Malaysia Airlines Is Bringing Back The 747!

While there are many things I love about the A380, the 747 will always be the queen of the skies, in my opinion.

The 747 signified a quantum leap for aviation, as it opened up new possibilities. It’s amazing to think that Boeing went from the 707 straight to the 747.

Unfortunately the 747 isn’t the most fuel efficient plane out there anymore, and we’ve seen airlines progressively retire them over the past several years.

Malaysia Airlines used to have a fleet of Boeing 747s, which they retired in 2012. This coincided with the airline taking delivery of their six Airbus A380 aircraft, which they used primarily for their London and Paris routes.

Malaysia-A380
Malaysia Airlines A380

Following the terrible tragedies of MH370 and MH17, Malaysia Airlines has been forced to restructure and downsize, and as part of that they’ve retired their entire 777 fleet.

Malaysia-772
Malaysia Airlines 777

That means the only plane which Malaysia Airlines can still operate to many points in Europe is the A380. As of now, Malaysia Airlines just operates their A380s on their two daily flights between Kuala Lumpur and London Heathrow (I’ve reviewed the route in first class from both London to Kuala Lumpur and Kuala Lumpur to London).

Malaysia-First-Class-1
Malaysia Airlines A380 first class

Apparently some of these A380s will soon be going through maintenance, meaning they’ll have a plane shortage. And the airline has a unique solution — Malaysia Airlines will be taking a 747 out of storage and using it as an A380 replacement.

While the exact dates the plane will be operated haven’t yet been announced, the Malaysia 747 is currently getting a new paint job, per pictures in this Reddit thread. It’s pretty cool that Malaysia Airlines is actually giving it a retro livery.

Malaysia-Airlines-747
Malaysia 747 being repainted

Malaysia-Airlines-747-1
Malaysia 747 being repainted

As an aviation geek I love the retro livery, though I suspect the real reason for it is that the airline wants to distance itself more from its previous livery, given the negative connotations people have with it. I suppose Malaysia could have gone with the new livery as well, though this alternative seems more fun.

Now, the million dollar question is why Malaysia Airlines is bringing back the 747. They have six A380s to operate two daily flights to London Heathrow, a service which could easily be operated with only 3-4 A380s. I understand they have to undergo maintenance, but why can’t they do that with the two spare A380s they have?

That’s puzzling, because bringing a 747 back into service seems like an expensive solution. They’re having to repaint the plane, presumably do some maintenance on it, get crews certified on the plane again, adjust capacity, etc. Presumably they knew their A380s needed maintenance, and would have just held off a bit on retiring their 777s, which could have also operated the route.

Malaysia-Airlines-747-First-Class
Malaysia Airlines 747 first class

Bottom line

As an aviation geek I’m super excited about seeing a 747 return to service, and will make a point of trying to fly it.

Nonetheless I simply can’t wrap my head around the logic of this decision, given how cash-strapped Malaysia Airlines is. They’re already inefficiently utilizing their A380s, so how they can’t operate two flights a day to London with six A380s (even with one or two in maintenance) is beyond me. And if they couldn’t, you’d think they would have just delayed the retirement of one or two 777s, rather than bringing a 747 back into service.

I’m sure there’s something obvious I’m missing, because Malaysia’s CEO, Christoph Mueller, is a very bright guy…

Anyone as excited/confused about Malaysia bringing back the 747 as I am?

Conversations (20)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

marcus Guest

I've seen the 747 on the tarmac at KLIA but has anyone actually flown it anywhere? I haven't heard of anyone who has done so. I think it may be a prop for a film? Anyone know?

0
‼ 0
Ed Guest

Spotted at KLIA today https://s32.postimg.org/dy4sgeqv9/20160625_152741.jpg https://s32.postimg.org/mufkkchhh/20160625_151859.jpg

0
‼ 0
marcus Guest

Just a head's up, it's now called MAB. Or that's the abbrieviation for Malaysia Airlines Bhd. Some thoughts 1) MAB was trying to sell off the 2 surplus A380s and may already have done so although that would have been a bit daft if they knew the other 2 were about to go in for a major overhaul 2) Isn't it a bit soon for these aircraft to get a major overhaul? I thought the first major overhaul for commercial aircraft is now 7 years? 3) There are plenty of aircraft out there available for lease that at a fraction of the cost of refitting and getting certification for one (only one?) 747 would do a better job. 4) If they are intending to use the 747s for commercial routes, I doubt it'll be to London. More likely to be for charter flights from China or Russia or for the Haj/Umrah. 5) Don't forget the A380 uses special gates/bridges etc at KLIA/Heathrow. They will have long term contracts to use these gates that will be more expensive than normal gates and will still have to be paid for as will new gates for the 747s, if Heathrow has any available at the time MAB lands/departs. Although I say so myself, this is what Malaysia Airlines needs to do if it is serious about rebranding. https://brandconsultantasia.com/2014/03/03/how-malaysia-airlines-can-rebuild-its-troubled-brand/

0
‼ 0
Azizan Z Guest

Expensive plane to start with. Generally low competitive fare and high operating cost no way can the airline to make money with only 1 flight per day per plane. Do the math.

0
‼ 0
PY Guest

@Steven Schwartz has a point there. Reviving the confidence in MAS is important especially both incidents were 777 and lots in SEA are still very superstitious. Fuel is definitely cheap now but anyone know what's the consumption difference? I can only find the comparison between A380 and 747-8, and I don't think MAS has any 747-8s.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT