Oh My: Ghana Threatens British Airways Over “Unfavorable” Gatwick Flight

British Airways plans to make some changes to its Ghana service, and the country isn’t happy about it…

Why Ghana is angry at British Airways

As of March 28, 2021, British Airways plans to operate its daily service to Accra from Gatwick Airport rather than from Heathrow Airport. The airline justified this move by explaining that only 18% of travelers on the route are traveling for business reasons, and British Airways uses Gatwick more as its leisure airport.

However, Ghana’s government seems to be taking offense to this change, with the Accra flight being moved to London’s less prestigious airport. The government feels that this is unfavorable towards Ghanaian passengers, and is angry that the decision was made unilaterally.

The Ministry of Aviation has sent British Airways a letter threatening to take reciprocal action. In other words, if British Airways wants to transfer the Ghana flight to Gatwick, then the airline will be required to use another airport in Ghana.

As the Ministry of Aviation explains:

“For the avoidance of doubt, we are unable to accept the change in the London-Accra-London flights originating from Gatwick Airport.

We are not convinced about the reasons for the movement of the Accra-bound BA service from Heathrow to Gatwick Airport and thus strongly object to the changes.

In this regard, we wish to state unequivocally, that the Ghanaian authorities will advise itself and take a reciprocal action on behalf of our passengers in the coming days if our call for British Airways to rescind its decision on the movement to Gatwick Airport is not heeded.”

There’s only one small problem with the Ministry of Aviation’s threat — Kotoka International Airport (ACC) in Accra is the only major international airport in the country.

I’m not really sure what the Ministry of Aviation is threatening here. Obviously, the government is hoping that a threat is enough to make British Airways change its mind, but what happens otherwise? It would seem to me that the only real recourse that Ghana has it to force British Airways to suspend flights to the country.

Ghana doesn’t want British Airways’ flight to operate out of Gatwick

This isn’t the first British Airways & Ghana spat

Back in 2017, Ghana’s president met with British Airways’ head of sales in the region, to express frustration over the carrier’s operation in the country. Specifically, he wasn’t happy that the Accra flight was operated out of Heathrow’s Terminal 3 (rather than Terminal 5), and also didn’t like the 747 being used for the route:

“People complain about the movement (of flights to and from Accra) from Terminal five to Terminal three at Heathrow. Terminal three is not so convenient place as Terminal five. There are also complaints about the quality of the planes on the route and the service. In some quarters, there is a feeling that you are taking us a little for granted in the way in which we are receiving your services.”

I think on an occasion like this, for when friends are speaking, I think we should speak frankly. I think I am the proper person to let you know what the pre-occupations of our people are. These are matters that will be easy for you to rectify.”

The British Airways 747 that Ghana wasn’t happy with

Bottom line

Ghana’s government isn’t happy that British Airways is changing its Accra service from Heathrow to Gatwick, arguing it’s “unfavorable” towards passengers. The country is threatening reciprocity in the form of requiring the airline to operate to a different airport in Ghana. The only issue is that ACC is currently the only major international airport in the country.

What do you think — will British Airways give in to the Ministry of Aviation, or will the airline call its bluff?

Conversations (61)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Fed UP Guest

hahaha, how about this... BA should just say, we are dropping Ghana service, find somebody else to fly...

0
‼ 0
Jon Guest

Petros is right Ghanaians need strick operation rules to keep them under principles The gov of Ghana must heed and pay attention to such observations

0
‼ 0
Jon Guest

Britain must show more respect to commonwealth nations and give them better previlages. The kingdom holds up better with the commonwealth and should not be taken for grant ( in these era of times)

0
‼ 0
Petros Guest

I operated many flights to Ghana in the past decade, usually we had delays, passengers were late checking in, they always had too much hold baggage and didn't want to pay the excess, the "hand baggage" was the size of a small wardrobe, they complained the seats were small but in reality they were too large. Arriving back to LHR late was an issue with holding and slots, all in all Gatwick would be a more flexible option as passengers can be rounded up well in advance and given the rail service directly to the terminal it should make life easier all round. The other issue is contraband, LHR was so busy many pax just walked right through customs, at LGW they don't have the volumes and more attention can be given to "certain areas". In 10 years I probably had at least 3 deaths in flight with drugs being swallowed and breaking in stomachs and at least the same attempts at child smuggling, with the so called "mothers" claiming illness on landing to try and get expedited through without questions. If BA want to change airports for commercial reasons, it's up to them and nothing to do with Ghana government. Their own airline had safety and operation problems, fuelled by corruption in governments, they should be grateful there are any flights from the UK. Hopefully they can rebuild an airline structure in the future but hiring back "old staff" to fly new 787 is like giving Dracula the keys to the blood bank. Of course they are a proud nation and have strong ties with the Uk that we should respect, however, put your own house in order before criticising others.

0
‼ 0
Ian cam Guest

I use both Heathrow and Gatwick. And to be honest I prefer Gatwick if you are not hubbing. Which maybe the Ghana Government grip. For VFR I would have thought Gatwick is fine. I find the journey to victoria pretty good whereas you either get Hex and tube from paddington or tube directly from central terminal to central London. So it’s a bit more contrived from LHR. Cross rail will eventually help I suppose . Anyway I don’t think it’s a massive issue to be honest.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published