Delta Adds Los Angeles To Brisbane Flights

A couple of days ago, Delta Air Lines announced plans to launch flights to a second airport in Australia. I wanted to provide an update, as this flight is now on sale, meaning that we have a sense of what the schedule will look like (as that wasn’t revealed when the route was announced).

Delta adds seasonal route to Brisbane as of December 2024

Between December 4, 2024, and March 28, 2025, Delta will offer a new seasonal flight between Los Angeles (LAX) and Brisbane (BNE). The 7,161-mile journey will operate three time weekly, with the following schedule:

DL93 Los Angeles to Brisbane departing 11:10PM arriving 7:45AM (+2 days)
DL92 Brisbane to Los Angeles departing 10:45AM arriving 6:15AM

The westbound flight is blocked at 14hr35min and will operate on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, while the eastbound flight is blocked at 13hr30min and will operate on Sundays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.

The flight will be operated by an Airbus A350-900 (not the ex-LATAM version), featuring 306 seats, comprised of:

  • 32 business class seats, in a 1-2-1 configuration
  • 48 premium economy seats, in a 2-4-2 configuration
  • 36 extra legroom economy seats, in a 3-3-3 configuration
  • 190 economy seats, in a 3-3-3 configuration

As far as Delta’s long haul destinations out of Los Angeles go, this service complements flights to Auckland, London, Paris, Sydney, Tahiti, and Tokyo. Delta’s only other Australia service is to Sydney, where the airline offers daily year-round flights, and this upcoming peak season, the airline plans to offer up to twice daily flights.

Delta will fly the A350 to Brisbane

How this fits into the competitive landscape

Delta really is a follower rather than a leader across the South Pacific, and Delta is the last of the “big three” US carriers to fly to Brisbane:

Now Delta is following the lead of both United and American, though Delta is at a significant competitive disadvantage when it comes to connectivity in Australia:

  • United has a partnership with Virgin Australia, offering substantial connectivity beyond Brisbane
  • American has a joint venture with Qantas, so has tons of connectivity throughout Australia

After being dumped by Virgin Australia, Delta launched a casual interline agreement with Rex, offering some connectivity within Australia. Though I think we can all agree that it’s not as significant of a partnership as what United and American have in the region.

Furthermore, Delta will only fly to Brisbane 3x per week, so the carrier’s schedule can’t compete with the daily flights that other airlines are offering.

So, why are US airlines suddenly flocking to Brisbane? As it turns out, the Queensland government is offering each airline tens of millions of dollars in incentives to operate this service, in a big tourism push. These incentives last for a period of three years, so what will be telling is if these routes last once the incentives run out.

US carriers went from operating no flights to Brisbane a couple of years ago, to now in some cases having up to four daily flights. I just can’t imagine this is sustainable. Admittedly US carriers need somewhere to fly wide body aircraft counter seasonally, but I have a hard time imagining this will be some long term goldmine.

It also seems clear that Delta’s route to Brisbane is being launched due to these incentives, given that the airline chose to launch flights to Brisbane before even flying to Melbourne, which is a much bigger market.

Delta is the last of the “big three” carriers to add Brisbane flights

Bottom line

As of December 2024, Delta will launch a new seasonal three times weekly flight between Los Angeles and Brisbane with an Airbus A350. Delta is the last of the “big three” US carriers to fly to Brisbane, and the airline will also have the most limited schedule, as well as the least connectivity in Australia. However, that doesn’t seem to matter much, as this route is all about subsidies from the Queensland government.

What do you make of Delta adding flights to Brisbane?

Conversations (161)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Tim Dunn Diamond

don't underestimate the messaging that Delta is sending to United about LAX and Asia-Pacific as a whole. There has been oodles of internet ink spilled touting UA's supremacy and DL's supposed weakness but UA faltered on its LAX-BNE route, DL is in rebuilding mode across the Pacific for a number of very good reasons, and DL would love to hold up a route where it jumped in and grew its LAX portfolio at UA's expense. There will be more of these incursions between the two even though DL and UA have largely done its thing and stayed out of each other's way while DL has butted heads with AA

0
‼ 0
C. Weston Guest

Only 1,250,000 delta miles for a one-way business class seat. Yeah!

2
‼ 0
Anthony Diamond

125 replies? Lol

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

Gary over VFTW has a story on the subsidies that US carriers are receiving for their BNE service. The press release from the Queensland government fund notes that DL is getting the largest available subsidy likely because the A350-900 is larger than the B787-9 that AA and UA use and also has the capacity to carry 20 tonnes of cargo, a number that higher take off weight A350-900s can do but some of DL's earlier A350-900s would struggle to do with a full load. It is a given that there will be many days where DL won't fill all of the seats so will have more available cargo capacity and the northbound flight is well within the range of any A350. The primary point is that DL jumped on the subsidy bandwagon - which amounts to up to AUD 750/passenger for the latest AA and DL flights. The press release also says that DL is "forecast" to increase the route to daily in 2025 and beyond. As I have noted, including the ex-Latam A350s that are being reconfigured later this year, DL will have up to 16 A350s in its standard international configuration available by the winter of 2025 on top of 12 additional A330-900s which gives DL by far the most widebody growth capacity of the big 3. And QF is likely the loser as the US carriers use larger airplanes with more premium cabins and more cargo capacity.

0
‼ 0
Brian W Guest

Seems a route the public is not demanding, burning a lot of fuel and pilot hours (costs), and using an incredibly expensive A350. Surprised route planning pushed this

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published