Oops: KLM’s 11 Hour Flight To Nowhere

Some KLM passengers had a very long flight to nowhere yesterday.

KLM flight 685 was supposed to fly from Amsterdam to Mexico City. The flight ended up taking around 11 hours, as usual, though passengers didn’t end up in Mexico City. Rather they ended up in Amsterdam, right where they started.

The Boeing 747-400 operating the flight turned around when it was already over North America, meaning it crossed the Atlantic twice.

Believe it or not, situations like this actually aren’t that uncommon, as there’s a story like this several times per year.

So, what happened? As KLM explained the situation in a Tweet:

The reason for the return was the unfavourable flying conditions above Mexico after activity of the volcano Popocatepetl. Our apologies for the inconvenience.

Indeed, Mexico’s Popocatépetl volcano erupted yesterday, and volcano eruptions can have big impacts on air travel. Many may remember in 2010 when Iceland’s Eyjafjallajökull volcano erupted, causing the biggest disruption to international air travel since 9/11.

So why wouldn’t KLM just divert to Canada or the US, given that this would have saved them about five hours of flying? Well, because landing at a foreign outstation in a country different than where you originated causes all kinds of other potential issues:

  • Many passengers may not have been able to get visas to enter Canada or the US, so people may have then been stranded on the plane
  • Once the plane was on the ground, it’s unlikely that the crew would have been able to continue flying after waiting for a while, since they would have “timed out”
  • Rebooking an entire 747 worth of people, not to mention finding accommodation for them, is significantly more challenging at an outstation than at a hub

As a result, KLM went with the safe option and flew everyone back to Amsterdam.

But there’s actually a further wrinkle. Reports suggest that there were two dozen horses on the plane as well, and having them involved with a diversion would have complicated things even further.

While this was no doubt inconvenient for everyone involved (and very costly for KLM), I 100% trust their judgment here, that they acted to the best of their ability. You never know how bad these eruptions will be, and the situation could have been much worse.

Now, in fairness, many other airlines flew from Europe to Mexico City yesterday without disruptions. However, they left at different times, had access to different information, and probably didn’t have horses.

Yes, an 11 hour flight to nowhere is quite a story and is inconvenient, but an airline should never be faulted for erring on the side of caution, in my opinion.

Conversations (46)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Jack Guest

Just had this happen on Iceland Air. It was crazy windy in Iceland and we were closer to our destination in Norway (and even closer to the Bergan airport). For some reason we turned around and flew back to Iceland, where we could barely walk down the steps to deplane. They will not disclose why we turned around, and especially won't tell us why they didn't just land in nearby Bergan, which was way closer and also in the same country we were flying to anyway. Then they had us change planes and then they had us wait for over an hour while they searched the luggage for somebody that hadn't made the second plane. I still want to know why this happened and if there was a problem, why they didn't land at the closest airport since they claim it was for our own safety and also claimed that Iceland was the closest place to land, though it absolutely was not

0
‼ 0
Julian Guest

Those asking about diversion airports, none available in Mexico that could handle the horses. Landing elsewhere means not only potential paperwork problems for the pax but again also the horses and can lead to quarantines etc. so they really had to no choice. Difficult decision for the crew and ops people to take given the pax inconvenience it causes but it is what it is. This won't happen anymore once the 747s have phased out in the near future.

0
‼ 0
Jo145 Member

@Matt, straight from the horses mouth ... I want to know if the horses earn points.

0
‼ 0
warren trout Guest

No, airlines and airports don't keep horse people on hand in case a plane diverts there!

0
‼ 0
Matt Guest

Were the horses for emotional support? But, seriously, don't tell me places like Guadalajara cannot handle horses!

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published