British Airways’ Disgraceful Offer To Senior Flight Attendants

Obviously this is an incredibly challenging time in the airline industry, though I can’t help but feel like British Airways is being especially ruthless with their flight attendants, and almost taking advantage of the situation… which unfortunately doesn’t come as much of a surprise, given how bad their labor relations have historically been.

I wrote in the past about British Airways’ plan to simplify their cabin crew structure, and we now have a better sense of what that will look like. For many employees this will translate into a permanent 50%+ pay cut…

British Airways’ three Heathrow flight attendant contracts

At major US airlines, all flight attendants work under a single contract. With few exceptions, any flight attendant can work any flight, and the pay scale is the same for all flight attendants. That’s not the case at British Airways.

At Heathrow Airport alone, British Airways has three flight attendant contracts (and this doesn’t even account for their separate Gatwick contracts):

  • Worldwide Fleet — the higher paid flight attendants operating long haul flights
  • Euro Fleet — the higher paid flight attendants operating short haul flights
  • Mixed Fleet — the lower paid flight attendants operating both short and long haul flights; their salaries have often been referred to as “poverty pay”

I’ve written all about British Airways’ Mixed Fleet in the past:

  • British Airways had major labor issues back in 2010
  • The airline wanted concessions from flight attendants and they refused, and ended up going on strike for several weeks
  • At that point the company formed Mixed Fleet, a new employment contract under which all flight attendants would be hired going forward; these crews are paid significantly less, and generally Mixed Fleet has really high turnover due to poor pay
  • A particular flight is either staffed completely with Mixed Fleet, Euro Fleet, or Worldwide Fleet; the contracts don’t allow the crews to mix

British Airways’ proposal to flight attendants

A friend has forwarded me the proposal that British Airways has presented to flight attendants, which will see the structure simplified significantly. With this, there will no longer be three flight attendant contracts, but rather a single contract:

  • All Heathrow based flight attendants would work long haul and short haul flights, and would work flights to all destinations
  • With a single contract there would no longer be a separate Mixed Fleet crew
  • Crew would all be trained on the A320, 777, and 787, as well being trained on one of the following: A350, A380, and 747
  • There would only be two roles on every flight — manager (in charge of the whole plane) and cabin crew (everyone else); previously the Worldwide Fleet had Cabin Service Director (in charge of the whole plane), Customer Service Leader (in charge of a specific cabin), and cabin crew (everyone else)
  • The airline plans on laying off about 12,000 total employees, and there are a total of 971 manager roles and 9,581 cabin crew roles available

As such the above isn’t unreasonable, and in many ways the structure seems significantly more streamlined, which is probably smart. The big catch is the massive pay cuts that Euro Fleet and Worldwide Fleet employees will be taking:

  • Pay for cabin crew will be around £24K per year, including basic pay, flight pay, and per-diems for layovers; they can still earn commission from inflight sales and cabin crew performance incentives
  • Pay for managers will be around £32K per year, including basic pay, flight pay, and per-diems for layovers; they can still earn commission from inflight sales and cabin crew performance incentives

It’s worth noting that the above amounts are really inflated, especially since they’re including per diems. The reality is that laying over in many cities can be expensive, so much of that money will just go towards covering expenses while on the job.

I feel bad for senior British Airways cabin crew

I understand these are tough times in the industry, and that both job cuts and even temporary pay cuts are needed. The problem is that when times are good employees don’t get to see much of the upside of that, while when times are bad they suffer disproportionately.

It just seems cruel to permanently cut the pay for so many longtime employees in this way. We’re not just talking about minor pay cuts.

Rather many former Worldwide Fleet cabin crew and CSDs will be faced with 50%+ pay cuts if they want to stay at the airline.

To me there’s a fine line between asking someone to make a temporary sacrifice and permanently destroying their livelihood in this way. You know British Airways won’t do anything to improve contracts when industry conditions improve, so this just makes me sad.

Bottom line

While it makes sense for British Airways to streamline their flight attendant contracts, I find the way they’re handling this to be disgusting, frankly. To permanently cut pay for their flight attendants who have been at the airline for 10+ years by 50%+ in some cases is just awful.

This isn’t how you treat people, and I’m not sure what they’re expecting from employee morale long-term with policies like this. I guess what they’re really trying to do is to get the senior flight attendants to quit, and just have a revolving door of flight attendants lured by the lifestyle while being paid very little.

Conversations (155)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

BAbetrayalboy Guest

I've been in BA for 35 years and have a Hotel Management degree. When I joined in 1985 the chance of a job was 1,000:1 these days they take youngsters with very little qualifications or experience. Still the training isn't easy to get through and you have annual exams every year. We aren't there just for the service, we are there to evacuate people in emergencies and save people if they need CPR. Please respect our profession, if I keep my job I might be the man with the smile serving you

0
‼ 0
@JetJ0ck Guest

@Matthew Boyle You’re oversimplifying the requirements to be a flight attendant in the United States. If you look at airline requirements they say at least a high school diploma but that doesn’t mean that’s who get chosen. Applicants must compete for the small number of flight attendant positions and airlines prefer degrees. They don’t say it but they also look for applicants who have careers such as registered nurses and police officers, combined with degrees. I’ve flown with soldiers, lawyers, professors and doctors who are flight attendants. The high school diploma requirement is the minimum but not the standard. Then there’s training and probation. It’s harder than college. I know. I’ve done both. As far as everyone else who insulted flight attendants in their comments, there is a lot of ignorance going around on here. @Luke has been the most correct of any of the commenters.

0
‼ 0
Carol Guest

I as most normal working people will fly with whoever's cheapest. I actually prefer flying Virgin who has cheaper flights, newer planes, with the best customer service. They also don’t look down their noses at those in economy!

0
‼ 0
red_robbo Gold

@ Bombay Welshman... Hmmmmm…. Your scaremongering and detailed knowledge of the role makes you sound more like a disgruntled crew member than a commercial passenger.....

0
‼ 0
Bombay Welshman Guest

Some uneducated arguments put forward here. The lack of empathy is surprising. Before talking T&Cs or contracts of employment which are going to be torn up consider how you feel when you have been away and suffered from time change and sleep loss when arriving at a destination. BA crew will now be expected to fly LHR to NRT with minimum turn around and back to the UK for a double CDG or EDI the next day, then off to Australia on a five day trip! No home life and finding accommodation during LHR turnaround. Crews currently living abroad and commuting will not be able to travel (the staff travel concession is likely to be withdrawn) unless full fare, those who live near LHR May be OK but those on short haul will have to find nannies etc for kids when they embark on long haul trips. The main issue is safety; all crew sign in for duty saying they are fit and well rested. Any safety related incident/accident that is the first question asked plus details of previous weeks flying duties. Next safety issue is who is the senior c/crew member on the day. Chain of command is Capt, FO, Senior crew member...that could be someone with 6 months total experience! Any medical, fire, death or birth plus any emergency evacuation being handled by a 20 year old with limited flight experience. Flight deck incapacitation; who goes onto the flight deck to read the check list for pilot in command? Foreign language speakers and ex University attendees all currently help pax have a safe flight. A lack of knowledge via lack of experience and youth are not a combination that I look forward to when I next fly.....and it will not be with BA !

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published