for CX and it still flies to ICN, NRT, and KIX non-stop from TPE.
    - Transit passengers originating from Taiwan is a significant business for CX with lucrative market up front.

    There is little for CX to gain from a JX entry to oneworld. Frankly, I don't know what JX can do to make it happen; perhaps a stake in JX by CX? (is CX even interested in doing that?) JX and CX are not even interlined at the moment.

    PR is a very different situation. PR and CX has a history of partnership. Back in 1998, when PR was in trouble (Asian financial crisis), CX stepped in to fly some of PR's domestic and international routes. CX even considered investing in PR then but fell through. Philippines is a low-yield destination, and CX felt that they already capture the business class market quite well there; thus, PR's entry to oneworld would actually help expand CX's reach in that country.

    You may recall AA's investment in CZ back in 2017, hoping that would establish a closer tie with CZ. Geopolitics are always the wildcard and it did not result in closer cooperation between AA and CZ other than code-sharing. The power in China resides in Beijing (CA), not in Guangzhou (CZ).

    1. ernestnywang Gold

      CX hasn't flown TPE-ICN since COVID-19. CX does fly TPE-NGO.

  8. OtherSteve Guest

    12 paragraphs before any mention of who's blocking. Do better, Ben.

  9. Samo Diamond

    I'm not sure having airline partners has a lot to do with this. Airline can still sign commercial agreements with airlines outside the alliance. If there's an airline willing to codeshare with Starlux, or offer decent interline fares, it can still do so without a oneworld membership. And reversely, being in oneworld doesn't guarantee such agreement would be signed by other airlines.

    Alliance membership mostly affects FFP benefits and some "soft perks" not important to...

    I'm not sure having airline partners has a lot to do with this. Airline can still sign commercial agreements with airlines outside the alliance. If there's an airline willing to codeshare with Starlux, or offer decent interline fares, it can still do so without a oneworld membership. And reversely, being in oneworld doesn't guarantee such agreement would be signed by other airlines.

    Alliance membership mostly affects FFP benefits and some "soft perks" not important to many people, such as interlining on separate tickets (something many airlines these days anyway).

  10. Henry Guest

    The world probably is ready for a 4th alliance, JX, think about it=)

  11. Andrew Diamond

    I only have three experiences with CX:
    * NRT to TPE (paid for what appeared to be economy, received zero points or status for it on AA - this is the norm for them. You need a 4x price full fare economy ticket to receive points.)
    * DXB to HKG (AA award for business, overnight flight. Subpar aircraft, nonexistent service.)
    * HKG to ICN (AA award for business, day flight, gross food....

    I only have three experiences with CX:
    * NRT to TPE (paid for what appeared to be economy, received zero points or status for it on AA - this is the norm for them. You need a 4x price full fare economy ticket to receive points.)
    * DXB to HKG (AA award for business, overnight flight. Subpar aircraft, nonexistent service.)
    * HKG to ICN (AA award for business, day flight, gross food. And I eat almost anything.)

    Given my crappy redemption experiences and paid reward experience, I have a 0% chance of flying them. CX, do better. Don't make your alliance "do worse" as a strategy.

  12. Jordan Guest

    It makes sense; TPE is considered a hub for Cathay. In addition to the mountain of HKG frequencies, they also fly to Seoul and Tokyo from TPE. With Mainland continuing to blocked most flights to the USA, connecting traffic to and from China is extremely lucrative. It’s why a tiny Island nation can sustain three major carriers

  13. Portlanjuanero Gold

    An interesting observation for the starlux vs philipine discussion is I learned a couple of months ago that PAL actually partners with China Airlines in Taiwan - codeshare and lounge access. That was a bit surprising considering they must have been actively working on OneWorld membership at that point

    1. Creditian Guest

      China airlines actually have pretty tied relationships with Japan airlines, Malaysia airlines and Qantas, okay relationships with British airways and Cathay Pacific.

      But China airlines is stranger to Delta.

    2. Stanley C Diamond

      @Creditian Totally correct about the strange relationship between CI and DL. Both part of Skyteam but they do not like each other. Supposedly DL is pissed off that CI launched the Seattle to Taipei route.

  14. derek Guest

    It's not there yet, but someday I might favor expulsion of CX or creation of a new alliance with all except CX.

  15. Albert Guest

    Is there a provision for the other founding members to expel CX?

  16. 767-223 Guest

    Given how impossible it is these days to redeem premium cabin award seats on CX, Starlux would be a welcome alternative. Hopefully PR will also have better availability up front.

  17. 1990 Guest

    It would be awesome (for oneworld and those of us who have status with them) if both Starlux (and China Southern) joined oneworld. Wish Starlux would operate to NYC area, too.

  18. Andy Diamond

    It would be great if Starlux was going to join. I think it could happen, if they can agree with Cathay on a strategic alliance. Their network overlap is far from 100 percent, e.g., Europe including the UK is an important market for Cathay but not for Starlux. So if they get to terms, this would be great.

    1. ICN8513 Guest

      Considering that starlux is launching prague route in agust this year and tries to make barcelona, zurich routes next year, I think cathay pacific would still do veto.

  19. keitherson Guest

    Between SriLankan, RAM, Fiji, and even Oman Air, the latest addition of Philippine is not inspiring from a premium airline perspective. Especially when you consider the loss of LATAM.

    1. AeroB13a Guest

      But Keitherson, AA are a founder member of the alliance, but toi they are hardly an “Inspiring from a premium airline perspective”.

    2. AeroB13a Guest

      That should read …

      But Keitherson, AA are a founder member of the alliance, but today they are hardly “Inspiring from a premium airline perspective”. Apologies.

  20. Tom Guest

    A trade of CX for SQ would be excellent for oneworld more generally but obviously it would never happen. Similarly can’t help but think most of the oneworld airlines wish they were partnering with UA (or DL) at this point. Oneworld does seem to be doing a good job of sucking up the most premium remaining non-aligned airlines.

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

1990 Guest

It would be awesome (for oneworld and those of us who have status with them) if both Starlux (and China Southern) joined oneworld. Wish Starlux would operate to NYC area, too.

3
Andy Diamond

It would be great if Starlux was going to join. I think it could happen, if they can agree with Cathay on a strategic alliance. Their network overlap is far from 100 percent, e.g., Europe including the UK is an important market for Cathay but not for Starlux. So if they get to terms, this would be great.

3
OtherSteve Guest

12 paragraphs before any mention of who's blocking. Do better, Ben.

2
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published