Ryanair Fires Cabin Crew Who Staged Photo Sleeping On Floor

How low can an airline go?

Recently I wrote about how a heavy storm in Spain cancelled plenty of flights and meant that Portuguese Ryanair crew were forced to overnight in Malaga.

Ryanair said that there were no hotels available for their crew (given so many stranded passengers were trying to find hotels). Ryanair crew say that there were hotels but Ryanair didn’t look hard enough.

A photo surfaced however, of the crew, in full uniform, sleeping on the airport floor.

Ryanair came out publicly and initially said that there were no hotels available. While the crew was eventually given access to an airport lounge, from 1:30AM until 6AM they were left in a room that didn’t even have enough chairs for everyone to sit, which is when they staged the above photograph.

After then spending some time in the lounge they flew home as passengers the following morning.

I questioned the legitimacy of the photograph at the time, mainly because of the very close proximity the crew were lying next to their colleagues, when there appeared to be plenty of space around them.

Then Ryanair tracked down airport surveillance footage of the crew ‘sleeping,’ which showed that the crew did so only to stage a photograph.

Ryanair published this video to try and defend themselves, against public outcry that their cabin crew were subject to inhumane working conditions.

Ben wrote at the time how shameful this was for Ryanair to ‘defend’ themselves against their own cabin crew. Rather than improving the way they handle these bad weather situations (which is part of being a successful airline), they create a hostile ‘us vs. them’ environment for their staff.

Rather than supporting and looking after their staff, they publicly shamed them.

Latest development

Now the BBC is reporting that the six crew who staged the photo have been fired for ‘gross misconduct,’ as Ryanair put it. It’s crazy that Ryanair thinks this is the solution to this latest public relations nightmare.

Do they really think crew will do their best to represent the airline, knowing that trying to protest how Ryanair handles cancelled flights will lead to dismissal? Is fear the way to run an airline?

I definitely don’t condone the staging of the photo but I think it was done out of desperation to improve their working conditions and I think Ryanairs response (and refusal to fix the initial problem) was much worse.

The crew were forced to spend the night sleeping in the airport terminal that night, even if it wasn’t precisely as the photo showed.

They could have come out in front of this, turned a negative into a positive, and apologised to the crew for not having accommodation available that night, and promise to do better in future. Instead they are not only creating more negative publicity for themselves, but sending a warning to all staff that saying anything negative about the airline will have severe consequences.

Bottom line

Ryanair has had a horrendous year already.

Pilot strikes, hundreds of flights cancelled because of poor management of crew rostering, yet another incredibly confusing change to their hand luggage policy, and now publicly shaming their crew.

I can’t imagine how low cabin crew morale must be at the airline right now.

I’ve been a ‘satisfied’ Ryanair customer for many years, but I’m feeling far less interested in flying with them than I was six months ago, no matter how cheap the price.

Ryanair initially operated solely on price, with no regard to what passengers wanted (beyond cheap fares). Then a few years ago they changed their strategy and launched their ‘Always Getting Better’ strategy to try and attract different types of passengers, by launching fares for business travellers, as well as more generous hand luggage allowances, and lower fees for anyone who didn’t play by the rules.

I wrote recently about how I think their new hand luggage policy will cause them to lose customers, and this latest PR disaster to me also suggests the focus is no longer attempting to attract anyone who isn’t primarily looking for the absolute cheapest price.

EasyJet and Norwegian are much better options if you are looking for a European low cost carrier.

What do you think of Ryanair’s decision to fire crew who staged this photo?

Conversations (61)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Brian Guest

Employees who lie SHOULD be fired!

0
‼ 0
platy Guest

@ Austin “If their flight attendant contract did not require RyanAir to provide them accommodation, then RyanAir went above and beyond to get them lounge space.” The airline claimed the reason that the crew was not accommodated in a hotel for the night is that the hotels were full. In making that statement the airline clearly accepts it DID have a responsibility to accommodate them, regardless of what may or may not have been in the contract of employment or what your personal perceptions may be regarding such responsibility. The crew claims that hotels were available. “the employees showed disdain and their ungratefulness towards the company.” Actually, no, the company failed in its duty of care towards the crew (by failing to provide accommodation – a task it accepts was its responsbiity per the argument above) and then went on a PR offensive making claims about no hotels being available and that the crew had only been in the crew room for a ‘short period” whereas the crew report being left for 7 – 12 hours and hotel rooms were indeed available. “wanted to be put up for the night during irrops, then they should have interviewed with full-service airlines where such perks are included.” Actually the airline has a duty of care towards its employees and to operate safely. “Their termination was 100% with cause and good” That conclusion can only be made by the relevant industrial relations tribunal / court. In the interim, you might consider the hypocrisy of the airline inflaming the situation by making their response public through their own PR machine, whilst disregarding the legal rights to privacy of its employees and potentially defrauding its shareholders on its capacity to manage labour relations (see below) “ good on RyanAir to focusing on the principals necessary to make them successful and competitive in the LCC arena.’ Actually Ryan Air is in considerable strife over the way it handles its labour relations. Shareholders include pension funds. Some have sold their shares (three recently sold up USD340 million shares out about a year ago) over mishandling of labour relations. In September 2018 at the AGM 30% of investors including the Local Authority Pension Fund Forum voted against the re-election of the airline’s chairman citing failures in management of human capital among other gripes. There is now a court case in the US (Manhattan District Court) brought a by a shareholder pension fund claiming that the airline has defrauded investors by overstating its ability to manage labour relations and keep costs down. The airline has had to accept unions as of December 2018 and that its employees’ rights may be determined under European Law under the local legislation in those countries were crew are based. Its practice of putting employees onto third party employment agency contracts is also under challenge. So…its business model isn’t exactly sustainable, is it?! Certainly nothing to praise!

0
‼ 0
Lu Guest

For everyone who feels it is acceptable to be in your uniform without a space for a real reprieve or sleep throughout the night, I'd say "let's see!" Until you've spent time in someone else's shoes, you will not know how you will feel or behave. Employers have a responsibility to make sure they provide a safe work space for their employees. For all flight crewmembers this includes a safe hotel room between flights whether planned or unplanned. Please keep in mind all flight crew members are considered to be working for the duration of time/days spent at work, even while on a layover. This responsibility to take-care of their employees certainly was not demonstrated by Ryan Airlines. Flight Attendants are not only safety ambassadors, but also security ambassadors of the airline they represent. Being fatigued on the job is a real hazard in this profession. When Flight Attendants are at work (whether "deadheading", or active duty) they are representing the airline and subject to rules of the FAA, DOT, and company policies. While it may be against company policy to be in photos that show the company in a negative light, these Flight Attendants opened a conversation for how human beings should be treated, while at work. Human Beings are not robots, even when meant to behave in that light by corporations that are single-minded in their quest for the all-mighty dollar. Wall Street is dictating how people are behaving towards each other in world. Why do we no longer have empathy for one another? Deep in your soul, where a light is still flickering to be seen and expressed, we all know right, from wrong. These Human Beings should have been showed some humanity. And... still can!

0
‼ 0
SC New Member

The way this has played out has continued to make Ryan Air look worse and worse. To brush the original photo off as staged is disingenuous. The crew did not leave some plush hotel room to lie on the floor and slander the company. They were not provided with beds, and simply illustrated the only way they could have attempted to get some sleep that night. The alternative was to sit awake in folding chairs all night. This is hardly a "staged" manipulation. Ryan Air disgusts me. I vowed four years ago to never fly them again. I even connect in Munich or Zürich to avoid giving this company my business.

0
‼ 0
Pierre Guest

To be honest, much as one loves to hate Ryanair, I imagine this would qualify as gross misconduct pretty much anywhere. Procedures should be applied evenly across the board to ensure equity for all parties. The result of gross misconduct is always the same.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member