Etihad Rumored To Be Canceling Plane Orders As Part Of Restructuring

Among the “big three” Gulf carriers, Etihad seems to be struggling the most. That’s a combination of their failed investments in other airlines, their lack of strategy in building a profitable route network, and seemingly also largely the government somewhat cutting them off and telling them to stop losing money.

Meanwhile Emirates continues to do well (even though they’re parking some planes due to a pilot shortage), and Qatar continues to have the full backing of their government, despite losing a significant amount of money.

Etihad has been trying to cut costs, which has included changing their investments in other airlines (they cut off airberlin and Alitalia, Air Seychelles is restructuring, and Air Serbia is rumored to be next), and also has included cutting costs that impact the Etihad passenger experience.

It looks like their next cost cutting move won’t just be eliminating pajamas from business class, or getting rid of the shave salon from their first class lounge, but something much bigger. Reuters reports that Etihad is considering canceling some of the planes they have on order. The airline has a huge number of planes on order — they presently have 110 planes in their fleet, and 165 planes on order. These orders include:

  • 26 Airbus A321neos
  • 40 Airbus A350-900s
  • 22 Airbus A350-1000s
  • 8 Boeing 777-8s
  • 17 Boeing 777-9s
  • 22 Boeing 787-9s
  • 30 Boeing 787-10s


Etihad has 22 more Boeing 787-9s on order

As you can see, their plane orders are all over the place. Etihad placed most of these orders back in 2013, when they were pursuing an aggressive expansion strategy to keep pace with Emirates and Qatar. After a company-wide review, they’re now going for a different strategy, which seems to be to cut their way into profitability (or at least out of losses).

We don’t yet know the details of these changes, though sources familiar with the matter say that Etihad could be canceling a big percentage of the planes they have on order.

We’ll have to wait and see how this develops. Of course I don’t know exactly what kind of agreements they struck with Airbus and Boeing. Which planes Etihad decides to keep could be a function of which contracts they can most easily and inexpensively get out of, and also based on what kind of deals they got to begin with. My initial inclination is that:

  • They’ll keep the A321neo order, since it’s a lower capacity plane with good operating costs, which it seems like they could use
  • They clearly ordered too many widebody jets for an airline that doesn’t want to continue to grow at a fast pace; so between the 777, 787, and A350, I’d guess that they may very well cancel one or two of these plane types

Are you surprised to see Etihad considering canceling orders? Which orders do you think they’ll cancel?

Conversations (37)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Simon Diamond

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-etihad-airways-boeing-exclusive/exclusive-etihad-airways-in-talks-to-cancel-defer-boeing-777x-orders-sources-idUSKBN1J92FF

0
‼ 0
RB Guest

Regrettably the worst business decision Etihad made was hiring James Hogan. His record with Gulf Air involved adding lots of bling but little substance. Inefficient fleet, lack of proper route planning and seemingly using the airline to create an illusion of his own success and abilities. Left Gulf Air on its knees and was reincarnated as CEO of Etihad will where he brought lots of innovation but little substance and a lack of focus on the bottom line. Whilst an “equity alliance” might sound like a great concept, it is nothing new. IAG clearly have an “equity alliance” but have formed this be bringing together profitable airlines, not basket cases. Ditto for Lufthansa Group. He seemed to forget the basics of running an airline. Most passengers cannot afford a luxurious first class studio or the residence. Training numerous butlers to service the residence. Creating an airline with an inefficient fleet and inconsistent products. Spending loads of money on advertisements starring Nicole Kidman plus many other expensive sponsorships. Basically, the Gulf Air approach with a far greater amount of money to waste.

0
‼ 0
JPT Guest

If airline CEO's are stupid and rely on even more stupid consulting firms, such as McKinsey, then one cannot be surprised that things go wrong! History had show it very clearly with the Swissair bankruptcy: buying minority stakes in non or under performing airlines. It just does not work! Guess the EY senior management should have thought and analysed ways to expand by themselves!

0
‼ 0
Luis R. Guest

Oh Lord. I agree with @Myles in the fact that Etihad had an impact on our lives.Its always sad to see the degree of deterioration of an airline after re-structuring and cost cutting measures. I just wish they find a way to turn this situation as quickly as possible but if we take into account that before 2011 Ey never turned a profit and it was created more like a vanity project, the future just looks grim for them. EY deserves credit for being an innovator, especially when in comes to cabins. Hope they can still be in business in the future so they continue to innovate.

0
‼ 0
emercycrite Guest

Of COURSE it’s Hogan’s fault. He was the CEO: the buck stops with him. The CEO is ultimately responsible for the steerage of the company, and under Hogan’s stewardship it was all downhill after the “Flying Reimagined”/A380 campaign. The partner alliance he tried to build was a colossal miscalculation.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published