Heathrow May Enforce Slot Requirements This Winter

It looks like Heathrow Airport may actually require airlines to use their slots this winter if they want to keep them, which is either really bad or really good, depending on how you look at it.

Heathrow slot restrictions have been relaxed

Many congested airports around the world are slot restricted, which means that airlines need slots in order to operate flights to & from them. Sometimes these slots are awarded on a merit basis, while other times they can be purchased and sold.

In the case of Heathrow it’s a mix of both — the slots have been granted to airlines over the years, though airlines can also sell these for big money. For example, back in 2016, Oman Air paid a record $75 million for a Heathrow slot pair.

The catch is that most slots come with a “use it or lose it clause.” That’s to say that if airlines don’t use their slots at least a certain percentage of the time (typically 80%) then they can lose the slots.

Understandably the pandemic has caused some major issues with that. Global demand for air travel is way down, which would have meant that airlines would have had to fly mostly empty planes to maintain their slots. As a result, Heathrow (and many other airports around the world) have waived slot requirements for the past several months.

In other words, airlines haven’t had to fear using their slots if they don’t operate enough flights.

Heathrow Airport is currently waiving slot requirements

Full restrictions could kick in this winter

Airport Coordination Limited (ACL) manages slot allocations at UK airports, the largest and most slot restricted of which is Heathrow. The organization is making it clear that as of now there’s no plan to waive slot requirements for the winter 2020 season, which kicks in as of late October 2020.

That’s not to say that this couldn’t change, but it’s intended to give airlines all the information currently available as they plan their schedules. As was announced:

“Carriers will need to make their own assessment on the timing and likelihood of a waiver and determine their hand back strategy accordingly.”

Airlines may have to use 80% of their Heathrow slots this winter

I’m conflicted on this…

I think there are two valid sides to this…

What would happen if the waiver wasn’t extended? We would probably see airlines operate “ghost” flights in order to maintain slots, which is a waste in every way, and terrible for the environment. In other words, British Airways may be shuttling planes all day between London Heathrow and London Gatwick in order to maintain its slots, without any passengers.

But then there’s the other side of the coin. If an airline wanted to start flights to Heathrow right now it couldn’t, because slots belong to other airlines, even if they’re not being used.

For example, JetBlue wants to start flying to London next year, but Heathrow probably isn’t in the cards due to lack of slots. Similarly, Wizz Air wants to break up the competition and start flying to Heathrow if there were slots available.

JetBlue wants to start flying to London in 2021

Is it logical to see British Airways holding onto slots it can’t use, while other airlines that want to add service can’t fly there? That doesn’t seem fair either, does it?

The unfortunate reality, though, is that it may be smaller airlines harmed by this, rather than British Airways. British Airways could shift all Gatwick flights to Heathrow, and IAG airlines (including Aer Lingus, Iberia, and Vueling) could increase flights to Heathrow, and British Airways would probably be fine.

The bigger issue would be for foreign airlines operating less frequent flights to London. If there are border restrictions preventing most people from traveling, should they just operate nearly empty flights to Heathrow, or what should be done?

Philippine Airlines currently isn’t using all of its Heathrow slots

Bottom line

As of now UK airports plan to enforce slot requirements this winter, meaning airlines would have to use 80% of their slots or risk losing them.

Personally I think it’s highly likely the slot waiver will be extended, given that the alternative would be airlines operating a bunch of “ghost” flights.

Still, something about the system of allocating slots needs to change. Even though Heathrow is way under capacity at the moment, an airline couldn’t add flights because other airlines are just sitting on their slots without using them.

What do you make of the current Heathrow slot situation?

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

John Guest

There wasn't a consensus between IATA, ACI and WWACG on how to handle W20 and issuance of waivers. Globally, Regulators were on a wait and see approach if the parties could work it out among themselves. They didn't, and now it's up to each regulator to issue guidelines. Until the UK decides how to handle it, ACL has no choice. EU coordinators and airlines took a more collaborative approach with the EU regulators following the recommendations agreed too. US FAA still hasn't issued theirs yet, but this only impacts 4-5 airports anyway in the US. So far you're seeing most Countries giving waivers but with conditions attached.

0
‼ 0
Hime Guest

Why do people keep claiming that demand is down? It isn't. People want to travel. They are not allowed to due to government imposed restrictions (eg closed borders, travel bans, etc). Demand isn't down. Government regulations are up. @Scudder No, the airline owning the slots doesn't have to operate their own aircraft. Qantas owns 4 slot pairs at LHR. Their schedule before the pandemic only used 2. The other 2 are leased to BA.

0
‼ 0
red_robbo Gold

@ Phil Duncan What a vindictive and flawed attitude to have! Two wrongs don't make a right. Whilst I'm by no means a fan of BA's insensitive handling of their staff during the current industry crisis, any further damage done to the airline's operation would only exacerbate the situation and inevitably lead to even more redundancies!

0
‼ 0
Phil Duncan Guest

LHR is my home airport. I would welcome slot restrictions being reimposed in the winter season in the hope that it will damage the BA operation after all the damage BA has done to the local economy over recent months with redundancies and reduced terms of working for many thousands of staff. What goes around comes around and the BA board have bad times coming to them.

0
‼ 0
Martin Guest

I used to work for Qantas a fair few years ago. We used to contract a local charter airline to operate in and out of Heathrow with a BAE146 shuttling to Manchester and back to maintain service in the slots not being used, operating under a special Qantas flight number. Given the current circumstance whereby Qantas couldn’t even fly if it wanted to given it is illegal for Australians to travel out of Australia without approval, there will need to be a waiver or these ghost flights will return.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published