Flight Attendants Getting COVID-19 At Lower Rate Than General Population

It’s now being claimed that flight attendants are getting coronavirus at a lower rate than the general population. While it might seem counterintuitive at first, maybe there’s some merit to it?

Flight attendant coronavirus risk

We’re seeing both airline management and unions claim that flight attendants are getting coronavirus at a lower rate than the general population.

Just this week United Airlines’ CEO, Scott Kirby, said the following:

“At United, but also at our large competitors, our flight attendants have lower COVID infection rates than the general population, which is one of multiple data points that speaks to the safety on board airplanes.”

Then Delta Air Lines’ CEO, Ed Bastian, said the following:

“If the experience of flying was not safe, you’d expect our people to get sick. We track the health of our people. Our people are meaningfully less infected than the general population.”

Here’s the data used to support this claim:

  • There are around 122,000 people in the US employed as flight attendants, and just over 1,000 have tested positive for coronavirus, for a 0.8% incidence
  • There are 330 million people in the US, and there have been 6.6 million coronavirus cases, for a 2% incidence

That suggests flight attendants are getting coronavirus at only around 40% the rate of the general population.

As Sara Nelson, the President of the Association of Flight Attendants, describes these statistics:

“I really want to applaud our airlines and our airports who have really stepped up. I think all of that is evidence that the policies that have been put in place and the practices that have been put in place have helped to really decrease the risk of spreading coronavirus and in a lot of ways really control it in air travel better than on almost any other place in our communities.”

What could this be attributed to?

First of all, I think it’s worth acknowledging that this isn’t a peer-reviewed study. Rather this is the internal data that airlines have on employees.

While there are 122,000 flight attendants in the US, many of them have been flying very limited schedules. While I imagine they’re supposed to report cases to the company, I also wouldn’t be surprised if not all cases were reported correctly, especially in situations where flight attendants didn’t have any flying on their schedule.

I still expect that this data is at least close to being accurate. This is also a good reminder that if you’re scared or cautious about traveling, it’s probably not the flight you should necessarily be concerned about.

When the pandemic started, the thought of getting on a plane sounded terrifying, since people don’t usually put “airplanes” and “great air quality” in the same sentence. But that perception is hopefully starting to change due to a few factors:

  • The HEPA filters that airlines use are really good, and fully circulate air every few minutes; this is better than just about any other indoor space you’ll find yourself in
  • As much as we hear stories suggesting otherwise, airlines do a better job enforcing mask policies than just about any other businesses where proper distancing isn’t possible
  • When you consider that tens of millions of people have flown since the pandemic started, there are very few cases traced to planes
  • Passengers should be most concerned about the risk of everything else when traveling, including airports (particularly security checkpoints, jet bridges, and bathrooms) and what they do at their destination

Based on that you may not be surprised to learn that flight attendants have average cases, but how do they have significantly below average cases? I’d speculate that it probably comes down to mask awareness, even beyond the job:

  • Airline employees have been doing a phenomenal job wearing masks correctly, in my experience, much more so than those in any other line of work
  • Flight attendants understand the importance of masks, and probably take those precautions even when not flying, since they get so used to it

Bottom line

Data shared by airlines and unions suggests that flight attendants are testing positive for coronavirus at a rate that’s less than half of that of the general population. While I wouldn’t assume the data is 100% accurate, I do think it’s generally true.

That further supports that flying with proper precautions is fairly low risk, and it probably also reflects that flight attendants are more likely than others to follow best practices even when not working.

What do you make of this data?

Conversations (44)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

gina Guest

@spaceman spiff The link you provide not only does not give definitive data, but WORSE it describes N95 masks-which I already said are useful; that is not my beef nor is it what I discuss above which you disparage. It is the crappy masks most of us use because that is all we can buy/have. Show me definitive data on how these non N95 masks effectively reduce deaths or real infection? All I have seen are dumb guesstimates or one expert siting another expert. Tragically, experts have been more wrong than right since January. No cold hard science proving these crappy masks almost everyone is wearing saves lives (again, we are not talking N95 or better). None. If you show real data I can be persuaded to change my mind as I am intellectually honest. I should not have to spoon feed you-do your own intellectual due diligence. But I will do so. Click on the hyperlink and look directly at the study. https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/data-do-not-back-cloth-masks-limit-covid-19-experts-say

0
‼ 0
Andy Guest

I agree that comparing two averages (hey, this is not even correlation!) does not prove causation. But the theory is plausible: more strict hygiene procedures than in other industries (including masks, and they way they are worn) combined with HEPA filters which are virtually inexistent in other industries, should do the job.

0
‼ 0
panda Guest

“Adjusted for...” are the key words missing from these analyses. Without adjusting for factors such as number of hours close to other people and for age, the flight attendant analysis is meaningless. As is the mask “analysis” of European countries without adjusting for number of hours close to other people and for mask wearing compliance (not just mask policy).

0
‼ 0
Samo Guest

I love how everytime someone proves masks have a little actual effect, someone else suggests banning the debate on the issue. Come on, if you're so sure about your narrative, you should have no problem to win the debate with good arguments. Problem is that actual numbers from Europe show no correlation between mask-wearing and infection rates. In fact, if you order EU+ states by new cases per capita, all mask-free states are in the bottom 12. Spain and France have extreme masking policies, requiring them even outdoors, and yet they lead the table with 292 and 166 new cases per 100k over the last 14 days. On the other hand, states that don't require masks in any situation are Sweden (21st place out of 32, 30 new cases per 100k), Norway (22nd, 29), Estonia (24th, 26), Iceland (26th, 19), Finland (29th, 11) and Latvia (32nd, 4). Yes, the best-performing EU state is mask-free. And while most of these countries are seeing some increase in new cases, it's much slower than in states with mask mandates.

0
‼ 0
Kirby Guest

Lucky, I know you do not police/censor your comments, and I admire you for that. That said, if there was ever a time to take exception to that policy, it is now. Johan's comment and linking to anti-mask propaganda actively encouraging dangerous and irresponsible behavior that prolongs and worsens this pandemic should not be tolerated on this blog.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published