Qatar Airways Argues It’s Unethical To Fly The A380

Here’s an interesting argument from Qatar Airways regarding its current fleet strategy.

Qatar Airways has grounded its A380 fleet…

Like many airlines around the world, Qatar Airways has grounded its A380 fleet. This makes sense, given the lack of demand for global travel at the moment.

What I find interesting is an email I just received from a Qatar Airways PR representative, who wanted to see if I was interested in covering a story about the ethics of flying the A380 amidst the current pandemic. Suffice to say that I was intrigued.

Qatar Airways is the first airline in the Middle East, and just the fifth airline in the world, to secure the highest level of accreditation in the International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) Environmental Assessment Program.

The pitch goes on to state that Qatar Airways has decided to ground its fleet of 10 Airbus A380s during the pandemic, instead focusing on utilizing its fleet of 30 Boeing 787s and 49 Airbus A350s.

Using these planes make sense, since they best meet current demand. As it’s described, this allows the airline to remain nimble, and upgrade and downgrade each route based on passenger demand and travel restrictions.

Qatar Airways is currently operating its A350 fleet

…for environmental reasons?!

What I find interesting about the argument is that it’s claimed that “the company believes it is not commercially or environmentally justifiable to operate such a large aircraft in the current market.”

This is supported by explaining that benchmark figures identified that Qatar Airways’ fleet of A350s consumes half the fuel per block hour compared to the A380, which translates to a difference of 20 tons of CO2 per block hour.

Qatar Airways’ entire A380 fleet is grounded right now

Why I find this to be so interesting

I totally get why Qatar Airways has grounded its A380 fleet, and that makes sense for commercial reasons. But the fact that the company is specifically trying to pitch stories about the ethics of operating the A380 right now is noteworthy, and can’t help but come across as a bit of a dig at Emirates, which recently restarted A380 operations, after grounding the fleet for months.

Airlines have long made environmental arguments that suit their agendas. For example:

  • Lufthansa’s CEO has argued that “flights for less than 10EUR shouldn’t exist,” because they’re “economically, ecologically, and politically irresponsible”
  • Wizz Air’s CEO has argued that business class should be banned on most flights to reduce emissions, arguing that Wizz Air has the lowest per passenger emissions among its competitors

Airlines make environmental arguments that suit their agendas

In many ways environmental arguments have fallen by the wayside during the current pandemic. In the past airlines were shamed for emissions, while right now airlines are being shamed when they don’t block seats for additional distancing, which obviously means that per passenger emissions are much higher than usual.

Is flying the A380 environmentally unjustifiable, or is it actually justifiable in terms of the additional spacing it would provide passengers?

There’s certainly some irony to Qatar Airways arguing routes are environmentally unsuitable, when this is the same airline that has launched more than one route to “rub salt in the wound” of competitors.

Bottom line

Like many other airlines, Qatar Airways has grounded its A380 fleet. While that makes perfect sense, I’m a bit puzzled by the decision to specifically start promoting to the media that flying the A380 is unethical.

It’s a strange time for environmentalism in the airline industry. We spent so many years talking about how airlines need to reduce emissions, while now airlines that are selling planes to capacity are being shamed.

What do you make of Qatar Airways’ perspective on the ethics of flying the A380?

Conversations (45)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Jon M Guest

Thanks, but I'll skip the ethics lecture from an arm of the Qatari government.

0
‼ 0
warren trout Guest

Simply appealing to the left political wing. To the left, everything is about moral superiority.

0
‼ 0
Rushton Hunt Guest

Yes, this from the company that is promoting ‘50hrs of private jet travel’ packages. In an era where people are concerned about the environment and are reconsidering private jet travel in favour of commercial services.

0
‼ 0
M. Saeed Guest

Why not use only 2 engines of A380 while at its cruising height, depending upon the load?

0
‼ 0
gebbie Guest

The A380 is significantly less efficient per seat than the A350. Mostly due to the design being overweight but also the engines are a generation behind and the aerodynamics are poor due to a low aspect ratio and an oversized wing area. You only have to look at the raw figures to get an idea of the weight problem. Qatar's A380s hold 517 passengers & MTOW is 575,000kgs which means the A380 has to propel 1112kgs of weight per passenger. Qatar's A350-1000s hold 327 passengers & MTOW is 317,000kgs so it only has to propel 969kgs per passenger. Running 4 engines instead of two has nothing to do with it either. The 787-8 is pretty much bang on for having half the passenger capacity of the A380. Running two 787-8s meanings you're running 4 engines but it's still a lot cheaper than a single A380 (it's weight per passenger is even less than A350 though is carrying less fuel per passenger at MTOW due to lower range) Another thing to note is that the A380's underbelly cargo volume is very low. It's actually less than a single A350. It can only hold 32 LD3 containers while the A350-1000 can take 44.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published