US Airline Executives Take New Tone On Government Aid

Much of the travel industry has been asking for government aid, given the unprecedented situation we’re in. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding US airlines requesting government aid, given that they’ve used much of their profits over the past many years on stock buy backs, rather than saving up for a rainy day.

US airline executives’ latest letter to Congress

Today a letter has been sent to Congress signed by most major US airline CEOs — they’re taking a different tone with their message, but also painting a very grim picture of the future if they don’t get any assistance.

This letter is signed by the CEOs of most major US airlines, including Alaska, American, Delta, Hawaiian, JetBlue, Southwest, and United. It’s also signed by the CEOs of Atlas Air, FedEx, and UPS, as well as the CEO of Airlines for America.

Here’s the letter, in its entirety:

Dear Leader McConnell, Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi and Leader McCarthy:

On behalf of 750,000 airline professionals and our nation’s airlines, we respectfully request Congress to continue to move expeditiously to pass a bipartisan proposal that includes a combination of worker payroll protection grants, loans and loan guarantees and tax measures.

Time is running out. The worker payroll protection grants are critical to saving the jobs of our employees. Over the past week we have communicated to our employees the dire situation we are in and the potential impacts on them if our government doesn’t step up to help.

We are doing our part. Over the past decade we have reinvested over 73 percent of our operating profits back into our people and product, creating good paying jobs at a rate that has outpaced other sectors. As a result of a global pandemic and government actions to contain it, we are now undertaking over $30 billion of self-help measures, including asking our employees to take voluntary unpaid time off, parking planes and trying to obtain financing in today’s credit market. Those markets are closing up. Given the extreme nature of this situation, we respectfully urge Congress not to pursue opportunistic measures that will hurt, not help our ability to recover. Unless worker payroll protection grants are passed immediately, many of us will be forced to take draconian measures such as furloughs.

If Congress is able to reach a bipartisan agreement on these three critical elements, airlines are committed to ensuring that:

  • If worker payroll protection grants are enacted, equaling at least $29 billion, participating passenger and cargo air carriers will not furlough employees or conduct reductions in force through August 31, 2020.
  • If loans and/or loan guarantees are enacted, equaling at least $29 billion, participating passenger and cargo air carriers commit to:
    • Placing limits on executive compensation;
    • Eliminating stock buy backs over the life of the loans; and
    • Eliminating stock dividends for the life of the loans.

The breadth and immediacy of the need to act cannot be overstated. It is urgent and unprecedented.

We are united as an industry and speaking with one voice. We urge you to swiftly pass a bipartisan bill with worker payroll protections to ensure that we can save the jobs of out 750,000 airline professionals who are coming to work every day to serve the traveling and shipping public.

Key takeaways from this letter

I have two key takeaways here.

First of all, this paints a really grim picture of the current situation. That’s not a surprise (at all), but they’re making it very clear that without government help, airline workers are about to get furloughed.

My second key takeaway is that airline executives are finally starting to have a better narrative here. Up until now their “ask” has come across as out of touch, given the actions of the airline industry in the past few years.

But I think they’re taking exactly the right approach now:

  • They’re being very specific in wanting worker payroll protection grants, loans, loan guarantees, and tax measures; they’re putting frontline workers first here, and that’s important
  • With at least $29 billion in payroll protection grants, the industry is promising not to furlough any employees through at least the end of August 2020
  • With at least $29 billion in loans or loan guarantees, the industry is promising to place a limit on executive compensation, and is promising to eliminate stock buy backs and stock dividends over the life of the loans

I’d be curious about what kind of limits they intend to impose on executive compensation. I’m also intrigued by the concept of promising no furloughs. I largely support that, though the reality is that aviation is more or less coming to a standstill, so will they just pay most employees in full while largely not working at all, or…?

Bottom line

While there are many things I find frustrating about how the US airline industry is run, that’s largely just reflective of corporate America. I think the above letter is perfectly written, and the airlines have come a long way in how they’re presenting their case.

They’re making this about airline workers and are promising limits of share buybacks and executive compensation, which has been a concern for many.

What do you make of this “ask” from US airline executives?

Conversations (73)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Francis Bagbey Guest

My waiter at a local restaurant, a young guy, is Romanian. Came here because he believed America offered him greater opportunity than Romania with its 57th place ranking in GDP per person. So, yes, we have a lot of problems, but I'll buy into your rant about the failings of my country only after I learn no Romanian wants to immigrate to the United States.

0
‼ 0
[email protected] Guest

Hy, I am from Romania. Looking to this corporate America for years and cant believe it. As long as Wall Street dictates everything in your country, including politics, don't be upset for this new bullshit that came. You are talking about billions of dollars but a large part of US population doesn't afford an emergency health service. You pay thousands and tens of thousand dollars for a simple natural birth, expensive health insurance included, in some states, where in Europe is free or insignificant. Just be thankful that only airlines asked that kind of money for bailout. Maybe others wanted but didn't have the political power to ask. Just like 2008. All businesses must be the same. Even a small corner store have problems during this period but don't ask for bailout. All big corporate businesses put upfront the fact that they have a lot of employees with families and they are feeling pitiful for them. Again bullshit. They only feel pitiful for their own profits. Let the ordinary american guy to break his neck working, maybe dying and we will wipe our tears. Why the political power don't put conditions fot the bailout? Even get a part of actives of those airlines? No... Because this is the American dream. Im simply disgusted. Stay safe, all of you. All the best!

0
‼ 0
UA-NYC Diamond

@Cait - Arne will get plenty of compensation for 2020 (stock grants, options, etc.), just not a salary (which is only ~5-10% of a typical CEO compensation package). Don't think he is "doing this for free"...

0
‼ 0
Clifton Guest

No. Simply no. Treat them like any other industry. NO BAILOUT. Let them close so new companies can arise. Companies that won't nickel and dime customers to death, abuse customers, provide sub standard service but "the only service available because we can get away with it".

0
‼ 0
Dr. Seth Guest

So we live in a capitalist society so long as it suites the few and not the many? How the hell does that work? While in college I worked for an airline that is no more as it was merged in the great Hindenburg of CO/UA. I have ZERO pity for the industry that takes and takes and gives nothing back. Apparently, people forgot what the hell really went down with the banks in 2008. The fed dolled out the cash, the banks where suppose to make loans simple enough. News flash not only did the banks not make loans they screwed many customers over even more. Rushed on the repayment of the loans so the clowns at the top could get back to business as usual. The US airline business is full of ass clowns. Executives who make way too much in salary and stock packages. I have no empathy for anyone in a management capacity as they did this one all too themselves. Also who remembers 9/11. By Good ole Bush tossing the payouts from the victim's compensation fund, you could not bring litigation against the airline directly. Why is it in a country that seems to love its capitalism when it suits, we sure as hell act like a socialist society when the preferable shit hits the fan? Loans for small and medium-sized companies only is where I want my hard-earned tax dollars going right now.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published