United & JetBlue: Could We See A Merger, Partnership, Or What?

United & JetBlue: Could We See A Merger, Partnership, Or What?

32

It has been a fascinating several months for JetBlue. The airline has struggled with profitability post-pandemic, given how the environment has changed. Even the most profitable airlines are barely making profits from flying passengers, but instead, make their money from other aspects of their business, like the loyalty programs.

In recent months, JetBlue executives have made it clear that they’re in talks with other airlines about launching new partnerships. One possible outcome was that JetBlue could partner with American, but we learned yesterday that those talks broke down, because “JetBlue was focused on different business priorities.”

It’s becoming increasingly clear what airline JetBlue will collaborate with. The big question is what kind of cooperation we’re going to see.

We know United is very interested in JetBlue

Earlier this year, @xJonNYC reported that United was internally closely looking at some sort of deal with JetBlue. He made it clear that this didn’t necessarily mean that negotiations were taking place, but rather that it was being examined at the airline.

I have sources telling me UA is heavily looking at B6 — merger or buying assets or something else I’m not remotely sure at the moment.

— JonNYC (@xjonnyc.bsky.social) January 29, 2025 at 2:38 PM

The rumor spread like wildfire and was in some cases taken out of context, causing United to even file an SEC 8-K, clarifying that it “is not in negotiations or discussions with any other airline regarding a merger, acquisition or similar strategic transaction and has not been in any recent discussions with any airlines regarding the same.” The way I view it, that wasn’t actually a denial of any of the claims, about it being looked at internally.

Just weeks later, United CEO Scott Kirby basically confirmed that he could see further indusrtry consolidation, saying that “JetBlue is the obvious candidate,” and that “the ball is going to be in JetBlue’s court.” In fairness, he also indicated that mergers are headaches, and that it might be less likely than some people think.

But still, we know that United is generally interested in doing something with JetBlue, and we know that JetBlue is walking away from any sort of a deal with American.

I also think you can’t overstate two things, as they impact some sort of a deal:

  • Kirby is the airline industry’s most ambitious guy, and he’s determined to overtake Delta and become the most profitable airline
  • Kirby feels really strongly that United leaving JFK was a big mistake, and he has gone on record as saying that he wishes he could “roll back the clock and change that decision”
JetBlue seems like an attractive acquisition target

JetBlue would be a great fit for United

JetBlue is an airline that’s generally loved by passengers. There’s only one major issue — the airline struggles to make money (minor detail, I know!). Unlike some low cost carriers, JetBlue isn’t hemorrhaging money in a way that puts it at immediate risk, but the airline also can’t seem to turn a profit, despite having a strong position in some lucrative markets.

Last year, I wrote about how JetBlue could be an attractive acquisition target for several airlines. Specific to the United rumor, I can totally see how United would find value in acquiring JetBlue:

  • We know that United has desperately been wanting to return to New York (JFK), but can’t get available gate space; JetBlue has a huge presence there
  • We know that United has been looking closely at opening a hub in Florida, and JetBlue has a hub in Fort Lauderdale (FLL)
  • JetBlue and United have largely complementary fleets, as JetBlue primarily has Airbus A320-family aircraft, which United also has; I’m sure United also wouldn’t mind adding Airbus A220s to its fleet, as they’re lovely planes

United as an airline is very much trending upwards. Not only is United now the world’s largest airline, but it’s increasingly in Delta’s league when it comes to profitability. There’s no denying that a JetBlue acquisition would not only help United become even more dominant in terms of size, but also give it access to the two markets it’s most hoping to expand to (JFK and Florida).

Now, I think it goes without saying that American would probably also be mighty interested in acquiring JetBlue, given that the two airlines had a Northeast Alliance, which was ultimately blocked by regulators under the Biden administration. JetBlue could greatly help American in both New York (JFK) and Boston (BOS).

However, given the respective financial performance of United and American, I suspect the former would be in more of a position to win in any bidding war, and also to gain regulatory approval.

United has a lot to gain with a JetBlue acquisition

Would this deal get regulatory approval, though?

Of course a logical question would be whether an airline like United acquiring JetBlue would get regulatory approval. Under the Biden administration, we saw JetBlue try to acquire Spirit, only for the Department of Justice to block that, arguing it was important to maintain ultra low cost carrier competition.

I thought that was the wrong decision — in the meantime, Spirit has upended its business model, went through bankruptcy, and it’s anyone’s guess what the carrier’s future holds.

While the Trump administration claims it will still block mergers that aren’t good for competition, I suspect the execution will be a bit different than under the Biden administration. United also donated to Trump’s inauguration, and Kirby has had nothing but good things to say about Trump and his tariff policies.

That being said, call it a hot take, but I’m not sure more industry consolidation is a bad thing. And I’m not even sure United acquiring JetBlue would be bad for consumers. Why? Well, simply put, an airline can only afford to have tickets subsidized by shareholders for so long before something needs to change.

Specific to United acquiring JetBlue, let’s think about this for a second:

  • This would be massively positive for JetBlue employees, who would be getting major pay increases, to align with United’s pay scales
  • I’d argue that having a second major global airline with a hub in South Florida would be good news for consumers
  • This would be great news for competition in New York City; currently Delta and American have a much bigger presence at Kennedy and LaGuardia, so it would be great to get a more competitive third player there
  • United is simply in a much better position to leverage JetBlue’s assets to turn a profit, especially given that airlines largely make money through their loyalty programs nowadays, and don’t actually earn that much flying passengers
  • Fundamentally what’s important is that the airline industry maintains and grows capacity, and keeping airlines not making money alive doesn’t do a whole lot to forward that goal; I mean, just look at all the new aircraft deliveries that JetBlue has deferred

If United were to acquire JetBlue, I suspect it would be similar to Alaska acquiring Hawaiian, where the Hawaiian operation would go from money-losing to almost profitable overnight, due to simply better utilizing assets.

I think the reality that some people refuse to accept is that US airline tickets are essentially subsidized by credit card agreements. Even the most profitable airlines (Delta and United) have virtually non-existent margins if we’re going to compare passenger revenue per available seat mile to cost per available seat mile. Large airlines have the power to offer much more lucrative loyalty programs, because there’s power in scale.

United could make a lot more money with JetBlue’s A321LRs

At a minimum, a partnership is imminent

On an earnings call today, JetBlue President Marty St. George revealed some interesting details. He announced that the airline will announce a domestic airline partner this quarter. As he explained it:

“If you are a customer in the Northeast and you love JetBlue for leisure, but twice a year you have to go to Omaha or Boise, these are places that you can’t earn TrueBlue points on now and when this partnership goes forward, you will be able to.”

Alaska and Delta have confirmed that they’re not pursuing a partnership with JetBlue, so I think this makes it pretty clear that a United partnership is imminent.

I still struggle to see how this arrangement will work, though. Is this simply about frequent flyer reciprocity, as a first step to closer cooperation? Or how exactly will the airline tie their networks together, since it’s not like United needs more feed.

Furthermore, any sort of joint venture would also require regulatory approval, and the way I view it, that might be just as challenging as a merger. So at a minimum, it seems like a partnership is imminent, and then we’ll see where things go from there.

It sounds like a partnership could happen soon

Bottom line

We know that United sees strategic value in JetBlue. We also know that JetBlue has been in talks with other airlines about a partnership, and has just called off talks with American, to pursue “different business priorities.” JetBlue has now announced that a new partnership will be announced soon.

All of this sure makes one wonder where exactly this is all headed. Given how the economics of the airline industry have evolved, I’d argue that a merger is most efficient, would make sense for both companies, and would ultimately benefit consumers (in the sense that JetBlue is losing money, but would probably become profitable almost instantly if acquired by United, given loyalty program profits and scale).

Admittedly that has its challenges, especially when it comes to regulatory approval. More immediately, it sounds like we’ll see some sort of a partnership, but I imagine that could lead to more developments in the future.

What do you make of the United and JetBlue situation, and how do you see this playing out?

Conversations (32)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Tory Guest

    It’s confirmed it’s UA-JB: https://www.reuters.com/business/jetblue-negotiates-partnership-with-united-airlines-sources-say-2025-04-29/

    ” JetBlue Airways and United Airlines have been negotiating a partnership, three industry sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

    The partnership with United is envisioned as quite different from the NEA, the sources said. While the alliance is expected to focus on providing greater connectivity to customers and allowing them to earn and burn frequent-flier miles, the two carriers will not coordinate on schedules and pricing, they added.”

    As...

    It’s confirmed it’s UA-JB: https://www.reuters.com/business/jetblue-negotiates-partnership-with-united-airlines-sources-say-2025-04-29/

    ” JetBlue Airways and United Airlines have been negotiating a partnership, three industry sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

    The partnership with United is envisioned as quite different from the NEA, the sources said. While the alliance is expected to focus on providing greater connectivity to customers and allowing them to earn and burn frequent-flier miles, the two carriers will not coordinate on schedules and pricing, they added.”

    As far as JFK, UA may or may not lease slots from JB, but it doesn’t really matter. UA loses the loyalty of some West Coast fliers because they can’t get them to Long Island nonstop, but now those fliers can just use JB (and Mint) for those flights.

  2. StevieMIA Guest

    so ridiculous of some people to call for mergers and wish this type of consolidation in the american market, I swear you wait for the day the USA has a new PanAm, and everyone is forced to fly one only airline. Hopefully nothing comes to fruition, and JetBlue, Spirit and Frontier stay the same even if it means they will struggle for years.

    1. OpenSky11 Guest

      GMAFB Steve.

      Some of us have families to feed. Maybe it wouldn't be so bad if you and your family struggled for a few years.

      Think about how awful your comment is.

  3. Bill Guest

    It is not going to be a merger. That would be a waste of time and money and would be blocked. A partnership would benefit both. Airlines are making money not by flying but by people's participation in frequent flyer programs. With a partnership, a B6 regular flying from SFO-JFK in Mint would be able to redeem on one of the many non-stop flights from SFO that are served by UA and not possible on...

    It is not going to be a merger. That would be a waste of time and money and would be blocked. A partnership would benefit both. Airlines are making money not by flying but by people's participation in frequent flyer programs. With a partnership, a B6 regular flying from SFO-JFK in Mint would be able to redeem on one of the many non-stop flights from SFO that are served by UA and not possible on B6. More credit card spend goes to B6 to gain status and more points. UA flyers that were lost when UA left JFK can also be brought back into the fold by enabling people to use B6 for JFK and UA for other flights. B6 flyers get a greatly expanded network and UA gets more relevance at JFK/BOS/SJU/Florida. It is a win, win.

  4. stogieguy7 Diamond

    A lot of naysayers here for some reason. The way I see it, JetBlue would be an excellent match up for UA. They're really strong in the northeast (UA, not so much) and in south Florida via FLL (again, UA not so much). The fleet could be incorporated into UA's system with no problem. And JetBlue? Suddenly, the go from being an irrelevance in the middle of the country to being (in some way) at...

    A lot of naysayers here for some reason. The way I see it, JetBlue would be an excellent match up for UA. They're really strong in the northeast (UA, not so much) and in south Florida via FLL (again, UA not so much). The fleet could be incorporated into UA's system with no problem. And JetBlue? Suddenly, the go from being an irrelevance in the middle of the country to being (in some way) at part of the dominant carrier there.

    And, as far as competitive concerns: the senile one and his mini-Marxist handlers are out now. This administration will be more accepting to something like this. Yes, it's likely that some gates will have to be divested in overly covered areas, but that's not a big deal. From my perspective, a partnership would be beneficial but an acquisition would be the best for all concerned.

    1. ImmortalSynn Guest

      This is one of the most ignorant posts I've seen on here in the post-Dunn era.

      You're just going to completely ignore that UA already has the largest hub by pax count in the NYC area, has another major hub 180nmi away, and pretend that they "not so much" for strength in the northeast?

      Since when was UA "the dominant carrier" in the middle of the country? If you're counting the central and mountain time...

      This is one of the most ignorant posts I've seen on here in the post-Dunn era.

      You're just going to completely ignore that UA already has the largest hub by pax count in the NYC area, has another major hub 180nmi away, and pretend that they "not so much" for strength in the northeast?

      Since when was UA "the dominant carrier" in the middle of the country? If you're counting the central and mountain time zones, they're actually the 3rd largest by passenger count.

      But you sure speak with a lot of confidence, so carry on.

  5. Alan Guest

    Based on what Marty said on the call, I seem to think that a partnership is the most likely outcome. I’ve said this many times before, but I think a partnership is the best outcome for both parties. JetBlue brand loyalists get to keep flying with the carrier while also having more options through an expanded network, while united would get some of what it wants in terms of JFK/FLL. Marty seems to be implying...

    Based on what Marty said on the call, I seem to think that a partnership is the most likely outcome. I’ve said this many times before, but I think a partnership is the best outcome for both parties. JetBlue brand loyalists get to keep flying with the carrier while also having more options through an expanded network, while united would get some of what it wants in terms of JFK/FLL. Marty seems to be implying that you’ll be able to earn/burn true blue points on these new roots that he’s talking about, implying that the loyalty program will stay around in some fashion, which implies that JetBlue itself will stay around. Now I’m no expert on this situation however that’s just my interpretation.

    1. Alan Guest

      In my previous comment, I referred to JetBlue brand loyalists. I want to make clear that I do not mean this in any sort of negative connotation. What I should have said is that flyers who know and love the airlines brand will continue to get the experience they know and love while also benefiting from United expanded network. I apologize if the language in my previous comment made anyone feel upset or uncomfortable

  6. Tory Guest

    My bet is on some sort of strategic partnership rather than acquisition. Why would UA want to immediately raise JB employees to UA salary levels?! That just makes it *less* competitive. Not to mention years of integration headaches. A simple alliance-type partnership (like AA and Alaska) seems to make the most sense since they have so little network overlap (similar to AA and Alaska - and yes, this means I think east and west NYC...

    My bet is on some sort of strategic partnership rather than acquisition. Why would UA want to immediately raise JB employees to UA salary levels?! That just makes it *less* competitive. Not to mention years of integration headaches. A simple alliance-type partnership (like AA and Alaska) seems to make the most sense since they have so little network overlap (similar to AA and Alaska - and yes, this means I think east and west NYC metro are fairly separate markets since it's so hard to cross from one side to the other).

    But Ben you make very good points about the importance of credit cards. And Kirby has said something similar in relation to the importance of being #1 in a market (= disproportionate credit card win). An alliance would make JB more attractive vs Delta in Boston and east NYC and vs AA in South Florida. Would it make sense for them to have some sort of joint credit card? Or are frequent-flier mutual benefits good enough?

    1. yoloswag420 Guest

      I just don't see how it makes sense or would work. Given that UA operates 0 flights out of B6's largest hub in JFK. There's no real connectivity between their networks.

      AA worked because AA has a sizeable presence at JFK and a modest focus city operation in BOS, which does synergize strongly w/ B6.

    2. Bill Guest

      The AA partnership with B6 was what AA wanted. UA/B6 would be about mutual benefits. UA gains access to JFK through B6 and B6 passengers can connect from points in the center of the country they fly to on to UA the rest of the way. It expands the reach of both carriers--and it is not just about trying to boost AA's weak position at JFK.

    3. Tory Guest

      There are a lot of fliers in BOS, JFK/LGA, and FLL that would maybe like to be loyal to JB but don't because it can't get them to a lot of destinations. Now it can via UA hubs. That levels the playing field for JB vs. DL (BOS, JFK/LGA) and AA (MIA). UA gets to tap a lot of passengers in those same places that otherwise wouldn't even consider UA, especially for international trips.

      As...

      There are a lot of fliers in BOS, JFK/LGA, and FLL that would maybe like to be loyal to JB but don't because it can't get them to a lot of destinations. Now it can via UA hubs. That levels the playing field for JB vs. DL (BOS, JFK/LGA) and AA (MIA). UA gets to tap a lot of passengers in those same places that otherwise wouldn't even consider UA, especially for international trips.

      As far as JFK, UA may or may not lease slots from JB, but it doesn’t really matter. UA loses the loyalty of some West Coast fliers because they can’t get them to Long Island nonstop, but now those fliers can just use JB (and Mint) for those flights.

  7. James Guest

    Transferring my credit card points to B6 now as a backdoor to become UA miles...

  8. Justsaying Guest

    A merger would be blocked. United should not be able to get EWR and then JFK, BOS, and Florida slots. That’s way too much overlap in the NYC market alone and creates an unfair advantage. Partnership is a possibility but a merger nope

    1. OpenSky11 Guest

      BOS, FL, and EWR are not slot controlled.

  9. Antwerp Guest

    Omaha and Boise were carefully chosen as examples. Because both WN and UA fly there. It's not unreasonable to assume that WN is also looking at B6.

    1. Brent Guest

      In fact, WN is the largest out of both of those airports. One issue that B6 needs to fix: Hawaii access. The partnership with HA winds down in June. WN has a lot of excess capacity in Hawaii.

      WN is really strong in Florida, but more Tampa and Orlando than FLL. Also some good presence in places like DEN and BNA.

      For WN, B6 would give their frequent fliers even better Caribbean access and transatlantic...

      In fact, WN is the largest out of both of those airports. One issue that B6 needs to fix: Hawaii access. The partnership with HA winds down in June. WN has a lot of excess capacity in Hawaii.

      WN is really strong in Florida, but more Tampa and Orlando than FLL. Also some good presence in places like DEN and BNA.

      For WN, B6 would give their frequent fliers even better Caribbean access and transatlantic connections out of the Northeast.

      My money is on United, but WN makes a ton of sense too. And B6 would be treated more like a peer in that partnership. A B6 partnership with UA risks the frequent flyer program being overshadowed by Mileage Plus. And that's been the biggest focus for B6 in the last 6 months. They are really trying to create value in the loyalty program.

  10. Dick Bupkiss Guest

    Regulatory approval? You've got to be kidding. United has already made their payoffs to the current administration, that's all the regulatory approval they need.

    Fort Lauderdale as a United hub? Seriously?

    Other than access to slots at JFK, I don't see anything that JetBlue has to offer that could benefit United much.

    JetBlue looks like a much better match (to me) to partner with Alaska than United, but sounds like Alaska's still busy. Too bad,...

    Regulatory approval? You've got to be kidding. United has already made their payoffs to the current administration, that's all the regulatory approval they need.

    Fort Lauderdale as a United hub? Seriously?

    Other than access to slots at JFK, I don't see anything that JetBlue has to offer that could benefit United much.

    JetBlue looks like a much better match (to me) to partner with Alaska than United, but sounds like Alaska's still busy. Too bad, they would fit nicely into Alaska's growing network.

    1. BradStPete Diamond

      yeah... I cant imagine what UA would do with FLL

  11. Sharon Guest

    Why is Southwest not being considered?

    Southwest traditionally would not consider this, though since their business is under siege it is possible. They could use denver and Nashville as connection centers. Very little overlap besides FLL and MCO.

    If United, partnership would be better than takeover. United has UnitedNext and taking over JetBlue would be very distracting with legal and tech barriers.

    1. Bill Guest

      B6 is going after premium traffic and international connectivity. WN does nothing for them on those fronts.

  12. Watson Diamond

    I'm pretty sure all Kirby has to do is claim that the 2020 election was stolen and Agent Orange will direct the DOJ to allow anything UA wants.

  13. Mark Guest

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/29/jetblue-partner-airline.html

    JetBlue advising a partnership will be announced in the next few weeks. DL says it's not them, AS/HA say they're focused on the merger, AA already said their talks are done.

    So that leaves Spirit, Frontier, or United.

    1. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ Mark -- JetBlue's president used Boise and Omaha as examples. Spirit doesn't fly to Omaha, and Frontier doesn't fly to Boise (yet). So I think that makes it pretty clear who he was referring to. :-)

    2. NXFlyer Guest

      United is not the only other airline flying to both OMA & BOI outside of AA/AS/DL. WN & G4 both do, so would also be options for partnership based on the above way of thinking.

      G4 perhaps less obvious, but with the significant structural changes at WN and the reciprocal benefits both have (upgauged aircraft for WN popular routes, feed for B6s poorly performing international network and a premium product that WN could sell...

      United is not the only other airline flying to both OMA & BOI outside of AA/AS/DL. WN & G4 both do, so would also be options for partnership based on the above way of thinking.

      G4 perhaps less obvious, but with the significant structural changes at WN and the reciprocal benefits both have (upgauged aircraft for WN popular routes, feed for B6s poorly performing international network and a premium product that WN could sell to compete more with the legacies). Even AS is not fully turning down its an option, just not a current focus and not as strong as DLs 'no upcoming announcements'.

      It's not immediately clear UA is the only option.

  14. DTWNYC Guest

    Premise is flawed.

    "We know that United has desperately been wanting to return to New York (JFK), but can’t get available gate space; JetBlue has a huge presence there"

    While that might be true, they don't want, not would the government allow, United to acquire all the assets of B6 at JFK. Significant reductions would be needed.

    "We know that United has been looking closely at opening a hub in Florida, and JetBlue has a...

    Premise is flawed.

    "We know that United has desperately been wanting to return to New York (JFK), but can’t get available gate space; JetBlue has a huge presence there"

    While that might be true, they don't want, not would the government allow, United to acquire all the assets of B6 at JFK. Significant reductions would be needed.

    "We know that United has been looking closely at opening a hub in Florida, and JetBlue has a hub in Fort Lauderdale (FLL)"

    No they are not. United does not need, nor wants a FL hub.

    "JetBlue and United have largely complementary fleets, as JetBlue primarily has Airbus A320-family aircraft, which United also has; I’m sure United also wouldn’t mind adding Airbus A220s to its fleet, as they’re lovely planes"

    Ever heard of scope clauses? A220 is DOA and United will not take sure old A320 Airbuses.

    1. Ben Schlappig OMAAT

      @ DTWNYC -- "While that might be true, they don't want, not would the government allow, United to acquire all the assets of B6 at JFK. Significant reductions would be needed."

      That depends. Ultimately approval for this deal would be contingent on the extent to which the DOJ views EWR and JFK/LGA as separate markets. Obviously United views them as different markets, or else Kirby wouldn't make returning to JFK such a priority.

      "Ever heard...

      @ DTWNYC -- "While that might be true, they don't want, not would the government allow, United to acquire all the assets of B6 at JFK. Significant reductions would be needed."

      That depends. Ultimately approval for this deal would be contingent on the extent to which the DOJ views EWR and JFK/LGA as separate markets. Obviously United views them as different markets, or else Kirby wouldn't make returning to JFK such a priority.

      "Ever heard of scope clauses? A220 is DOA and United will not take sure old A320 Airbuses."

      I have heard of scope clauses, of course. What am I missing? Just like at Delta, they'd be mainline jets (and Delta even flies the smaller -100, while JetBlue only flies the larger -300).

    2. DTWNYC Guest

      "@ DTWNYC -- "While that might be true, they don't want, not would the government allow, United to acquire all the assets of B6 at JFK. Significant reductions would be needed."

      That depends. Ultimately approval for this deal would be contingent on the extent to which the DOJ views EWR and JFK/LGA as separate markets. Obviously United views them as different markets, or else Kirby wouldn't make returning to JFK such a priority."

      @Ben, there...

      "@ DTWNYC -- "While that might be true, they don't want, not would the government allow, United to acquire all the assets of B6 at JFK. Significant reductions would be needed."

      That depends. Ultimately approval for this deal would be contingent on the extent to which the DOJ views EWR and JFK/LGA as separate markets. Obviously United views them as different markets, or else Kirby wouldn't make returning to JFK such a priority."

      @Ben, there is no way that the DOJ is going to allow one airline to have two hubs with 100s of flights per day, roughly serving the exact same markets in the same metro region. Never going to happen. EWR is the golden goose, so "IF" this happens, JFK would have to be cut to virtually nothing, and giving the slots to UA's biggest competitors, DL and AA.

      "I have heard of scope clauses, of course. What am I missing? Just like at Delta, they'd be mainline jets (and Delta even flies the smaller -100, while JetBlue only flies the larger -300)."

      UA has not given any interest to the A220 model. While we don't know exactly why, the speculation is they can't make the economics work with mainline pay scales, and it's more cost effective to just use 737s with a larger seat count. Plus the A220 has proven to be a lemon, especially with the PW GTF engines.

    3. ImmortalSynn Guest

      "United does not need, nor wants a FL hub"
      "UA has not given any interest to the A220 model."

      Why are you writing this, as if you know what United internally wants or shows interest in?

    4. Justsaying Guest

      A merger would be blocked. United should not be able to get EWR and then JFK, BOS, and Florida slots. That’s way too much overlap in the NYC market alone and creates an unfair advantage. Partnership is a possibility but a merger nope.

  15. Dn10 Guest

    I think the nyc consolidation should be blocked given United’s strength at EWR

    1. JustinB Diamond

      Agreed... the question is who would want to take UA slots at EWR?

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Watson Diamond

I'm pretty sure all Kirby has to do is claim that the 2020 election was stolen and Agent Orange will direct the DOJ to allow anything UA wants.

2
stogieguy7 Diamond

A lot of naysayers here for some reason. The way I see it, JetBlue would be an excellent match up for UA. They're really strong in the northeast (UA, not so much) and in south Florida via FLL (again, UA not so much). The fleet could be incorporated into UA's system with no problem. And JetBlue? Suddenly, the go from being an irrelevance in the middle of the country to being (in some way) at part of the dominant carrier there. And, as far as competitive concerns: the senile one and his mini-Marxist handlers are out now. This administration will be more accepting to something like this. Yes, it's likely that some gates will have to be divested in overly covered areas, but that's not a big deal. From my perspective, a partnership would be beneficial but an acquisition would be the best for all concerned.

1
Justsaying Guest

A merger would be blocked. United should not be able to get EWR and then JFK, BOS, and Florida slots. That’s way too much overlap in the NYC market alone and creates an unfair advantage. Partnership is a possibility but a merger nope

1
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,527,136 Miles Traveled

39,914,500 Words Written

42,354 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT