Canada No Longer Requires Airlines To Provide Refunds For Flight Cancellations

Canada improved protection for air passengers back in 2019. In light of the current situation, though, the Canadian Transportation Agency is giving airlines a lot of leeway.

Airlines no longer have to provide passengers with refunds

The Canadian Transportation Agency decided yesterday that airlines no longer have to provide passengers with cash refunds if flights are cancelled.

In light of the current situation threatening the economic viability of airlines, the CTA has decided that it’s appropriate for airlines to instead provide vouchers for future travel in lieu of refunds, assuming they don’t “expire in an unreasonably short period of time,” which is considered to be 24 months.

Here’s the explanation from the CTA (the bolding is mine):

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in domestic and international air travel.

For flight disruptions that are outside an airline’s control, the Canada Transportation Act and Air Passenger Protection Regulations only require that the airline ensure passengers can complete their itineraries. Some airlines’ tariffs provide for refunds in certain cases, but may have clauses that airlines believe relieve them of such obligations in force majeure situations.

The legislation, regulations, and tariffs were developed in anticipation of relatively localized and short-term disruptions. None contemplated the sorts of worldwide mass flight cancellations that have taken place over recent weeks as a result of the pandemic. It’s important to consider how to strike a fair and sensible balance between passenger protection and airlines’ operational realities in these extraordinary and unprecedented circumstances.

On the one hand, passengers who have no prospect of completing their planned itineraries with an airline’s assistance should not simply be out-of-pocket for the cost of cancelled flights. On the other hand, airlines facing huge drops in passenger volumes and revenues should not be expected to take steps that could threaten their economic viability.

While any specific situation brought before the CTA will be examined on its merits, the CTA believes that, generally speaking, an appropriate approach in the current context could be for airlines to provide affected passengers with vouchers or credits for future travel, as long as these vouchers or credits do not expire in an unreasonably short period of time (24 months would be considered reasonable in most cases).

The CTA will continue to provide information, guidance, and services to passengers and airlines as we make our way through this challenging period.

Both Air Canada and WestJet policies are now exclusively allowing for future flight credits valid for 24 months when a flight is cancelled.

Air Canada no longer has to provide refunds

This is obviously all very complicated

Here in the US we’ve seen airlines try to get away with not providing refunds for cancellations (hey, United!), even though that violates Department of Transportation regulations. As consumers, government regulations are only so useful when frontline airline employees aren’t empowered to follow them:

  • You can file a complaint with the DOT, but that’s not going to get you a resolution within minutes (or hours, or days, or probably even weeks)
  • Airlines may at some point in the future be fined for violations, but that’s not something that really benefits consumers directly

This current situation does raise some interesting questions — DOT regulations apply for flights to or from the USA, while CTA regulations similarly apply for Canadian flights.

If you booked a flight from Canada to the US, which rule applies? Well, the truth is that it probably doesn’t matter, because you’re not going to convince a frontline employee to give you a refund if that’s not the company’s policy.

WestJet no longer has to provide refunds

Bottom line

Many airlines have been trying to skirt government regulations to avoid giving passengers refunds. In the case of Canada, the CTA has now decided that airlines don’t actually need to refund passengers if they cancel flights, but rather only have to provide a future flight voucher.

It’ll be interesting to see if other governments follow similar policies…

Conversations (67)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

cindy Guest

I purchased 5 business class tickets from US to Copenhangen for cruise that was to begin May 29th. The flights are completely cancelled. Air Canada is going to charge me $275 per tickets unless I take the voucher. That is $1375 total! If I take the voucher I have to use it all at once, so all 5 of us would have to travel together again at the sometime ( might not be possible as kids are all young professionals) Also, if I move the date to one year later the cost of the ticket is $1000 more for the exact same route. So I either have to pay $5000 more for the exact same ticket OR lose $1375 if I take the refund. How is this fair? If they are going to refuse refunds on cancelled flights at the very lease they should price protect the exact same route. They are screwing us twice. Once by forcing us to take the voucher and again by raising the cost of the new ticket so that they hit you again. Oh, and if we dropped down to coach so as not to have to pay the additional $5000, then they would keep the cost difference. This is a no win situation. I think I am going to just take the $1375 hit rather than be held hostage to this airline from ever how much more money they can get from me. This was a family splurge to celebrate a milestone. Never have I bought business class tickets for the family before.

0
‼ 0
Emily Guest

I purchased a RT ticket that was to leave today on AC. Windsor to Toronto to Amsterdam. Return was to be in 5 weeks from Paris to Toronto to Windsor (study abroad program). AC canceled all flights. I am 20 and spent almost $1,000 on these flights. I saved and saved for it. I can’t use it in next 24 months Due to school and work commitments and now I lost over 25% of my purchase price. Being near a Detroit, I should have picked a US Airline who would have provided a full refund. I thought I was saving a little money but it ended up costing me. No more flying on Canadian airlines for me.....not with the risk.

0
‼ 0
Brandyn Guest

Does USA DOT rules not apply to Air Canada if the flight is from the USA to Canada? Because DOT says we should be given a refund for any plane that leaves from the US, but I feel Air Canada is disregarding the fact that they have planes in the U.S. Maybe the shouldn't be allowed to have business in the U.S. then if they can't follow USA DOT regulations?

0
‼ 0
Ann Guest

Our Air Canada one way non-refundable 1st class flight Vancouver to Los Angeles on 5/26 was cancelled and rebooked to another flight 3 different times by AC, the current flight being 6 3/4 hrs earlier than our original flight. Our flight from Los Angeles on American at the beginning of the trip was just canceled and refunded. We would like to cancel the AC return flight if we can get a refund, as we have no confidence that we will have a need for or even want to use a credit with Air Canada in the next 24 months. However, the AC agent I spoke to regarding a refund said our flight was not cancelled, just "rescheduled" and the US DOT Enforcement Notice Regarding Refunds did not apply to Canadian airlines. What's my next step, or am I screwed?

0
‼ 0
neil reid Guest

act of god - so what. business is a risk. stuff happens some good, some bad some very bad. a contract is entered into and then the terms of that contract are retro actively altered to protect one party’s continued viability to the detriment of the other party. no different than a builder taking a 100 percent deposit to fix your roof then keeping the cash because he is very ill and the building association defends this because his business may go bust but dont worry he will do it in two years only by then u live in an apartment so its kinda pointless. this is very bad - a society is built on the rule of law or at least the belief there is obvious justice at hand - otherwise there is anarchy.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT