Is This The Most Restrictive Airline Lounge Access Policy?

Lounge access policies can be rather complicated. Some airline executives in charge of lounges don’t even know the correct policies.

Obviously airlines are all over the place in terms of “generosity” when it comes to lounge access.

British Airways only allows their own first class passengers into The Concorde Room, and not oneworld first class or oneworld Emerald passengers.

British-Airways-Concorde-Room-London-09

Lufthansa only allows their own first class passengers and HON Circle members (and United Global Services members under limited circumstances) into The Lufthansa First Class Terminal & Lounges, and not other Star Alliance first class passengers.

Lufthansa-FCT

Singapore Airlines only allows those departing in Singapore Airlines first class into The Private Room.

Singapore-Airlines-Private-Room-13

And all of those policies are fair enough, because the airlines clearly publish them. They have every right to be more restrictive than other airlines.

Swiss’ lounge access policy is the most restrictive

When it comes to the stingiest imaginable lounge access policies, I think Swiss takes the cake. This ridiculous policy has been in place for a long time, though it just occurred to me that I had never written about it.

While the above airlines all have restrictions in place about having to fly the actual airline in order to access the first class lounge, Swiss takes it a step further. You can only access the Swiss First Class Lounge in Zurich & Geneva if you’re traveling on a Swiss operated and marketed flight. In other words, if you’re booked on a United codeshare flight operated by Swiss, you’re not allowed to access the lounge.

Swiss-First-Class-Lounge

That’s the only airline I know of which has such a ridiculous policy. British Airways will let you into The Concorde Room if you’re on a British Airways operated and American marketed flight. Lufthansa will let you into the First Class Terminal if you’re on a Lufthansa operated and United marketed flight.

But Swiss won’t allow someone who spent $12,000 on a one-way first class ticket for a flight operated by Swiss into their own first class lounge if it was issued as a codeshare.

Swiss-Cost

Worst of all, they don’t even publish this policy on their website, but rather it’s something that passengers on codeshares have to find out the hard way.

Swiss-First-Lounge-Access

I think FlyerTalk member IAN-UK‘s reaction to being denied lounge access is pretty hilarious:

After I’d been refused F-lounge entry on a Swiss operated code-share with a revenue ticket, I put together a (very nice) lunch to take on board the SFO flight, complete with a bottle of wine.

On board, the MdC was mortified when I explained I’d been told only SWISS passengers received SWISS service, and so I’d brought my own lunch. She pledged to write a full report. And I enjoyed my picnic.

Hah!

What’s the logic behind Swiss’ policy?

In theory I can understand the logic behind what Swiss is doing. They want to encourage you to book directly with them rather than as a codeshare flight. Presumably there’s more revenue sharing involved when you’re ticketed through another airline as a codeshare rather than by the same airline you’re flying.

Still, for that incentive to be denying passengers access to a lounge is sort of preposterous. The next logical step would be for them to only offer the full onboard service to passengers traveling on Swiss marketed flights and not codeshares.

Swiss-First-Class-2

What’s the marginal cost of one extra person in the first class lounge? It’s just ridiculous…

Bottom line

While I appreciate the concept of an airline wanting to create an incentive to book directly with them, this isn’t the way to do it. This is possibly the single most arrogant lounge access policy I know of. Denying a full fare first class passenger traveling on your airline lounge access because they’re on a codeshare is a new low, in my opinion. And the fact that they don’t even publish the policy and leave people to find out the hard way is even worse.

What do you make of Swiss’ restrictive lounge access policy for codeshare passengers? 

Conversations (39)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Dan Guest

Hi, Is this still the case? I am thinking of booking SYD-VIE in F, first leg SQ to SIN, then SIN-ZRH in LX F. Only SQ sells the flight I want departing SYD (new SQ Suites), Swiss does not sell it, therefore SIN-ZRH although operated by LX has a SQ codeshare flight number. I would like to access the LX FCL in ZRH before the flight to VIE (for the "hotel room"). Will I be able to with a SQ flight number even though operated by LX? thanks

0
‼ 0
Manfred Guest

David, thanks so much again for the quick and informative reply! Excellent (makes sense - which forum would you recommend?), if I may ask you also more specific questions based on your experience then: 1) can you shed some light on LH vs LX (and/or vs. OS) in terms of business and first class? 2) there are rumors that LX F lounge serves cheese fondue in cold months...is that true?! I only know LH and my research so far shows the following (with regards to PVG-ZRH as e.g. it does not have new business class for LX yet): J in this order: OS (superior food), LX (better seats), LH (not good which I know well...) F in this order: LH (really good product, but food is hit/miss which I can confirm), LX (also great, but not as good as LH?), OS no F product Would you be able to confirm this?

0
‼ 0
David Guest

I have used the ZRH LX F lounge as arrivals lounge myself (ZRH is my homebase), and I know of others who have done the same - no issues there. Definitely no problem using it after arriving in F and then continuing on a flight in a "lower" class. In a recent post on Flyertalk, the LX lurker also confirmed: "You're welcome to use the [First Class] lounge at departure and arrival of the FCL flight" (as this is the comment section of a blog, I recommend you use online forums for further questions, you may get more responses)

0
‼ 0
Manfred Guest

@David Thank you very much for the quick reply - those 2 websites were also my sources...my omission that I did not see LH mentioning arriving flights (was looking at footnote 1 talking about the FCT). LX does not explicitly mention arriving first class flights though? Just wanted to double-check with you knowledgeable people who probably have first-hand experience... Re. the other question: what would you recommend for 1-way PVG-CGN? I'm a LH SEN (thus, wanted to leverage companion award) and currently can't decide whether to go for Y/J/C and which airline...I know LH, but none of the others to know what to book - wdty? Alternatively, I'm currently also Platinum with Delta (but not enough miles for wife and me, so probably need to pay 1 ticket).

0
‼ 0
David Guest

...meant to write "It doesn’t matter what class your _connecting_ flight is in"

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published