Alaska Mileage Plan Redesigns Their Award Charts

Filed Under: Alaska, Awards

To start I should say that these are only cosmetic changes, so you have nothing to worry about (at least as of now — Alaska promised to try and give at least 30 days notice of any future changes).

Despite Alaska’s recent stealth devaluation of Emirates first class awards, I still consider Mileage Plan miles to be among the most valuable out there. Alaska has some unique airline partners, is great for Cathay Pacific first class redemptions, and they also allow stopovers on one-way awards, making them one of the few programs where that’s allowed.

Cathay-Pacific-The-Pier-Lounge - 13
Cathay Pacific’s The Pier First Class Lounge Hong Kong

That being said, their award program can be a bit complicated. While many airlines have a single award chart valid for travel on all partner airlines, Alaska Mileage Plan has separate award charts for each airline in each region.

Furthermore, you can’t redeem miles for all airlines in all regions, but rather only in regions where a chart is published. For example, Alaska doesn’t publish an award chart for travel on Emirates to Australia, for travel on Air France between Europe and Asia, etc.

While I had no trouble figuring out the Mileage Plan system, I suspect it was a bit more confusing to the average member. In order to simplify the program, Alaska has just redesigned their Mileage Plan award page, and it’s definitely more aesthetically pleasing.

Now when you click on the “Use Miles” tab, you’ll be brought to a page which explains award redemptions on Alaska, and also has a button which reads “Award Charts,” if you want to learn about redemption rates on partner airlines.


There you’ll be able to select the regions you’re traveling to and from. The good news is that this new chart makes it easy to figure out whether or not redemptions are allowed in certain markets.


Once you select the regions, you’ll be brought to a page which lists all the partner airline award charts which are valid in the region pair. The charts are still organized by airline, given that each airline has their own redemption rates.


While the airlines are organized alphabetically, the order in which they list prices within each airline is ridiculous. Who decided the correct order for pricing is business, then economy, then first class, then premium economy?


Then at the bottom of each page are the terms & conditions for awards in general, and those specific to that region. For example, when searching space between the US and Asia it lists the Korean Air blackout dates which apply.


It’s worth noting that once you click the “Book Now” button, the actual search page looks exactly as before.


Bottom line

I’ve always found the partner airline award charts on Alaska’s site rather tough to find, so this does seem like a more straightforward and aesthetically pleasing design. While I had no trouble figuring out the difference between the various old charts, I imagine this is significantly easier for the average traveler who isn’t as knowledgeable about Mileage Plan.

What do you make of the new Mileage Plan award chart design?

(Tip of the hat to Travel Codex)

  1. must be a tech geek web engineer who defaulted the pricing order to cabin characters in an alphabetical order…

  2. There are some errors in the chart. When you try Air France / KLM from Europe to Europe, it shows a round-trip coach ticket as 65,000 miles. It shows a one-way ticket for 15,000 miles in coach, 25,000 in business, and 50,000 round trip in business.

  3. I wondered whether is it a mistake or otherwise. Flying Cathay Pacific F class within Asia to Asia used to be 50K miles for one way. Now it’s 70K miles.

    It doesn’t makes sense since it’s the same mileage required for one way US-Asia too.

  4. Lots of errors, and will make it tougher to find out if they make ‘quiet’ changes to award charts, and a lot of clicking around to discover what region to region combinations are possible which I doubt they have listed comprehensively given the other errors. The footnotes aren’t assigned to the relevant carriers (unless they intend blackout dates for all carriers to Asia), they don’t have off-peak dates for AA in the Asia charts, there are multiple price errors in different regions and carriers.

    Scott’s coming across as an extension of the AS pr dept over the last year or so, I regret to say. I liked AS’ approach a lot before 2016, but recent developments (surcharges on new partners’ awards, no-notice EK deval, Aeromexico awards still missing, likely near term DL departure, likely future devals given the VX overpay and renegotiations with other obvious shall-not-be-named premium carriers coming up) have shifted me to immediate burn mode, with no more preference given to AS or partners versus the Big 3 and other large foreign programs. Seems counter to their constant refrain of using their FF program as a differentiator; they are very close to becoming the same as the Big 3. I won’t state the obvious last domino that would complete the move to the dark side.

  5. Hmm… Indeed, if there are no charts like before, it will make it more complicated to figure out sweet spots and other glance-able info. This should be in addition to what they had previously.

  6. Lucky,
    I think you need to write another piece about how many of these awards have changed with the update of this page. Cathay Pacific now requires the same amount of miles for an intra-asia flight that it does from Asia to the states in Business and First. Either a massive error on their part or they are trying to pull a fast one, with significant changes, on everyone with the update to the page.

  7. Can’t combine partners but does code share count as an Alaska flight?

    EG: PHX-LAX on AA but Alaska code share then Cathay over the Pacific.


Leave a Reply

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *