Alaska Airlines’ Airbus Fleet Retirement Plans

Alaska Airlines has this week ordered even more Boeing 737 MAXs, and in the process has revealed plans to retire most of its Airbus A320-family fleet.

Alaska increases 737 MAX order

Alaska Airlines has restructured its agreement with Boeing to order a total of 68 Boeing 737 MAX 9s, with an option for 52 additional planes:

  • A couple of months ago Alaska Airlines had a total of 32 Boeing 737 MAX 9s on order
  • In late November Alaska Airlines ordered a further 13 Boeing 737 MAX 9s, bringing the order total to 45; as part of that deal, the airline announced plans to sell 10 A320s
  • In other words, with this order Alaska Airlines is committing to a further 23 Boeing 737 MAX 9s beyond what had been previously ordered

The timeline for Alaska Airlines’ 737 MAX 9 deliveries has also been revealed. The airline is planning on taking delivery of:

  • 13 737 MAXs in 2021
  • 30 737 MAXs in 2022
  • 13 737 MAXs in 2023
  • 12 737 MAXs in 2024

Then the 52 aircraft options are for delivery between 2023 and 2026.

It’s not surprising to see Alaska order more 737 MAXs:

  • The airline has relatively few planes on order, to replace its existing 737s
  • Chances are that the airline got amazing terms with Boeing and lots of flexibility, given the history of the 737 MAX, and Boeing’s eagerness to secure new orders

The 737 MAX 9 is the future of Alaska Airlines’ fleet

Alaska will retire most Airbus planes by 2023

Arguably more interesting than Alaska Airlines’ increased Boeing 737 MAX order is the implications this order has for Alaska Airlines’ Airbus fleet.

Alaska Airlines acquired its Airbus aircraft through its Virgin America takeover, and as it stands the airline has:

  • 10 Airbus A319s, which are an average of over 13 years old
  • 49 Airbus A320s, which are an average of over 10 years old
  • 10 Airbus A321neos, which are an average of under three years old

While it has long been rumored that Alaska Airlines would retire most of its Airbus aircraft, that’s now official. Alaska Airlines has confirmed that it will replace all A319s and A320s with Boeing 737 MAX 9s by mid-2023.

So while Alaska Airlines won’t go back to an all-Boeing fleet, the Seattle-based carrier’s Airbus fleet will exclusively consist of 10 A321neos.

As it’s explained, the 737 MAX 9 is 20% more fuel efficient than the A320 on a per-seat basis, and it can fly 600 miles farther.

Alaska Airlines will retire most of its Airbus fleet

Could Alaska do something cool with remaining A321neos?

While it’s highly unlikely anything like this will happen soon, one has to wonder if Alaska could eventually do something special with its A321neo fleet. As much as I’m sure Alaska would love fleet consistency, it makes perfect sense that Alaska isn’t retiring these planes, since they’re new and fuel efficient.

With a subfleet of 10 A321neos, one has to wonder if Alaska Airlines might not eventually use these in a different way than other planes. For example, could A321neos eventually be set up for select transcon flights with a better onboard product?

Alaska is alone in not offering flat beds in business class between New York and Los Angeles/San Francisco. The airline has doubled down on this concept and seems fine with giving up the premium market, though could that eventually change?

This is entirely speculation on my part, though 10 A321neos seems like a potentially decent subfleet to have.

Alaska’s current Airbus inflight product

Bottom line

Alaska Airlines has increased its Boeing 737 MAX 9 order to 68 planes, with an option for a further 52. The planes on firm order will be delivered between 2021 and 2024. As part of this deal, Alaska Airlines will also retire its A319 and A320 aircraft by 2023, meaning that the only Airbus aircraft the airline will operate will be 10 A321neos.

What do you make of these developments to Alaska Airlines’ fleet?

Conversations (26)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Michael Rodriguez Guest

Alaska does not fly the A319 anymore.

0
‼ 0
Jason Brandt Lewis Guest

Josh, you may indeed "stick to your guns" and "NEVER step foot aboard a MAX aircraft!" But human beings have a notoriously bad memory, and with the HUGE number of MAX aircraft either already delivered or still on order from carriers like Southwest (36 MAX jets in inventory, with another 37 on order), American (30 in inventory, 10 more on order), United (19 in inventory, 27 on order), or Alaska (zero in inventory, 3 on order), etc., I have no doubt that a) airlines will be flying them, and b) passengers will be on them....

0
‼ 0
Marco Guest

It's unimpressive that AS didn't take the opportunity to grow up once they acquired VX. Instead, they just eliminated a competitor and decided to shrink back to their old Seattle-only, all-Boeing nonsense. They could have grown; now they won't be able to really leverage their new OneWorld membership with such a modest operation. As for the 737, I have no horse in the game; I take my hat off for its historical achievements - but by now it's a 52-year-old relic that belongs in a museum. The only reason that any airline is still buying that piece of crash-prone garbage is the virtual duopoly in the airframer market... What a shame.

0
‼ 0
Josh Guest

This is BAD for Alaska Airlines! I will NEVER step foot aboard a MAX aircraft! I assume that AS only bought/leased these aircraft because of low prices! One crash of this type for AS may be the END of the airline and Boeing as well! BAD CHOICE ALASKA!

0
‼ 0
Jason Brandt Lewis Gold

I understand the A319s and A320s are lease returns. As far a possible "Mint-equivalent" on Alaska is concerned, I actually think it makes sense. Keep in mind that when AS reconfigured the ex-VX first class, adding seats and taking away recline, that was before a) AS announced they were joining OneWorld; b) separate AA/AS and AA/B6 "partnerships" were announced; and c) before AA decided to abandon a true F service on its transcon flights. AA's A321T's were, in a sense, a four-class plane, if one considers Main Cabin Extra as a separate class. (I don't think extra legroom as a separate class per se, but...) AS increased F on the ex-VX A320 series from 2 rows (8 seats total) to 4 (16). If AS stuck to a 4 seat-per-row setup, I think they could manage a total of 12 seats, versus the 5 rows/10 seats on AA's 321T's. Given the incentives of AA giving up the market, *and* the increase (presumably) in traffic on AS given the new partnership between AA & AS, I think it might be viable....

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published