Marriott Loses Up To 122 Hotels In Contract Dispute

Marriott may be losing up to 122 hotels in the coming months, which represents around 1.5% of its global portfolio.

SVC’s threat to pull 122 hotels from Marriott

Marriott doesn’t actually own most of its hotels, but rather they’re owned by investment companies, and then Marriott just has a contract to manage them. Service Properties Trust (SVC) owns 122 Marriott properties in 31 states, with the following breakdown by brand (complete SVC property list):

  • 2 Marriotts
  • 2 SpringHill Suites
  • 12 TownePlace Suites
  • 35 Residence Inns
  • 71 Courtyards

A couple of weeks ago, SVC sent a letter to Marriott requesting Marriott pay $11 million within 10 days, or else it would terminate its management contract with Marriott:

  • The $11 million is supposed to cover the shortfall between the payments SVC has received to date from Marriott, and 80% of the priority returns due to SVC for the eight months ending August 2020
  • These properties require annual minimum returns of $194.6 million, but both the security deposit that SVC previously held to secure minimum return payments, and the $30 million guarantee provided by Marriott, have been fully utilized
  • While the contract between SVC and Marriott was supposed to expire in 2035, SVC could terminate its agreement if it doesn’t get the payment

In other words, Marriott has guaranteed a minimum return to hotel owners, but those guarantees haven’t been met due to the pandemic, and that gives SVC an easy out.

The Marriott Nashville Airport will be rebranded

SVC is following through on its promise

SVC has announced that it’s pulling up to 122 hotels from Marriott by January 31, 2021:

  • 98 of the 122 hotels will be transitioning from Marriott to Sonesta
  • 24 of the 122 hotels will be sold for $153 million (we don’t know what will happen to them under new ownership)
For a further breakdown of that:
  • A portfolio of eight TownePlace Suites properties with 834 rooms in four states will be sold for $45.3 million
  • A portfolio of 16 hotels (13 Courtyard properties and three Residence Inn properties) with 2,155 rooms in nine states will be sold for $107.8 million
  • SVC has been unable to sell nine additional Marriott branded hotels pursuant to its existing agreement, and those hotels will be transitioned to Sonesta by December 15, 2020
  • The remaining Marriott properties will be transitioned to Sonesta by January 31, 2021

The SpringHill Suites Nashville Airport will be rebranded

SVC’s strategy with Sonesta

SVC is taking an interesting strategy with Sonesta. A few weeks back it was announced that 103 IHG hotels owned by SVC would transition to Sonesta for exactly the same reason.

In many ways it almost seems like SVC is looking for opportunities to have more hotels join Sonesta, because SVC owns a 34% stake in Sonesta. In other words, it shares in the benefit of the new management agreement on both ends.

Currently Sonesta has about 80 properties. Then there are another 103 coming from IHG, and now there will be at least 98 coming from Marriott, which means the size of Sonesta could more than triple in a year.

One might assume that there’s no way that these hotels will perform as well with Sonesta as with major brands like IHG or Marriott, but history tells a different story:

  • In 2012, 16 IHG properties were already rebranded as Sonestas, and after conversion the total annual revenue and EBITDA at these hotels improved significantly
  • Then again, this was during a period where the economy was doing great, so only time will tell if the same is true this time around

Sonesta’s hotel portfolio is more than tripling

Bottom line

SVC is terminating its contract with Marriott for 122 hotels — 98 of them will be joining Sonesta, while 24 of them are being sold, so we’ll see what the future holds for them (it could be that these properties maintain Marriott branding).

While we’ve seen individual hotels leave the Marriott portfolio during the pandemic (or some just go out of business flat out), this is the biggest exodus we’ve seen from the brand to date

In a way it’s nice to see another major hotel group emerge, as Sonesta potentially goes from 80 properties to 300+ properties in a year. Sonesta even has a loyalty program that’s fairly rewarding.

Conversations (41)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Otto Rueger Guest

What happens to the Marriott loyalty points accrued by frequent guests?

0
‼ 0
David Guest

Many hotel owners, especially in Asia, are desperately searching for ways to sever ties with Marriott. Marriott doesn't really care about the hotel's bottom line as it doesn't affect them. They are still being paid even if the hotel is operating at a loss.

0
‼ 0
Julia Set Guest

@Ken Go to SPT website ( https://www.svcreit.com/portfolio/portfolio-overview/default.aspx ) then click the link to download a spreadsheet that lists ALL of their properties.

0
‼ 0
KAREN CONLEY Guest

What effect will this have on the employees? I’m furloughed through a the end of December with Courtyard. A co-worker told me we were leaving Marriott in January.

0
‼ 0
Donato Gold

@ Eric Not too bad. These former Marriot properties will retain their pools no matter what they are branded. As for the coffee, Starbucks or not it was usually cold or empty when I got to it. Maybe Marriot should have added to its standards a requirement t refill or replace the coffer every hour or two. It always demonstrates that the real Marriot customer is not us, it is the property owner that needs to be kept happy.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published