Delta Reduces Los Angeles To Auckland Route To Seasonal

I’m not surprised to see Delta making this change, I’m just not sure what the airline was thinking in the first place.

Delta reduces Los Angeles to Auckland service

We’ve seen US airlines add a significant amount of capacity to New Zealand in the past year or so. For example, a year ago, no US airlines flew from Los Angeles (LAX) to Auckland (AKL). Then as of late October 2023, all of the “big three” US carriers launched seasonal flights in the market.

Delta was the first to announce seasonal service between Los Angeles and Auckland, followed by United, followed by American. When United and American matched Delta, Delta responded by making this route year-round. That always seemed like a questionable move, so I’m not surprised to see the latest update.

As spotted by Enilria, Delta’s Los Angeles to Auckland route will once again transition to seasonal. This will happen after the 2024-2025 northern winter schedule. That means Delta will suspend the route as of late March 2025. It remains to be seen if it returns seasonally again in late October 2025, though I imagine it will (the schedule isn’t open that far out).

I can’t help but wonder with what logic Delta decided to extend this service to year-round in the first place. The international market in which the “big three” US carriers are consistently raking in the dough is across the Atlantic in summer. So I was surprised that Delta executives thought an A350 could be better utilized to Auckland than to Europe (never mind that it’s a significantly longer flight).

With this cut, Delta’s year-round long haul international destinations out of Los Angeles include Paris, Sydney, and Tokyo (given that Delta is cutting its London service as of May 2024, and is handing it over to Virgin Atlantic). Then the airline has seasonal flights to Auckland, Brisbane, and Tahiti.

While some have suggested that Delta is trying to take the lead among US carriers with global services out of Los Angeles, that doesn’t seem to be materializing. That’s probably for good reason, since it’s a challenging market with a lot of foreign competition.

Delta won’t fly to Auckland year-round

We’ve seen too much growth across the South Pacific

Recently we’ve seen an absolutely massive expansion across the South Pacific among US airlines. This has primarily come in three areas:

I think we’ve probably peaked when it comes to South Pacific service for US carriers, and we’re going to see reductions, rather than more additions. Sure, there’s a fair bit of seasonal demand across the South Pacific, and US carriers need somewhere to send their wide bodies counter seasonally (since many Europe routes are only in summer).

However, as Cranky Flier recently analyzed, United has really struggled to fill seats across the South Pacific, and the numbers are pretty grim. United’s expansion is coming at the expense of yields.

US carriers have very high operating costs (and that doesn’t even account for upcoming flight attendant pay increases, which are inevitable), and these are very long routes.

I have to imagine we’ll see some peak season reductions to Auckland, the Brisbane flights will mostly only last as long as the subsidies do, and United will scale back its growth.

United’s South Pacific growth won’t last to current levels

Bottom line

Delta no longer plans to fly between Los Angeles and Auckland year-round, as the airline is instead reducing this service to seasonal. That means American, Delta, and United, will all exclusively operate seasonal flights in the market.

I was surprised when Delta decided to make the Auckland route year-round in the first place, so I’m also not surprised to see this reversal.

What do you make of Delta backtracking on its Auckland plans?

Conversations (44)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Tim Dunn Diamond

once again, Cranky Flier showed that DL's Load factor to AKL was 5 points higher than UA even though DL used the largest capacity plane - the ex-Latam A350 - among US airlines on its single daily flight during the winter. UA shot itself in the foot by dumping capacity into the AKL market by trying to keep DL out. DL might be temporarily reducing capacity during the offpeak season but it is keeping the capacity up during the peak period by, once again, using the ex-Latam A350s for the US winter 2024-25 season. The message is clear. If UA or anyone else just wants to throw capacity into the market to try to push DL out, DL will just use its largest, least premium international airplane. UA will learn. They failed miserably dumping capacity onto its TPAC system for winter 2023-24. AA and DL will be in AKL for the long-term. UA can do stupid things and pay the price or it can accept that it really doesn't own any part of the globe and if it tries, it cannot possibly achieve financial results comparable to DL that wants.

0
‼ 0
John Guest

Some kind soul, please do a welfare check on Tim Dunce.

1
‼ 0
AF Guest

UUUGH with the seasonal BS....

0
‼ 0
Weekend Surfer Guest

Hawaiian Airlines also cut their route between HNL and AKL to seasonal. I was originally supposed to go this July, but they axed the summer months. Found a good use of my HA miles for Christmas, though!

0
‼ 0
Ripty Guest

Quite frankly, the amount of supply for flights from Auckland-North America has been insane and isn't sustainable. Even if you added the amount of flights from Sydney and Melbourne to North America (Both cities 4 times bigger in population), it would still be less than the amount of flights out of Auckland to North America. I think the logic most airlines have is that most people wouldn't mind transiting via Auckland to Australia, but you still need to get a NZ Esta to transit AKL and only Air NZ flights have late departures which is great for connecting flights from Australia that arrive in the evening. Most of the time it's more convenient to transit SFO,YVR,DFW,HNL or LAX and fly directly to Syd/Mel from there. Personally would like it to stay that way where Auckland has lots of competition to North America, but I just don't think it's sustainable long term.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published