United Airlines’ JFK Return Is Imminent: What’s The Strategy, Though?

We know that United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby thinks that one of the carrier’s biggest mistakes in the past was pulling out of New York Kennedy Airport (JFK). He’s committed to changing that, and the airline still seems to think that it’s on track to return to the airport in 2027.

A lot has changed since this was initially a big topic of conversation, including United seemingly no longer being interested in any sort of merger with JetBlue. So with United potentially within a year of returning to JFK, I’d like to talk a bit more about what that could look like, as I’m still not sure I fully understand the strategy.

Why United left JFK, and how the airline plans to return

United obviously has a huge hub at Newark Liberty Airport (EWR), and different airline executives have different takes as to the overlap in demand between Newark and Kennedy.

Through late 2015, United had a relatively small presence at JFK, with a majority of the service consisting of premium transcontinental flights to Los Angeles (LAX) and San Francisco (SFO), with a product that was branded as p.s. The airline operated these flights with specially configured, three cabin Boeing 757-200s.

However, in late 2015, the airline made the decision to end service at JFK, and instead consolidate flights at EWR. The airline was reportedly losing money on these flights, and just couldn’t compete with American and Delta, which both had major hubs there.

Shortly after that decision was made, Kirby joined United, before eventually being appointed CEO. For as long as he has been at United, Kirby has felt that leaving JFK was one of the carrier’s biggest strategic blunders. In 2021, United briefly returned to JFK, operating transcon routes with Boeing 767-300ERs. However, the airline pulled out by 2022, as it couldn’t get permanent slots, and couldn’t scale service in a way that made sense.

United Airlines Boeing 767 widebody jet parked at an airport gate
United returned to JFK in 2021, but it didn’t last long

Ever since, United has been determined to return to JFK. We know that United wants up to 20 daily slot pairs at the airport, to offer very frequent coast-to-coast service. So, where do things stand? As flagged by JonNYC, United Chief Commercial Officer Andrew Nocella recently went on record to confirm that United is on track to return to JFK in 2027, which is just around the corner.

So, how will United secure the slots needed for service?

  • We know that JetBlue and United have their Blue Sky partnership, and that includes the possibility of JetBlue giving United up to seven daily slot pairs at JFK as early as 2027 (with “up to” and “as early as” being the key terms here)
  • United is reportedly exploring opportunities to acquire slot pairs from low margin carriers that aren’t doing well at JFK; however, those are unlikely to be very lucrative in terms of the timing of flights
JetBlue Airbus A321 painted in the airline's new livery
United is planning to get some slot pairs from JetBlue

I still have a hard time envisioning United’s JFK return

United management is generally on top of things when it comes to strategy, and I can make sense of most things. However, I still struggle to fully rationalize the plans for returning to JFK. That’s not to say it doesn’t make sense, or that I’m right, but here’s how I think through this:

  • I struggle to see how JetBlue is getting sufficient upside from its partnership with United that it thinks it makes sense to give or trade seven slot pairs with United, just so that United can compete directly in two of JetBlue’s highest revenue markets
  • Even if United managed to secure 20 daily slot pairs for premium transcontinental routes, how will the airline do that without hemorrhaging money in the market? The airline is at a disadvantage in terms of customer loyalty at JFK, has more limited connecting traffic on the JFK side, etc. (though admittedly it’s better positioned on the West Coast)
  • I have to imagine that a major incentive with a return to JFK is being able to compete for Asia-bound traffic via the SFO hub, so the route could be used to fill connecting transpacific flights
  • How will United compete with the ground experience offered by competitors, when you have Delta offering a dedicated Delta One check-in facility, Delta One Lounge, etc.?

On the surface, entering a market as a fourth place player, with limited opportunity to grow, little connectivity on the JFK side, and limited ability to have a great ground experience, seems like it could create a challenge.

Seating and dining area inside the Delta One Lounge at New York JFK airport
How is United supposed to compete with the Delta ground experience?

Bottom line

United Airlines executives still insist the airline will return to JFK in 2027. This seems to involve getting some number of slots from JetBlue (as part of their partnership), and then possibly acquiring slots from some other carriers. It’s still not entirely clear how this will play out, though last we heard, the goal is to get 20 slot pairs, and aggressively fly to LAX and SFO.

I know Kirby thinks it was a big mistake to leave JFK, though I remain a bit confused by how the airline offering high frequency service from JFK to the West Coast, when the markets are already served by three large carriers, will be lucrative.

How do you see United’s JFK strategy playing out?

Conversations (9)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Pedro Guest

But what about the poor baggage handling metrics?

0
‼ 0
747-400 Platinum

I am a management consultant who worked on the project ("Revenue Squared") that recommended abandoning JFK and focusing premium transcon flying on EWR (among many other initiatives). It was a good recommendation, and I completely agree with Ben that their return still doesn't make sense. They have no flow traffic there and are at a major disadvantage compared to AA, DL, and B6 on these hyper competitive transcon routes. Their loyal flyers are all at EWR, so I guess they are targeting the SFO/LAX-origin passengers headed to New York, who Kirby believes prefer JFK over EWR, because it is more prestigious (or something?). I just have a hard time believing that there are that many people who care much about JFK over EWR, particularly since it is a longer drive from the places in Manhattan where most of the high-yielding pax are going.

0
‼ 0
Tim Dunn Diamond

you can be certain that UA execs will keep saying they have a plan to re-enter JFK - until 2027 passes and they aren't there. no rational person can explain why B6 would transfer slots to UA so that UA can compete on B6' best routes - perhaps the only ones that make money, and AA and DL have zero reason to give UA an inch - and DL has already shown its hand in scheduling EWR-LAX which will certainly be the first of far more routes that DL can start. none of the big 4 are willing to give up anything. Adding anything has to be part of a strategy that is so much bigger than a single airport and also where there is no way that the "attacked carrier" can respond. That is exactly the strategy behind DL's TPAC and west coast expansion. DL is much healthier financially than UA, has larger, far more efficient and capable aircraft, and has non-airline advantages including Amex and the refinery which UA simply can't match. There is no way that UA can succeed at re-entering JFK without paying a far higher price from both AA and DL -and probably B6 - than UA can gain. but let's also be clear that Kirby has promised and tried alot and failed at even more - including and esp. EWR and ORD

0
‼ 0
shoeguy Guest

Hi Lucky, By the time UA exited JFK in 2015, the "ps" service was aboard two-class cabin aircraft featuring what was then United's pre-Polaris business class cabin, the bones of which remain on the 757-200s still flying with UA, and Economy (with several rows of extra legroom seats). The original ps format was First Class, Business Class, with that extraordinary row 9 at the exits which had unlimited legroom, and the back of the aircraft (Economy) was all Economy Plus (extra legroom).

0
‼ 0
splane21 Platinum

Maybe they won’t have loyalty in JFK but what about the United loyalists in SFO and LAX who need to fly to JFK. They are two separate markets. Additionally I’m sure there are United loyalists in Manhattan that would fly from EWR or JFK to help fill flights

1
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published