Is Thai Airways finally putting a 747 on their LAX route?!

There are a few things in the world so illogical that I lose sleep over them. One of those things is why Thai Airways doesn’t have a first class product to LAX. Hear me out.

Thai used to have two nonstop flights to the US, one to New York and one to Los Angeles. A couple of years back they cut their JFK nonstop flight, given what a gas guzzler it was at 17+ hours of flight time.

Then on May 1 they discontinued the nonstop Bangkok to Los Angeles flight, given that it too was a gas guzzler and that they were planning on retiring their A340-500 aircraft that operated the route. Instead they switched the route to a 777-200 and added a stop in Seoul Incheon. I can see why the stop in Seoul Incheon and switch to a 777 make sense, given that not only is the aircraft more efficient, but also that there are huge cost savings in carrying only 12+ hours of fuel at a time vs. 18+ hours worth of fuel (since you burn quite a bit of fuel just carrying excess fuel, not to mention it often comes at the expense of cargo, which is a big money maker). But what I didn’t understand about the added stop is that they didn’t instead put a 747 or 777-300ER on the route, since the 777-200 aircraft don’t have a first class cabin.

Here’s the thing — Thai Airways admits they lose money on their first class product, and that they basically keep it around for “royalty.” There’s no other airline where I’ve as consistently run into other award passengers. Still, that’s not to say they can’t strategically schedule their aircraft.

They fly 747s to cities like Rome and Madrid, so surely Los Angeles would work at least as well, right? I mean, I have to assume there’s a decent amount of paid first class traffic in Los Angeles compared to some other cities they presently operate the 747 to.

Well, it seems they finally agree, because as of March 31, 2013, the schedule suggests that Thai’s Los Angeles to Bangkok service will be operated by the 747, and first class award space is wide open!

This is pretty exciting news because Star Alliance first class options between North America and Asia (without going to Europe) are pretty limited. The only airlines that consistently release first class award space are Air China, Asiana, United, and now Thai.

Of those four options I’d almost always choose Thai, especially if departing Bangkok thanks to their amazing ground experience, which I’ve written about here, here, here, and here (yes, those are links to the trip reports and not the emergency exits).

The one disclaimer I’d add is that Thai is notorious for adjusting their schedule, so I wouldn’t completely count on the launch date. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them start the service months earlier, months later, or not at all.

But at least it’s a positive sign…


Thai Airways first class

(Tip of the hat to usairelite)

Conversations (23)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Seal Guest

I LOVED the LAX-BKK non-stop. Heading to Asia I go out of my way to fly Thai.

0
‼ 0
Flyer Fun Guest

@Lucky. Glad to hear that. I have been avoiding Thai First Class. However, after I finish my Singapore First Class Trip (from when they released all that space), maybe I will try to book.

0
‼ 0
YVR604miler Guest

Ben, While I agree it's not as profitable as it can be, to say they're doing it for the prestige and for the royal family is not simply inaccurate. Let’s explore a bit deeper. Think about those outstanding amenities and ground services TG provides at their hubs especially in BKK. These first class "ground" services were not created for prestige and royal family. For once, the royal family members will NEVER USE those ground services. When a royal family member travels, they utilize the airport VIP room (if not taken directly to the aircraft and in some cases, private military or government aircraft), not TG first class lounge or the spa or the golfing cart. TG (i.e. Thai government) implemented this top notch services to create a long lasting impression and to be recognized "differently" in the world as a top notch service to a "choice" destination for the many "$$$$" tourists and investors, in particular tourists from Europe and investors from within Asia, especially China. Thailand's government has a very ambitious goal to create and ensure Thailand remains as the world top tourist destination and business prospect choice. Take this for example, Sweden has about 9 M populations. Over 5M Swedish visit Thailand every year. TG ensures service on this route is "outstanding" and especially in first and business class. Take a look at F revenue inventory stat for STO-BKK. Then take a look at F revenue inventory between major Chinese hubs and BKK. Tourism is one of the biggest industries in Thailand. The government is in a very clear way utilizing the national airline almost as an immediate gateway and immediate welcome to the tourists. They set their objectives to provide outstanding service (i.e. treat them tourists like a VIP, make them happy in hope they’ll spend a lot of money while at destination). The government wants these tourists to fall in love with Thailand starting with fall in love with TG and exclusively travel on TG as their “preferred” airline when travelling to Thailand. One other [important] reason why TG is generous with F award space, it’s because TG is actually one of a few airlines where “loyalty” principle remains true in its purest definition. This is simply a “principle” (some may argue a norm) in Thai culture. Thai people are very loyal and kind. Many business are conducted based on this principle. Unlike many other airlines, your long time loyalty doesn’t always [and infrequent] get you to the F seat. TG makes those F seats available for awards as a way to say thank-you. For every TG flights with three cabin service, there are an identified number of F seats identified as award seats. They may or may not sell them but they have been marked. It’s a very convoluted process but it is based on a very simple strategy and that is to award the loyal customers, NOT just the prestige and the royal family (the latter is not even true at all).

0
‼ 0
lucky OMAAT

@ YVR604miler -- I think you misinterpreted my post. 50 years ago first class profitable because people paid for it. Post-recession it's not so profitable anymore. My point was simple -- the cabin ISN'T profitable, though Thai is keeping it. To me that means they're doing it either for the prestige or for the royal family. There's a reason virtually every privately owned airline is getting rid of first class.

0
‼ 0
YVR604miler Guest

You couldn't possibly think TG has first class cabin for the sole purpose of keeping afloat F award pax and royal family members. You're talking out of your rear. Obviously those aircrafts were made to have two or three cabins. Why would a company (even if owned by a government) purchase/lease aircrafts without the standards configuration by the suppliers (boeing, etc) or for that matter, have it change?! Why would TG not want to compete in this global market with product options? While not all F seats may be revenue-ed, it's there to offer "options" for both paying pax and (in more modern time) compete in loyalty program marketing. An international airline can't be in this market and survive without biz and first product obviously. TG has a reputation for best in class service and while this may no longer be true across all surveys platform, the airline objective is to achieve and defend this status years after years, even with different management in different eras. It’s a pride of the airline. TG is known for this. I mean, do you even know that TG, from its beginning, was not even a 100% Thailand owned company? It was owned by SAS! The international portion of the airline was SAS partly owned and operated. The domestic portion was a Thai wholly owned and operated. Because of the nation identity and an aim for a national flagship carrier, the government at the time seeked and successfully merged the “THAI” and “Thai Airways” into Thai Airways International and remain in this name since. Do you think SAS management in the 60’s care too much about exclusive service for Thai royal family on its European routes in the bulkhead of the aircrafts? An international company of this size surely has marketing needs and plans in place for its aircrafts and products, even if owned by the government. But one thing is true per Lucky’s post, TG first class seats certainly don’t generate profit as much as it can be. But it’s also there as a marketing tactic so pax in Y or J revenue tixs can either use loyalty points or pay to upgrade. One way or another, a revenue is being raised and “loyal” customers continue to pay Y or J fares to travel/accumulate loyalty points/miles to qualify for upgrades. It’s only become more of a “steal” when TG joined *A when other airlines loyalty program customers can get in with the respective *A miles/points.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published