Virgin Atlantic Leaving Gatwick, Retiring 747s, Laying Off 3,150 Staff

Virgin Atlantic is still looking for a lifeline, as the airline is weeks away from running out of money. In the meantime, the airline has today revealed what they call the “post-COVID-19 future,” and it involves some drastic cuts.

Virgin Atlantic notes that the business will be reshaped and resized, with the expectation that it will take up to three years to return to 2019 levels.

Virgin Atlantic CEO Shai Weiss describes the current crisis as the most devastating in the company’s 36 year history. He still hopes the company will return to profitability in 2021.

Therefore Virgin Atlantic is announcing some massive cutbacks, so let’s look at the details.

Virgin Atlantic will retire Boeing 747-400s

Effective immediately, Virgin Atlantic will retire their fleet of seven Boeing 747-400s. Ugh, another airline retires the queen of the skies. This means that the airline will exclusively have twin engine planes going forward.

Virgin Atlantic will also retire four A330-200s in early 2022 as planned, meaning that by 2022 the airline will only have A330-300s, 787-9s, and A350-1000s.

At that point Virgin Atlantic’s fleet will have just 36 aircraft, creating a further 10% cut in emissions. The airline has already reduced emissions by 18% between 2007 and 2019.

The airline does also have A330-900neos on order, expected to be delivered between 2021 and 2024, though there’s no mention of those.

Virgin Atlantic will have a simplified fleet

Virgin Atlantic will leave London Gatwick

Currently Virgin Atlantic operates flights out of London Heathrow, London Gatwick, and Manchester. Historically Gatwick has been one of Virgin Atlantic’s leisure airports, with flights primarily to Caribbean destinations.

Going forward, Virgin Atlantic will be pulling out of Gatwick, so will exclusively operate flights out of Heathrow and Manchester. Gatwick flying will be moved to Heathrow, though also expect some route reductions to correspond with the 747s being retired.

Virgin Atlantic hopes to retain slots at Gatwick so the airline can return in line with customer demand, though no matter what the airline is leaving the airport for now. Without the fleet growing otherwise, the airline seems unlikely to return.

This is a huge blow to Gatwick Airport, especially as British Airways is reportedly also looking at ending or at least reducing flights to the airport. If nothing else, I think it’s safe to assume British Airways is in a good negotiating spot with the airport now.

Virgin Atlantic 747Virgin Atlantic will no longer fly to Gatwick

Virgin Atlantic laying off staff

This is the saddest news of all. Virgin Atlantic plans on laying off 3,150 employees across all functions. The airline currently has just over 8,500 employees, so that represents a huge reduction.

A company wide consultation period of 45 days is starting today, and will involve unions BALPA and Unite.

Virgin Atlantic will be laying off over 3,000 staff

Bottom line

Virgin Atlantic will be retiring 747s, pulling out of Gatwick, and laying off about 35% of staff. How sad. Even with these measures, the company’s future is far from guaranteed, as the airline is still weeks from running out of money.

I love Virgin Atlantic, and in particular their staff. I hope the airline returns stronger than ever before when this is all said and done.

What do you make of this announcement from Virgin Atlantic?

Conversations (35)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

The nice Paul Diamond

@UpperDeckJohnny Crossrail will destroy most of your arguments about worse rail connectivity from LHR when it opens later this year, followed by the Western rail access project to give direct trains into LHR from the Thames Valley (and beyond, from Bristol/Cardiff/etc). Even so, it depends where you live or want to visit. I’m in East Anglia, so Thameslink to LGW (and direct trains to Stansted) always beat LHR. But even where I have a choice, the vast majority of my intercontinental flights depart LHR not LGW. There’s just more choice and greater volume from LHR, and that cancels any time saving from LGW’s better rail connections. For all sorts of reasons, BA would be insane to abandon LHR for LGW.

0
‼ 0
UpperDeckJohnny Guest

If VS and BA are going to do anything, they should both ditch third world LHR (except Terminal 5, a train ride away from connecting flights that aren't BA) LGW has far better rail links, in every direction and into two mainline stations in London. LHR has only the crowded, slow tube from its terminus LHR. Nothing goes west. Only London OR take the train to Paddington (where?) and have to then take the tube to travel into central london. Why LGW appears not to be able to fight their corner, I do not know. The airport's not great, and could be better. (and there's ample land around to completely rebuild, which LHR will never have, being in the middle of a surbiban area. Whenever I fly to London on EK, I choose LGW over LHR every time. Anyone with thoughts?

0
‼ 0
ChrisC Guest

@Gertie - You can't buy the Virgin name and logo. You pay Virgin Group a 'use' fee - Like Virgin Mobile do - they pay to use the Virgin name but have no other links to the Virgin Group such as ownership. As for local councils having plenty of money what world you are living in?? Yes Manchester Airport is owned by a group of local authorities and a private company parter but it is run on a commercial basis.

0
‼ 0
gertie Guest

I think Virgin will stay, now if they do go bump, who ever buys them needs to be careful, as ik don,t know if you know the staory of Rolls and Bentley cars, VW and BMW bought them, but one did not buy the Rolls name, I can,tq remember, but they need to buy the Virgin Logo, Myself, I think Gove will loan, and also Delta put in more, they are awaiting, to see whats going on, Also has anyone thought, we may (UK) not need new London runway for a while, Manchester Airport will do OK, as Coucils own most of it and will put funds in(they hasve plenty) then the mad car paek fees will get their funds back in no time, when they are up and running,

0
‼ 0
FNT Delta Diamond Guest

I sure hope Virgin Atlantic doesn't eliminate its exceptional soft product from the club lounge to the better quality wine to the VIP services. It's what sets Virgin apart from Delta or KLM when flying across the Atlantic as a Delta elite. Only Air France has comparable food and wine. But even then the Air France lounges are weak, except for first-class.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published