Dutch Government Buys Stake In Air France-KLM To “Protect Dutch Interests”

Oh my, this is escalating quickly.

It has just been announced that the Dutch government has bought a 12.68% stake in Air France-KLM for 680 million EUR, and they hope to increase that even further. For comparison, France has a 14.3% stake in the company. The Dutch government says that they are doing this to “better safeguard the Dutch public interest.”

So, what exactly is going on?

Ben Smith was appointed CEO of Air France-KLM late last year, and he has been working on getting the different business units to work more closely together. This has included Air France and KLM cooperating more closely, which has been met with resistance from KLM.

The reality is that while Air France-KLM (the parent company) is looking out for the interests of both airlines, historically a lot more focus has been on Air France. The company has always been headquartered in Paris, and up until their most recent CEO, has always had a French CEO.

Smith has been trying to get Air France and KLM to cooperate more closely. On the surface this makes sense to me, since surely there are a lot of synergies they’re missing out on. At the same time, KLM is performing well, while Air France historically hasn’t done as well (largely due to labor issues). KLM and the Dutch are worried about what closer cooperation would mean for the airline.

There had been rumors that KLM’s CEO, Pieter Elbers, wasn’t onboard with Smith’s vision for the company. This became a big issues in the Netherlands, and the government even wrote a letter of support saying it was important he stay on. It was recently announced that Elbers will be staying on, but it seems like there’s still some bad blood.

For example, this photo op between Smith and Elbers is causing many to wonder just how much bad blood there is. They’re asked three times to shake hands, but don’t do so (it’s also possible they didn’t hear it, but…).

Now the Dutch government has taken this “war” to the next level, by taking a bigger stake in the company, and they’re viewing this as protecting the interests of the country.

Bottom line

This is going to be a very interesting situation to watch unfold over the coming weeks.

Smith is a bright guy, and I think he’s on the right track with wanting closer cooperation between the two airlines. However, he probably wasn’t quite anticipating the extent to which this would become a national issue.

At this point we have the Dutch government stepping in and trying to change the course of the airline at the cost of hundreds of millions of Euros. They’re more than welcome to do that, of course, but this will make things even more challenging.

Wow…

(Tip of the hat to @thomas199023)

Conversations (37)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Callum Guest

While I don't disagree with the arguments, the evidence you're all using is suspect. Continually stating that KLM currently make more profit isn't really relevant to their goal. Air France has a bigger potential profit, and companies look to the future - not always the past.

0
‼ 0
Frog Guest

The Dutch governments responsibility is to the Dutch people and not to make Ben Smith's life easy. It's clear that Ben sees KLM and the Dutch market as a lower prioriry and clearly seems to have a poor understanding of the situation.

0
‼ 0
vlcnc Guest

Totally agree with majik above. Also Chandan Bhat makes some great points too. In my view KLM would be better off without AF - AF is a basket case and it is laughable he is trying to make it a "premium carrier". Neither are industry leaders, but KLM at least has fantastic staff, a great hub and a good consistent product particularly in short-haul. I also understand Ben/Lucky admires Ben Smith, but do think this isn't nearly critical enough at the same time he is human and AF is frankly a nightmare - but I do think he is completely failed from the get go of uniting these two carriers and has actually alienated the only part of his business that makes money and is successful. Frankly I think AF/KLM as an entity is not rescuable - I don't think you could find a more ill matched pair of airlines culturally. Demerger would be the best outcome. I actually miss the days when KLM tried to be a global carrier like we see with Turkish, Emirates or Qatar and I do think they out of all the Western European carriers are the one that have the best shot at this if they ever do return to this goal...

0
‼ 0
Kerry Diamond

I have to join the other commenters here and question just why this article is still talking about what a “smart guy” Ben Smith is and what wonderful things he is doing/trying to do for AF-KLM.... we don’t have enough information to evaluate that at all yet, and we certainly don’t know what his intentions are eg saying he is just “wanting closer cooperation between the airlines”. From the limited evidence so far since he has been in charge, he has managed to increase the labour costs at AF quite substantially, while utterly alienating the management and employees of the Dutch side of the corporation, which has been carrying the group financially for years. This does not scream “success” to me, although as I have said it’s too early to make final judgements. In addition, this statement that Smith “probably wasn’t quite anticipating the extent to which this would become a national issue” is frankly a bit absurd; the man was brought in to take over the holding corporation of two national carriers. If he was unaware that “robbing Peter to pay Paul” in this situation would create a problematic political issue with one side then he was not fit to take the job. I enjoy your coverage of this interesting topic Lucky but please try and make it a bit more balanced.

0
‼ 0
Mike Diamond

It’s time for Delta to pony up some serious cash to take a major stake in KLM. Northwest/KLM were seriously joined at the hip before the NW/DL merger and that partnership reaped huge benefits for both carriers. AF will never be as important to Skyteam as KLM. AF doesn’t have the hub, the management, or frankly the will of the employees to pull it off. They are too focused on being “French” at the expense of running the business. Yes, KL is very “Dutch” but unlike AF they are also pragmatists. Something the French are not. There are many former NW upper management people now at DL who remember well the synergies created by the NW/KL partnership. It’s time for DL to take another look at that and protect what they have.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published