British Airways Mixed Fleet: What Is It?

Most airlines have some quirks when it comes to their workforce and labor contracts, though British Airways’ cabin crew situation is among the most interesting to me.

Whenever I review airlines I talk about the service, and in the case of British Airways flights I always reference whether the crew is “mixed fleet” or not.

I just took another British Airways flight and was writing up the review, and realized that I’ve never written a full explanation of what exactly mixed fleet cabin crew are, and why you should (or shouldn’t care). So that’s what this post is intended to address.

What makes a British Airways flight attendant “mixed fleet,” and what’s the difference anyway?

British Airways’ 2010 Labor Dispute

Historically British Airways cabin crew were extremely well compensated. For the Heathrow base, there were two types of crews:

  • “Worldwide fleet” crews, which operated their long haul flights
  • “Euro fleet” crews, which operated their short haul flights

This is an interesting distinction to begin with, since at most airlines flight attendants can work all kinds of different flights, but that wasn’t the case at British Airways.

I’m getting sidetracked here, because that distinction has little to do with mixed fleet.

In 2010 British Airways management and their flight attendants had a huge labor dispute. British Airways was facing increased competition from ultra low cost carriers, and they needed to cut costs.

They were looking for concessions from cabin crew, though the two sides couldn’t come to an agreement. Cabin crew ended up collectively striking for more than three weeks, which had huge impacts on British Airways’ operations.

That’s How Mixed Fleet Was Born…

Given that management and the union weren’t able to come to an agreement, the company took drastic measures. British Airways said that they’d never hire another flight attendant under their existing contracts, and that they’d instead create a whole new cabin crew workforce, known as mixed fleet.

Mixed fleet cabin crew are paid significantly less, have different work rules, in some cases stay at worse hotels on layovers, etc. With the creation of the new program, British Airways was able to hire flight attendants at a much lower cost than they could have ever gotten from their other crews.

How Can You Tell If You Have A Mixed Fleet Crew?

Mixed fleet and worldwide fleet crews don’t fly together — they operate separate flights, and obviously they’re opposing work groups in a way, since worldwide fleet flight attendants probably think that the mixed fleet flight attendants are “stealing” their jobs (though I think their beef is more with management than the mixed fleet crews as such).

So, how can you tell if the crew is mixed fleet? Just look at them:

  • No flight attendants on the worldwide fleet contract have been hired since 2010, so none of them are under 30; in reality most of them are in their 40s, 50s, and 60s
  • Mixed fleet cabin crew come in all ages, and can be hired starting at the age of 18; there are some older mixed fleet flight attendants who choose that as a second career, though in reality I’ve found the average age of a mixed fleet crew to be mid 20s at most

I’m not trying to be ageist, but truly that’s the most obvious way to tell, because the age difference is very evident.

Another way to tell is based on the announcement from the cabin leader. On flights with worldwide fleet crews, the leading flight attendant is referred to as the “cabin service director,” while for mixed fleet crews they’re referred to as the “customer service manager.”

Then a third way involves hats, and this is especially ridiculous if you ask me:

  • Female mixed fleet crew wear hats on all flights
  • Female worldwide fleet crew wear hats only on A350s, A380s, and 787s (yeah, what the heck?)

Just to give a sense of how young mixed fleet cabin crew can be, I once had a customer service manager on a 747 who was 22 (and looked significantly younger than that, which is the only reason the age came up). Yes, that’s right, a 22 year old was managing the cabin. Good for him.

What Are The Practical Implications?

Above I shared how you can tell if you have a mixed fleet crew, but what are the real implications? In general you’ll find there’s a huge difference in terms of the service style of worldwide fleet vs. mixed fleet crews.

The worldwide fleet crews are all experienced and have been in their routine for a long time, for better or worse:

  • Some are extremely professional and polished, among the best flight attendants out there
  • Some have really bad attitudes, are arrogant, and don’t seem to enjoy their jobs

I find worldwide fleet crews to be a mixed bag, though one thing is for sure — they know what they’re doing.

Conversely I find mixed fleet crews to generally be incredibly well intentioned, enthusiastic, and friendly, but the service flow sometimes feels like a training program. Turnover is incredibly high for mixed fleet crews given how little they’re paid, and as you’d expect there’s no substitute for experience.

In general my preference would be an excellent worldwide fleet crew, followed by a mixed fleet crew, followed by a grumpy worldwide crew. 😉

Mixed Fleet Controversy

There’s quite a bit of controversy surrounding mixed fleet cabin crew, and there have been claims that they’re getting paid “poverty wages.”

On their careers page, British Airways claims that mixed fleet cabin crew get a starting salary of £15,612 (~20,500USD) per year, and have “the potential to earn, on average, a rewards package of between £23,000 and £28,000” per year.

Being based in London, that’s not exactly amazing pay to begin with, though there are also arguments that those amounts are inflated to begin with, and actual pay for many cabin crew is even lower.

This is why turnover is so high, since people can’t afford to keep the job. It is a “glamorous” job in the sense that you get to travel all over the world from the very beginning and can be promoted quickly, but given the pay, not many people stick around.

Bottom Line

There are lots of airlines with interesting quirks when it comes to their flight attendant staffing.

In many cases we see airlines have foreign bases to save costs, like American’s Bogota-based crews, Finnair’s Singapore-based crews, and Cathay Pacific’s San Francisco based crews. In the case of British Airways all the flight attendants they’ve hired in the past decade (or so) have been on a much less expensive contract.

Anyway, since I always reference the “type” of crew I have in my reviews of British Airways flights, I figured it was time to expand a bit on the differences.

Hopefully this explains why you may take two back-to-back British Airways long haul flights where one crew is an average of 55 years old, and the other crew is an average of 25 years old.

Which type of crew is better depends on whether you prefer a polished and experienced crew, or an enthusiastic but potentially unpolished crew.

What has your experience been like with British Airways mixed fleet crews?

Conversations (43)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Garh Guest

@the nice Paul, as crew I have to say that a large majority of my flying colleagues are definitely not living in London. On Mixed fleet it is usually because they don’t enjoy it in London or because they can’t afford to live in London. Commuting from Glasgow costs around 300 a month plus maybe 100 if you have to use a hotel for 3 nights in the month. So 400 max, whereas a room in London is about 600 plus, plus travel so 700 minimum. You can get a room in Glasgow for 150-200 so It makes complete sense. Most crew who do this live with their parents or partners too thereby at least halving all their bills. I’m Not disagreeing that LHR is in London though. It is! Lots of the staff you see on the tube are check in staff and other ground staff too and legacy fleets also. Don’t get me wrong, there are mixed fleet crew living in London, but they are few and far between to find them. I myself use the tube after my trains and other tube and I do not live in London either. But MOST CREW BY FAR commute from outside London by air of by car which saves them a fortune.

0
‼ 0
The nice Paul Diamond

@Ned What are you talking about? LHR and LCY are both in London — Heathrow is in the London Borough (sic) of Hillingdon; City is in the London Borough (sic) of Newham. Both are in the Greater London area under the GLA and London Mayor. But you are right that LGW is outside London. Judging by the vast numbers of people wearing BA uniforms on the Tube, huge numbers of LHR-based staff live on the central London side of the airport. When my local station was Earl’s Court, there would always be BA staff there heading out to LHR on the Piccadilly line. Special staff fares operate on what was London Connect, from LHR to the suburbs on the central London side of the airport. Presumably they offer staff fares because, er, staff use that line to commute? Commuting from outside London to LHR is much more difficult by public transport. Maybe rich pilots might do it by car, but there are few obvious routes.

0
‼ 0
Ned Guest

2 small points, one of which has been alluded to 1 - you can’t really make comparisons of spending power when looking at salary differences between countries so difficult for them to mean anything on a US based blog 2 - London house prices change within a few hundred yards. LHR and LGW aren’t in London. LCY is on the outskirts. It would not be advantageous for a commute to any of them to live ‘in London’. I thought it was a shame to ruin a decent piece about an interesting approach to employee relations with the poverty chat and trying to make out of context claims about underpaying

0
‼ 0
ADS Guest

the list of WW & EF vs MF routes is kept reasonably up to date on FT https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/british-airways-executive-club/1600711-mixed-fleet-vs-non-mixed-fleet-routes.html

0
‼ 0
Saira Guest

Dear Ben, your infos are quite precise except that WW went on strike because they wanted to stop the birth of MF (I was still working for BA at the time) . I also would like to clarify a few risk element of the job of cabin crew/pilots that seems to go unnoticed by the majority of the public; health risk factors: lack of sleep, jet lag,night shift,working long hours defying gravity at high altitude (which doubles your working hours), poor quality of food mostly salty,highly salted processed food as at high altitude food losses 30% of its flavour; solar and cosmic radiations that pilots and crew absorb especially on the long haul routes(that lead to tumors)...and the list goes on... also (not you) someone mentioned that it is not a skilled job; how wrong to state something like that! Crew are trained to save lives through very intensive yearly training; their knowledge ranges from the use of the defibrillator,CPR ,administering medications, fire-fighting capabilities (yes,they are the ones that will put down a fire on board!),evacuations techniques in case of danger.... and yes,also serving foods to passenger and sorting out problems at 10.000feet.... it is a skilled job and it should be paid accordingly! The old contracts were paid up to 1996,after that all salaries had a massive drop of thousand and thousand of pounds! BA is always been a money making machine and managers and CEO's have been paid millions with bonuses of 000,000 that will never be made public! The only thing is that if a plane crashes the ones that go down is the crew and pilots and pax of course (and pax are paid millions by insurance companies,where a cabin crew family member will only get less than 60,000£)....anyone whom performs high risk jobs like policeman,firefighters,nurses,crews and nuclear power plants workers etc. should all be paid fairly! Contracts paid after 1996 were adequate to the job qualifications and skills and also most of the crew speak several international languages in order to aid and respond adequately to customer needs! It is silly and ignorant to state that a cabin crew job is unskilled! I left some time ago and feel sorry for the treatment of MF crews by BA's managers greed.... cause that's what it is,just management and sharers greed.... MF is totally underpaid for their performances and the majority of them cannot afford to rent a room; they stay in the job for a year or so which is not good for the company future business; as well as loyal customer,BA should invest on loyal staff; ergo your sometimes "grumpy" crews whom feels left down and haunted by their managers with fear of losing their jobs! Maybe they were declined their Christmas leave for the fourth year in a row to spend it with their children...or someone in the family just died and they cannot make it back in time for the funeral...a delay could make you miss the birth of your first child....just some examples of what certain jobs can take away from you and your life,but someone must do it otherwise many of us will never fly whether is for holidays or work... you will never know!

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published