Has Airline Fleet Planning Become Short-Sighted?

We’ve seen several airlines make major changes to their fleet plans in recent months, and I can’t help but pose the question of whether airlines are acting a bit irrationally, and oscillating between extremes.

The shifting attitude among airline leadership

Up until the start of the pandemic, all too many airline executives acted as if the only way was up. I couldn’t make sense of it at the time, and I can’t make sense of it now. Just to give a few examples that span different parts of the industry:

Etihad had ordered hundreds of new planes, including the 777X

Suffice to say that in general these attitudes have changed, and the pandemic has been a great reset for the industry. Most airline executives expect it will take years for a full recovery, and just this week Lufthansa CEO Carsten Spohr questioned whether business travel would ever recover to pre-pandemic levels.

Are airlines now short-sighted with fleet planning?

I can’t help but step back for a moment and look at how attitudes in the industry have shifted:

Air France became the first airline to retire all of its A380s

Heck, this is even the case at Emirates, which is by far the world’s biggest A380 customer, and the biggest fan of the plane. The airline plans to fly A380s through the mid-2030s, and eventually plans to replace them with 777Xs. However, the airline keeps trying to reduce its 777X order, claiming the plane is too big.

I understand the thinking of airlines in general:

  • Aircraft technology has improved significantly, as we’re now seeing smaller, longer range, and more fuel efficient aircraft than ever before, ranging from the A321XLR to the 787 & A350
  • This allows airlines to operate point-to-point routes that simply wouldn’t have previously been economical, and in general allows airlines to maximize yields, by not having to dump too much capacity in markets

The A321XLR will enter service in 2023, and is an incredible plane

At the same time:

  • Pandemic aside, the demand for global air travel keeps growing, and that’s a trend that will continue over the coming decades
  • Airports keep getting more congested, and in general we’re not seeing much airport growth in many parts of the world, largely over environmental concerns
  • While the A321XLR is an incredible plane, it’s not great for cargo, which can also  be extremely profitable for airlines
  • While not all routes need a lot of capacity, most major airlines have some markets where there’s a lot of demand, be it New York to Frankfurt (for Lufthansa), London to Doha (for Qatar Airways), New York to Tokyo (for All Nippon Airways)
  • While point-to-point routes are great, the reality is that the major network airlines aren’t fundamentally adjusting their long-term business models, which is to say that the hub-and-spoke model is still very much alive, and that plays into having big planes operating prime routes
  • Is there a point at which consumers simply prefer bigger planes, whether it’s avoiding narrow body planes for long haul routes, wanting to fly planes that have first class, etc.?

Could the A350 be Lufthansa’s largest aircraft in the future?

My comments here aren’t really targeted at any one particular airline. However, if I had to give a few examples, I suppose I have the following questions, especially looking forward about a decade:

  • Does Lufthansa really not think it will need 20 777Xs as flagship aircraft, once 747-8s are retired?
  • Does Emirates really not plan to at least have a 1:1 replacement of 777Xs for A380s? Pre-pandemic the airline operated 10 daily A380 flights to London-area airports, so what’s next, 20 daily 787s?

I suppose airlines might be thinking “well, we can always order 777Xs in the future if we need to,” but this also gets at the extreme oscillation I’m referring to, between planning for the future as if nothing can go wrong, and then taking a doom-and-gloom strategy and acting as if nothing can go right.

What will Emirates look like in a post-A380 era?

Bottom line

It’s fascinating to see the shift in thinking among airline executives when it comes to future aircraft orders. Pandemic aside, the global demand for air travel keeps growing, while long haul planes keep getting smaller.

While I can appreciate that this largely comes down to the emergence of smaller, more efficient, and longer range aircraft, I still can’t help but feel like this might all be a bit short-sighted, as we see airlines essentially suggesting that a 777 is simply way too big nowadays.

Call me optimistic, but I think the airline industry will recover fully, and I also think we’ll get to the point where we see the 777X become a popular plane. Yes, both the 787 and A350 are amazing aircraft, but at a minimum I think there’s a market for the 777X being a flagship aircraft for a lot more airlines.

What do you make of the huge change in direction among airlines with future fleet plans? Is this a knee-jerk reaction to the pandemic, or is there simply no market (even a decade down the road) for anything bigger than a 787 or A350?

Conversations (41)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Tom Guest

100% too short sighted. It’s a cycle just like the markets or pretty much anything else — it’s down but will make up ground and grow even more. If you think population will decline and people are going to simply cease to travel/move about then I’m sorry but you’re wrong based on the history of human existence. There’s a huge amount of pent up demand and once you open the flood gates just watch. You see it in domestic routes for months. I got on a UA flight SAT-IAD completely packed on a Wednesday. Not a single seat left. This isn’t exactly a hot route either. Covid cases are rapidly dropping and vaccinations are above 1.5 million a day just in the US.

0
‼ 0
The nice Paul Guest

@Azamaraal Setting to one side my suspicion that you are paid by Boeing to slag off Airbus (so frequently do you do that), besides the obvious one*, I can’t think of any area in life where even an extra cm or so of space is so very welcome. The fact is, rephrasing what you have written, the Airbus has more personal space for each passenger than the Boeing. Doesn’t matter how much you seek to downplay that: that’s pretty important. * I was thinking of tv screens. Probably.

0
‼ 0
Azamaraal Guest

I read an engineering study that shows the average width of an A320 seat is less than 0.3 inch wider than 737. The fuselage is only 6 inches wider for 6 seats plus aisle. Widest seats are on C Series Bombardier - er A220. 18 inches

0
‼ 0
Aman Guest

Overall, I agree that international travel will take years to recover to pre-pandemic levels if at all. Technology has made a majority of business travel redundant and this will disproportionately impact traditional legacy and network carriers. Most legacy carriers supported their bloated cost structures by creating an unsustainable business model of charging exhorbidant fares to corporate customers. That market has collapsed structurally and the leisure market cannot support these inflated costs. And whether we like it or not, most people would prefer to fly point to point with lesser comforts versus transiting through a hub airport just to fly an ornate A380. Hence the move to adjust aircraft orders is not wrong as it gives airlines far more flexibility to align supply with demand- they can simply add another frequency if required. Slot restrictions will ease as demand goes down and traffic scatters to a larger number of smaller airports. While business class cabins on an A321 xlr won’t be as luxurious vs those on a 777x, the economy seats will be identical perhaps even a tad roomier considering the fuselage of the A321 family that gaurantees an 18 inch width irrespective of the configuration. And it is the economy cabins that will become the mainstay for most if not all larger carriers. Lufthansa therefore is not wrong in adapting their fleet orders as the larger aircraft’s in their fleet had large premium cabins that will be impossible to fill. And more importantly they will have to compete with the likes of JetBlue who offer a vastly superior product with a much lower cost structure. Even carriers like Emirates that are better placed in terms of cost structures are also responding to this trend. Among the Western legacy carriers, I believe Delta has been the most forward in identifying this trend choosing to keep smaller business class cabins on their flagship A359s vs United which has gone for ultra premium heavy configurations.

0
‼ 0
RTBones Member

We are all looking at this through the prism of the pandemic. Fleet renewal is not something that is done overnight - it is planned years in advance. I think what the pandemic has done is accelerate a trend that was already happening - namely to get smaller, more efficient, less costly aircraft. By doing that, the airlines become more flexible to changes in the market - even those changes beyond their control.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published