German Chancellor Airplane Face Mask Controversy

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has gotten some bad press regarding a transatlantic flight he took from Germany to Canada earlier this week, and I think it’s warranted. I first wrote about this a couple of days ago, though the story gets even more interesting, following the return flight to Germany.

Germany still requires masks on planes

While masks were required on most airlines around the globe for the better part of two years, at this point we’ve seen many countries make mask wearing optional. In Europe, one of the only remaining countries to continue requiring masks on planes is Germany.

Not only does Germany continue to require masks, but the current administration has approved an extension of this policy through April 7, 2023, meaning mask wearing will likely be required for well over seven additional months. On top of that, Germany is tightening restrictions around the types of masks travelers can wear, requiring N95-style masks. This is being done in anticipation of an increase of coronavirus cases in the fall and winter.

We all have our own opinions when it comes to masking on planes — personally I appreciate the ability to make my own choice, given that nowadays we have quality masks that provide a high level of protection to the person wearing them as well, and we also have treatments that can minimize the serious risk of coronavirus.

I know many aren’t happy about Germany having extended its mask requirement, and behavior by Chancellor Scholz isn’t helping with that sentiment.

Germany still requires masks on planes

German Chancellor Scholz flies maskless

On Monday, Chancellor Scholz flew from Germany to Canada with quite an entourage on a German government Airbus A340-300. In addition to being accompanied by Economy and Climate Minister Robert Habeck, he was also accompanied by more than 80 other passengers, mostly journalists.

Based on the videos and pictures from the flight, virtually no one was wearing a mask, which seems to contradict the government’s stance (for that matter, the Canadian government also requires masking on planes). A government spokesperson has tried to justify this in two ways, both of which I find to be rather ridiculous:

  • It’s claimed that “there is no mask requirement on Air Force flights,” though Germany’s Infection Protection Act doesn’t mention this exemption; for that matter, it would be ridiculous and a very bad look if Germany just excluded government jets from this requirement
  • It’s claimed that “all participants on the trip must present a current negative PCR test prior to departure,” which is also true for some travel destinations out of Germany, yet masks are still required on those flights

The story gets even more interesting

Chancellor Scholz has now completed his return flight to Germany, traveling with the same entourage. Did the bad optics surrounding the mask policy have an impact on behavior on the return flight? Nope. It’s reported that Scholz and most passengers still didn’t wear masks on the return flight.

But here’s what makes this even more noteworthy. Remember how one of the justifications given for not requiring masks was that everyone had to take a PCR test? Well, that only applied before the outbound flight, and not the return flight, which was several days later.

A government spokesperson was asked about this, and here’s how that went:

Journalist: “Mr Hebestreit, you or a spokesman for the federal government said that there was a high level of protection because everyone on board the plane had to have a current negative PCR test. There were several flights. You didn’t just fly from Berlin to Canada, but then further and further and then back again. This means that each person had to show several PCR tests, correct?”

Government spokesperson: “No, that’s not correct. To start the journey, which began on Sunday, every participant on this journey had to present a current PCR test that was not older than 24 hours.”

Another journalist asked if troops being transported on government planes had to wear masks. Here’s the answer:

“The A400M is usually used for troop transports in the operational areas. Masks are generally compulsory here.”

Bottom line

German Chancellor Scholz is being criticized for not masking on a German government jet, even though Germany continues to have a mask mandate for aviation. A government spokesperson provided lame excuses, suggesting that everyone was tested (which only applied prior to the first flight, and not prior to travel on subsequent days), and that the law doesn’t apply on government planes (which also isn’t a good look, even though apparently troops being transported have to wear masks).

It’s disappointing to see the lack of leadership here. If the German government thinks that it’s important for people to wear masks on planes, then the German Chancellor should be leading by example, especially in front of media, to show that he’s not above the rules.

Even if masks weren’t technically required on government planes, you’d think Scholz could acknowledge the situation and say it’s the right thing to do (based on everyone else being told it’s the right thing to do), rather than doubling down with lame excuses.

What do you make of this German government face mask controversy?

(Featured image courtesy of BriYYZ)

Conversations (64)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Marcus Guest

Asking govt officials to comply with their own regulations? Das ist unmoglich!

0
‼ 0
OliverBoliver Member

I flew from Hamburg to Helsinki two weeks ago. No masks at the airport or on the plane. What exactly are the rules? Just flights into Germany and not at all once off the plane?

0
‼ 0
Indopithecus Guest

Typical hypocrisy by the West.

0
‼ 0
Les. Guest Guest

The elite so called leaders dont flow their own rules...rules are for the common folk not for the ruling party...pathetic

0
‼ 0
joshua Guest

To date the available body of scientific research has shown that one way masking (IE if you want to protect yourself, you wear a mask) with an N95 or equivlent mask is very successful at protecting the wearer. Surgical masks have a very modest if any benefit. Cloth masks are straight garbage. So its simple. If you think you are at high risk from a covid-19 infection, you need to wear an N-95. What anyone else does makes no difference. If you don't think you are at high risk, then dont worry about what anyone else does. But do remember that covid is never going away. If you will be in better health in the future than you are now(finishing treatment, getting vaccinated, etc), then do what you can to delay catching covid. OTOH, if you are as healthy as you are going to get right now, there is no point in delaying catching coivd. I'm not advocating for covid parties, but you cannot wear an N95 forever, and you cannot avoid covid forever, so just live your life and let the cards fall where they may.

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published