Airlines Will Have To Repay More Government Aid Than Expected

I’m not sure where exactly this falls on the spectrum of “fair enough, I guess that’s not what they were promised” to “talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth.”

Airlines will have to repay some payroll aid

The US government is providing US airlines with a total of $50 billion in aid, as part of the CARES Act.

About half of that was supposed to come in the form of loans, and the other half was supposed to come in the form of grants to cover payroll for employees in the industry.

Well, on Friday US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told airlines that he wants them to repay some of the $25 billion in payroll grants. The suggestion is that for airlines getting more than $100 million in assistance, 30% of the payroll grants would have to be repaid in the form of low-interest loans.

In other words, of that $25 billion in payroll aid, $17.5 billion would be grants, and the other $7.5 billion would be loans.

Airlines would offer warrants, with the interest rates rising over time if repayment doesn’t occur.  The warrants (which would allow the government to buy stocks at a pre-set price and time) would be equal to 10% of the loan amount.

The industry isn’t happy about this

There’s a lot of frustration in the industry with this revelation. Not surprisingly, airline executives aren’t happy, with one airline executive saying “this is not what Congress approved, the aid was supposed to be $25 billion in cash grants and $25 billion in loans.”

Fair enough, because on some level it does seem like a bait-and-switch, and I can see where the frustration is coming from.

Perhaps what’s more interesting is the anger among airline unions, as they’re making some pretty drastic claims based on this development.

Sara Nelson, the President of the AFA-CWA (a flight attendant union representing many airlines), has claimed that “this will lead to airline bankruptcies,” and that “the Treasury Department is destabilizing the industry, not helping save it.”

Meanwhile a representative for ALPA (a pilot union) said that the organization “is very concerned that the US Treasury is threatening the jobs of pilots and other aviation workers by treating grants for airlines like loans,” also saying “this will hurt workers now and in the future, and slow the recovery the CARES Act was meant to facilitate.”

Hmmm…

I can totally appreciate if this isn’t what was supposed to be passed as part of the CARES Act. That’s not cool.

At the same time, when you step back, the outrage here seems out of touch. Even with this, the US airline industry is getting $17.5 billion in grants, and $32.5 billion in low interest loans.

Is this really what we would call “destabilizing the industry, not helping save it?” Will this $7.5 billion really be what leads to airline bankruptcies? That’s $7.5 billion spread out across a dozen airlines, when that amount is only a bit more than US airlines collect in baggage fees every year.

Is that money going back to taxpayers really a bad thing?

Odd management & union dynamics

Perhaps what has been most interesting throughout all of this has been the dynamic between airline management and unions.

Under normal circumstances, unions spend most of their time fighting against management (largely for legitimate reasons). But in light of the current situation they’re working together towards a common purpose.

Fair enough on the surface, though I think the issue is that there has been a complete lack of acknowledgement about how actions by airline management have gotten us into this situation.

There’s also a lack of acknowledgement of the policies that the airline industry has instituted over the past many years that have caused consumers (and taxpayers) to take little sympathy on the industry.

I can appreciate airline employees are concerned about their livelihood, as are so many Americans. But does the CARES Act really tackle that comprehensively? Payroll is covered for employees through the end of September, but then what?

A vast majority of people agree demand won’t fully recover, so will they be looking for more aid then, or what’s the plan?

Bottom line

Apparently 30% of the $25 billion in payroll grants will now actually be loans. And the most powerful flight attendant in the world is arguing that the need for mega-airlines to collectively repay a total of $7.5 billion will lead to airline bankruptcy, and to the industry being destabilized even more.

Color me skeptical.

On the other end of the spectrum, you have this guy…

Conversations (36)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

MH Guest

Stupid airlines got used to the idea of taking money and not providing value. Good on Mnuchin/Trump to use common sense. They/we should expect a return for every penny loaned to these sharks. Get equity and/or a claim on future profits. Stop making meritless arguments about why taxpayers who are working hard and fighting to survive must donate money to airline employees.

0
‼ 0
Michael Guest

While I too feel some measure of “good for you” and take some amount of pleasure in their current state of affairs, I can’t overlook the fact that allowing them (absent some form of state aid) to go bankrupt or the like, to me doesn’t end up being a good deal for the public in the longer term. I agree that IF (and that’s a big IF) a major carrier were to go bankrupt (and that’s flat out bankrupt not restructure) I myself think it’s low odds that any successor would choose to pick up former employees at their then-union negotiated wage/work rule scale, honor seniority or anything like that... from a purely economic point of view- why would any new start up want to do that? I remember the days of the National Airlines, People Express, Morris Air, Kiwi, etc... yeah, it was great to be able to fly West Palm Beach to New York for like $69 or from Seattle to Portland for less than $50.. but.. I’m not so sure that this level of carrier capacity will lead to a viable, long term business model that produces sufficient return to attract the needed private equity to sustain a lasting and growing model/industry. In the end, for as much distain I may have for US carriers, I just don’t think it’s a good move for the general public and the larger economy as a whole to let one or more legacy carriers, each with their 10s of thousands of direct employees who earn fairly middle wages/benefits packages (Yes, I know that not all airline workers are middle class, but I do think a fair percentage do enjoy a wage/benefit package that puts them into some form of “middle class” so to speak) go away. I do want the US government to be a good steward and exercise strong fiduciary processes to insure that the taxpayer gets the best deal they can.. but.. and finally, I agree that there’s more to the picture than just the airlines - there’s all the infrastructure; some public and some private - that are also an integral and indispensable part as well.. so they’ll have to be factored into any solution that seems long term success.

0
‼ 0
Bear Guest

I think it unfair that many people now are not working and that pilots and flight crews are expecting close to full pay. Wake up!! I feel no simpathy for the airlines as they have treated us (me) quite poorly over the last few years. We just bailed out just a few years ago, now it is back to the trough. Perhaps we let them all fail and perhaps the new airline will offer better services. Time that we have some new blood in the industry where we are treated like customers and not as cattle. Let them fail! ( 6 times AA EXP, 2 times UA 100K, DL (Million miler) . PS Hey PARKER Thanks for the great seats!!.. I remember when AA had "more room throughout coach" PSS And thanks to the big three for devaluing my miles !.

0
‼ 0
Cody J Guest

They’re long-held multi billion $$ business. And if they are so short sighted to keep a hefty rainy day fund don’t think they have the upper hand in this negotiation. I think they should have to repay all grants with interest. I don’t pay my taxes so a $300k per year senior pilot can collect a hefty check for doing next to nothing for the next several months. That’s what this amounts too.

0
‼ 0
Dan Guest

The whole thing is that if airlines furlough people, it costs a lot of money to furlough and to hire people back and retrain. It will severely cripple an airlines ability to bounce back. As much as everyone is against airlines, smaller markets will be cut and probably left without service while airlines will have a whole lot limited options for customers. America has no great infrastructure in the US outside the northeast with Amtrak. The lifeblood of economic development for most communities in America is air service. This could hurt small to medium size cities way beyond than just sticking to the original terms. But when you have an administration that is business focused rather than public service focused, there will be winners and losers. Air service is considered an essential service to all of America and if massive furloughs and massive downsizing happens, the economic divide for recovery will be extremely bleak.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published