Wow: American & JetBlue Northeast Alliance Blocked

This has major implications for American, JetBlue, and the industry overall.

Judge rules American & JetBlue have to end partnership

In early 2021, American Airlines and JetBlue Airways launched the Northeast Alliance, which was in many ways a first-of-its-kind partnership in the United States. This alliance had all kinds of implications. For one, the airlines were able to coordinate their schedules, swap slots and gates, and more. Beyond that, the airlines offered frequent flyer reciprocity, in the form of elite benefits and points earning and redemption opportunities.

The logic behind this partnership was that American struggled to grow organically in New York, but with the help of JetBlue, the airline could turn New York into more of an international gateway. The airlines argued that this would benefit consumers, with a more competitive product offering in New York and Boston.

The Biden administration had a different view on the partnership, though. In September 2021, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit to block this alliance, arguing it hurt competition and was bad for consumers. There was a lengthy court case regarding this, and a decision has finally been made.

On Friday, US District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled in favor of the Justice Department, and the alliance between American and JetBlue now has to be terminated.

For those wondering about Judge Sorokin’s logic, here are some of the key points of Sorokin’s decision:

  • The primary motivation for American and JetBlue establishing the Northeast Alliance was to strengthen their own competitive positions against Delta (and to a lesser extent United) in Boston and New York
  • The airlines being able to coordinate their schedules has led to decreased capacity, lower frequencies, and reduces consumer choices in many markets, including some that were heavily trafficked
  • The airlines sharing revenue eliminates their incentive to compete with one another
  • While American and JetBlue claimed that their collaboration benefited the flying public, they produced minimal objectively credible proof to support that claim
  • The Northeast Alliance is an unreasonable restraint on trade, and violates the Sherman Act
American expanded long haul service in New York with this alliance

What American & JetBlue have to say about this ruling

Here’s what an American Airlines spokesperson had to say about this ruling:

”We believe the decision is wrong and are considering next steps. The Court’s legal analysis is plainly incorrect and unprecedented for a joint venture like the Northeast Alliance. There was no evidence in the record of any consumer harm from the partnership, and there is no legal basis for inferring harm simply from the fact of collaboration. The Northeast Alliance has been a huge win for customers and anything but anticompetitive.”

Meanwhile here’s what a JetBlue spokesperson had to say about this ruling:

”We are disappointed in the decision. We made it clear at trial that the Northeast Alliance has been a huge win for customers. Through the NEA, JetBlue has been able to significantly grow in constrained northeast airports, bringing the airline’s low fares and great service to more routes than would have been possible otherwise.”

I can think of one airline that’s jazzed with this outcome

What happens next between American & JetBlue?

This ruling (and for that matter the Justice Department’s lawsuit to begin with) is kind of unprecedented in the airline industry. I can’t think of any time in the past where an existing agreement has been challenged in this way.

Based on the ruling, American and JetBlue have 30 days to end their Northeast Alliance. It’s not entirely clear to me if this means that the partnership between the two airlines has to be discontinued altogether, or if the airlines just have to scale it back.

For example, presumably the airlines could still have a frequent flyer partnership, but they definitely can’t coordinate schedules and swap slots and gates. The question is whether the airlines even find it worthwhile to have a partnership if they can’t do those things.

I think American is by far the biggest loser with this ruling, and the airline has an uphill battle here. The airline has added all kinds of service out of New York, so how will it fill all those planes, given that it was relying heavily on JetBlue for that? Will American somehow ramp up its domestic connectivity out of New York, or will it scale back its long haul service out of the airport?

I don’t think the news is necessarily quite as bad for JetBlue. For one, the airline was ultimately getting a marginal amount of revenue through this by filling domestic seats, but those seats largely fill themselves nowadays. The partnership was definitely more beneficial to American than to JetBlue.

The other question is what this means for the the JetBlue and Spirit merger being approved, as that merger is facing a similar lawsuit. On the one hand, this seems like bad news in terms of the government cracking down. On the other hand, maybe without the Northeast Alliance, JetBlue is more likely to gain approval for taking over Spirit.

I understand the Justice Department’s argument, and the judge’s ruling. American and JetBlue didn’t do a very good job making their case, and it can absolutely be argued that the level of coordination between the airlines was bad for consumers.

Personally, as an American frequent flyer, I loved this partnership. Being able to fly JetBlue and earning miles and perks was awesome. Now, there’s no reason that necessarily has to end, since that’s not really the focus of the scrutiny they faced.

Personally I saw value in American and JetBlue combining forces to compete more directly with Delta in New York, though that’s largely due to American’s own laziness. The airline hasn’t tried in New York for so long, and seemed to just be looking for an easy solution to expand in New York.

American & JetBlue will have to scale back their partnership

Bottom line

A judge has ruled that American and JetBlue have to end their Northeast Alliance within 30 days, arguing that it harms competition and is bad for consumers. This follows the Justice Department’s lawsuit against the two airlines that was filed back in 2021.

It’s going to be really interesting to see what happens over the coming weeks, as the airlines have their work cut out for them, and then some. Will American retreat from New York and give up many of its long haul routes, or will the airline try to grow in New York on its own? Will American and JetBlue maintain a frequent flyer partnership? And what does this mean for the JetBlue and Spirit merger? Only time will tell…

What do you make of the Justice Department winning its lawsuit against American and JetBlue?

Conversations (80)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

iamhere Guest

Your opinion on this matter is biased because you are loyal customer to AA.

0
‼ 0
Vlee Guest

I’m a little confused so apologize if this is a dumb question, but does this ruling only affect BOS-NYC flights or the partnership as a whole? I’m not Northeast based, but do fly PHX-BOS quite a lot. This particular Jetblue route isn’t a codeshare - would status benefits still apply in this case?

0
‼ 0
Brianair Guest

I think American should have worked on organically improving its own product to compete with Delta and United. Simply cozying up with JetBlue in this Northeast Alliance seemed like a lazy band-aid measure by the management to fix the many years they had spent ruining the airline (and the last few airlines it acquired since the management remained the same). The many years they spent turning it into an overpriced ULCC that nobody wants to fly on unless they live in Dallas, Charlotte, or Philadelphia, in which case they're forced to. American should have instead spent those years to put in the work to make their hard and soft product comparable to or better than JetBlue. If Delta and now United can do it, why can't they? Maybe if they have a better product it would do wonders to make "Dallas Airlines" relevant in the New York City market again. Or a better network. Dallas Airlines needs to be aware that there's more to the world than LHR and South America. United was already aware of that ages ago. Oh well, I don't have much hope given who's running American. I'm guessing within 30 days, they'll probably announce cuts to those international routes they launched at JFK recently (which they launched on the assumption that this alliance would happen), retreat back to you-know-where, and essentially go back to being US Airways.

1
‼ 0
Barry Graham Guest

Does the government ask what the allegedly affected people think before making such rulings? We flew at the last minute with JetBlue from Florida to Washington for less than $100 each. We got exit row seats with huge legroom because of my status with American. There is nothing bad about this partnership.

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

The court released an extensive powerpoint of their findings and it is as patently inaccurate as can be to say that the court failed to prove that the NEA was uncompetitive and collusionary. It really doesn't matter if some people on social media don't get it. The words and internal documents of AAL and JBLU execs extensively show that the NEA was intended to suppress competition, did it, and AAL specifically chose to pursue the NEA even though it knew it could achieve most of the results using an ALK style partnership - but they chose the NEA anyway. 3 years later, AAL and JBLU now have to immediately undo in 30 days their bad decisions, are both now worse off than they were before the NEA, and have provided an even greater opportunity for competitors to grow than if they both grew on their own. The court found those points and anyone that argues otherwise simply doesn't want to face the truth. The court itself showed that DL and UA both have grown as they intended to do all along - something AA and B6 did not do because of the NEA. That in itself is the definition of collusion to suppress competition There is no viable case for an appeal. The judge also showed that AA specifically considered an AS-style relationship with B6 but chose to pursue the NEA which they knew was counter to US antitrust laws. Now they have to undo on 30 days notice what they created and B6 will have to compete with DL and UA. Those are the words of the judge, not mine.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published