Report: Etihad Seeking $600 Million Loan

Etihad has been struggling financially for quite a while, and is undergoing a restructuring, as we see them try to increase revenue and cut costs.

The airline has lost nearly 5 billion USD in the past three years. This includes a loss of 1.28 billion USD in 2018, which is awful when you consider how many cost reduction initiatives the airline already undertook.

The airline is owned by the government of Abu Dhabi, and for many years it seemed like the government was willing to pour an unlimited amount of money into the airline, and viewed it as a vanity project.

But there’s no denying that over time that trend has changed, and increasingly Abu Dhabi is keeping the airline on a tighter leash. The results of this have been significant:

Well, it looks like even with their more conservative approach, the airline will now have to look for money from sources other than the government.

Skift is reporting that Etihad is allegedly seeking a loan of about 600 million USD to help make initial payments for planes that they have on order. While an Etihad spokesperson hasn’t officially commented, Skift quotes “people familiar with the matter.”

If true, the airline has gone from getting virtually unlimited funding from the government, to being under closer scrutiny from the government, to now seeking outside financing.

They recently canceled 61 widebody orders, including Airbus A350s and Boeing 777-9s, though the airline still has a few of the planes on order, along with Boeing 787s.

So the fact that they’re seeking an outside loan for their already scaled back fleet plans is noteworthy. I’ll be curious to see how this plays out…

Conversations (24)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

The nice Paul Diamond

@ Eskimo Reminds me of the joke in an ancient comedy series where one of three friends won $100,000 in a lottery. The 2 others come back a week later and find the winner broke. “How did you spend $100,000 in a week?!” He replied: “well, half of it went on booze and prostitutes. But the other half I just wasted”. I’m not sure into which category you’d put “investing in Etihad”.

0
‼ 0
kyall Guest

@eskimo, Thanks for your effort in hiur response, Im unfamiliar with U.S lotto and tax as I'm on a different continent, Clearly I was making a joke alsi

0
‼ 0
Traveler New Member

@callum - don‘t underestimate the amount of back-office and operational savings plus schedule alignments that could be generated by such a combination. It also helps that both key cities (Dubai and Abu Dhabi) continue to have a significant amount of direct flights. For someone in Europe flying to Australia, it won‘t matter if they fly LHR-AUH-SYD or LHR-DXB-SYD if they have to change planes anyway. A combined „United Emirates“ might offer flights every 2 hours from LHR.

0
‼ 0
callum Guest

Ray - That's exactly how a country works, the bits that are doing well help out the bits that aren't... Plus of course, Abu Dhabi has bailed out Dubai in the not too distant past. Traveler - Having hubs in Abu Dhabi and Dubai makes no sense. They might as well just stay as 2 different airlines if they're going to do that.

0
‼ 0
Eskimo Guest

@Kyall I hope you don't buy lotto regularly. 1. To get 700M after Uncle Sam takes his cut means you need to win over a Billion pre tax. 2. Here is the real kicker, to get that much in lump-sum after tax you probably have to win close to 2 billion. So if you were to win 2 billion in lotto, are you really going to lend money to Etihad and live your normal life while trying to squeeze some freebies from the airline? You know if EY defaults you would set 2 world records. Not only would you win the largest in history, you also end up as the worst lotto winner in history ever. At least others who won and used up all their winnings did get to enjoy the money while it last.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published