What Could Biden’s New International Travel Restrictions Be?

Tomorrow is President Trump’s last day in office, at which point President-Elect Biden will take his place. Last night we learned that President-Elect Biden plans to introduce new international travel restrictions, and in this post I wanted to discuss that in a bit more detail, and share some theories on what we could see.

Biden plans new restrictions around international travel

Yesterday it was announced that President Trump would end the travel bans against Brazil and much of Europe as of January 26, 2021, which is the same day as of which the US will start requiring pre-travel testing for anyone arriving in the US by air.

Shortly after the above update was revealed, the soon-to-be White House Press Secretary took to Twitter to explain that the Biden administration is planning new travel restrictions:

With the pandemic worsening, and more contagious variants emerging around the world, this is not the time to be lifting restrictions on international travel. On the advice of our medical team, the Administration does not intend to lift these restrictions on 1/26. In fact, we plan to strengthen public health measures around international travel in order to further mitigate the spread of COVID-19.

Current travel restrictions will remain in place

What new international travel restrictions could we see?

We’re being told to expect more “public health measures around international travel” once Biden becomes president. I’m sure we’ll find out more in the coming days, but what could that look like?

The way I view it, there are a few approaches the Biden administration could take, given that pre-travel testing has already been announced as a new requirement. In no particular order:

Could we see more foreigners banned?

President-Elect Biden plans to at least initially keep around the current Brazil and Europe travel bans, so could we actually see travel bans expanded, and see all non-Americans banned from entering the US? After all, the current travel bans are rather arbitrary, and don’t necessarily reflect infection rates in different countries.

Could we see a blanket “ban” on international travel?

I put the word “ban” in quotes because I’m not sure the US could legally do that. I could see the government trying to discourage international travel, doing everything short of legally banning it. When the UK went into lockdown in November, the country banned leisure travel. Enforcement was a whole different story, though.

We could see the US try to ban international leisure travel

Could we see a quarantine requirement?

Could we see the US start to require a quarantine for arriving international travelers? Realistically this almost certainly wouldn’t be like Australia or New Zealand, where you’re quarantined in a government facility. Rather this would be a self-quarantine, and it probably wouldn’t be enforced very well. For example, take a look at New York’s quarantine, which is observed about as well as the speed limit.

Could we see a post-travel testing requirement?

Here’s another option that I think could make sense. The US will start requiring pre-travel testing for arriving international flights. How about some post-travel testing as well? Maybe travelers could be required to test three days after returning to the US, since you’re much more likely to catch infections from travel if you get two tests several days apart.

Could the US require post-travel testing as well?

My take on new travel restrictions

In addition to the new pre-travel testing requirement, I think the most likely scenario is that the Biden administration will discourage international travel as much as possible, though admittedly that would probably act as more of a recommendation than a law.

Personally I think the most logical move would be for the US to lift country-based travel restrictions, and instead require testing both before and after travel. This could also potentially be enforceable, because the government could have people upload test results to some portal.

I can’t make much sense of other types of restrictions, though:

  • I suppose we could see a quarantine requirement for international travel, but I’m sure enforcement would be non-existent
  • Banning visitors from more countries doesn’t seem like it would solve all that much, especially with the pre-travel testing requirement

I think the pre-travel testing requirement is a step in the right direction. Obviously it doesn’t guarantee there won’t be any cases entering the US this way, but it should help minimize them. Hawaii has done reasonably well limiting new cases in conjunction with pre-travel testing from the mainland.

If we’re going to see new travel restrictions, I think a much bigger concern is how all of the United States is traveling to Florida, where there are virtually no restrictions, and there are no testing requirements. So much criticism is directed towards people vacationing in Mexico — at least there are some restrictions in place in many resort areas, unlike in Florida, and at least there will soon be a testing requirement prior to returning to the US.

How about some Florida travel restrictions?

Bottom line

The Biden administration intends to introduce new international travel restrictions. This apparently includes keeping around President Trump’s current travel bans, which Trump was otherwise going to drop as of January 26.

I’ll be curious to see what the Biden administration comes up with. If there are going to be more restrictions, my hope is that they’re not arbitrary, and that they’re actually enforceable.

What kind of new international travel restrictions do you think we’ll see?

Conversations (54)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Susanh Guest

I’m Canadian, currently wintering in Arizona, in a gated “bubble” community with no Covid problems at all. Everyone adheres to the mask and distance protocols, and before entering the US we tested negative. So I don’t understand the other above Canadian views that the US-Can border should be totally closed. Most Canadian snowbirds own properties in the US and have a need to visit them for upkeep and maintenance, we cannot just abandon them. Why have northern border closures at all, when the Southern border is wide open? The new pre-travel testing measures are difficult as it’s impossible to get the proper test and be guaranteed the results within the 3-day period. However, that is a more non-arbitrary measure than just locking it down completely. We won’t have any operating airlines left, they will all be out of business.

0
‼ 0
Levin Y Guest

What the masses are getting is confusion. There are so many inconsistencies in the processes. I believe Biden may finally have the political will and support, especially from China, for the whole world to standardize entry requirements, and all countries to bear the burden of treating all rather than ignoring foreigners health and repatriating them back to their home country. This is how this second wave is occurring. I believe Koreans and a lot of them in NY were forced back home, restarting the while thing to come back again. Once the processes are standardized, people will be ready to travel. Yes, we will be able to travel albeit mask on, off for eating and other strenuous activities etc but that's the way it'll be until it finally goes.

0
‼ 0
Mary Guest

After months of democratic politician disobeying their own rules and travel restrictions people are done. If anybody is going to take Biden's 'restrictions' seriously I'm sorry you have been brainwashed.

0
‼ 0
Samo Guest

Beyond ridiculous. There is absolutely no point in having any border restrictions with such a widespread community spread as the US has. It's beyond me how some people still think the virus cares about borders.

0
‼ 0
Andy Guest

Firstly, I definitely welcome if the purely political criterion (citizenship of country X) is replaced by public health criteria (e.g. negative test result). I would hope that lessons learned over the last year would be taken into consideration (e.g. many countries have found out that long quarantine requirements only based on international travel are very costly but not very effective; perhaps shorter quarantine combined with testing is better). Based on our experience, the main spreading events are parties, regardless whether they takes place abroad, locally, in clubs or in private premises. This makes the extremely difficul to control. That's why some favour easier to control things, such as international travel, although it is very ineffective and causes a large collateral damage.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published