Holy Smokes: United Airlines Flights Are EMPTY

Obviously global demand for travel is way down. Not only are most airlines canceling a majority of their flights, but even those flights that are still operating are quite empty.

For example, United has indicated that even after canceling flights, they expect most flights to be 20-30% full. Well, it looks like that may have been super optimistic (and that makes me happy that people are staying home, even if it is putting the economy on pause).

Just how empty are United Airlines flights?

Monday morning is usually a peak travel time, so how full are flights this morning? This is especially interesting to look at for domestic flights, given that there aren’t any government restrictions at the moment on flying domestically within the US. Rather there’s just social shame for anyone who chooses to take a flight unnecessarily, as there should be. 😉

It’s easiest to use United as an example for how full flights are, because United is the only one of the “big three” US carriers that publishes seatmaps on their website even after flights leave.

They show these details on the “flight status” section, so it’s easy to figure out just how empty flights are. I assume other airlines are equally empty, but United just makes it easiest for us to figure out these details.

@AirlineFlyer notes just how empty one flight is from New York to Chicago (Jason has provided some awesome coverage throughout all of this), so I figured it would be interesting to look at a wide array of flights, to see just how empty they are.

In no particular order, here are the details (and keep in mind this is after many flights have been canceled, and presumably flights have largely been consolidated):

Newark to Los Angeles

This morning’s 6AM Newark to Los Angeles flight was canceled, while the 7AM flight was operated by a 787-10. How full was that flight, UA240?

  • 6/44 business class seats were taken
  • 0/21 premium economy seats were taken
  • 11/45 extra legroom economy seats were taken
  • 17/199 economy seats were taken

That means there were 34 passengers on a plane with 309 seats, meaning the flight had an ~11% load factor.

San Francisco to Newark

This morning’s 6AM San Francisco to Newark flight was canceled, while the 7:15AM flight was operated by a 787-10. How full was that flight, UA577?

  • 10/44 business class seats were taken
  • 0/21 premium economy seats were taken
  • 0/45 extra legroom economy seats were taken
  • 27/199 economy seats were taken

That means there were 37 passengers on a plane with 309 seats, meaning the flight had a ~12% load factor.

New York LaGuardia to Chicago

This morning’s 6AM LaGuardia to Chicago flight was canceled, while the 7AM flight was operated by an A319. How full was that flight, UA600?

  • 2/12 first class seats were taken
  • 1/36 extra legroom economy seats were taken
  • 11/78 economy seats were taken

That means there were 14 passengers on a plane with 126 seats, meaning the flight had an ~11% load factor.

Chicago to Newark

This morning’s 6:05AM Chicago to Newark flight was operated by an A319. How full was that flight, UA636?

  • 8/12 first class seats were taken
  • 4/36 extra legroom economy seats were taken
  • 2/78 economy seats were taken

That means there were 14 passengers on a plane with 126 seats, meaning the flight had an ~11% load factor.

Boston to San Francisco

This morning’s 6AM Boston to San Francisco flight was operated by a 757-200. How full was that flight, UA433?

  • 2/16 business class seats were taken
  • 0/45 extra legroom economy seats were taken
  • 7/108 economy seats were taken

That means there were nine passengers on a plane with 169 seats, meaning the flight had a ~5% load factor.

San Francisco to Los Angeles

This morning’s 6:44AM San Francisco to Los Angeles flight was operated by an A320. How full was that flight, UA504?

  • 7/12 first class seats were taken
  • 7/42 extra legroom economy seats were taken
  • 7/96 economy seats were taken

That means there were 21 passengers on a plane with 150 seats, meaning the flight had a ~14% load factor.

Bottom line

This must be an absolute bloodbath for airlines. But kudos to most people for staying home, at least…

The above are literally just flights I randomly chose without an agenda. It seems that on average flights are more like ~10% full, rather than ~20-30% full.

Bonus points to anyone who can either find a nearly full domestic United flight, or one that operated but is even emptier than the above!

Are you surprised by how empty United flights are?

Conversations (100)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Adam Guest

Like others have suggested, it seems to me that a (the?) key reason U.S. carriers are operating empty wide-bodies is that those planes are actually full below-deck. Cargo rates have skyrocketed as capacity dries up, meaning it may well be profitable for the airlines to operate these flights. That’s probably especially true for the transatlantic operations, explaining why EWR-TLV remains a 777-300 instead of a 787-8 or 763. From Air Cargo News on Monday: “Prices from Frankfurt to North America jumped by 56.6% compared with a week earlier to $2.74 per kg, while from Chicago to Europe there was an 87.6% increase to a (Tac Index) record of $2.06 per kg. ”The increases come as carriers have been slashing bellyhold capacity from the market – on the transatlantic it is estimated that belly capacity is down by 90%.” Source: https://www.aircargonews.net/airlines/airfreight-rates-continue-to-rise-as-capacity-crunch-goes-global/

0
‼ 0
airbus capt Guest

Captain for a major here. I survived 9/11 but I'm not so sure about this one (but frankly, it's the least of my worries). I'm supposed to carry around a letter in my pocket saying that shelter-in-place doesn't apply to me. 1000's of pilots and flight attendants live in "crash pads" in NYC and yet we are all exempt from shelter-in-place and the NY-FL quarantine directives....look, we're the ones that are going to spread the disease! I took 4 people from San Jose to Boston the other day. Shut this down for several weeks. Please Washington, make the call, because our illustrious leaders are waiting for you to make the moral decision for them.

0
‼ 0
Dirk Jankewicz Guest

UA1013 SFO-DEN on March 24 was almost 90% occupied.

0
‼ 0
dan Guest

The load factors might suck, but I bet the belly is full of cargo. Cargo space is at a premium right now.

0
‼ 0
Karl Guest

UA 1671 ORD-SXM on Saturday (21 March) was 2/12 in F and 0/114 in Y. The two in F were the pilots who flew the return flight so zero paying customers.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published