Etihad Reports Massive $1.28 Billion Loss For 2018

Etihad Airways has just reported their 2018 results, and… they’re really, really bad. The press release about these results is titled “Etihad Airways Improves Core Performance in 2018 a Transformation Continues.” Well, that’s one way to look at it.

Etihad announced a loss of 1.28 billion USD on a total of 5.86 billion USD of revenue. As a point of comparison, in 2017 the airline reported a loss of 1.52 billion USD on a total of 6.0 billion USD of revenue. Emirates has revealed their financial results for the past financial year, ending March 31, 2019. Emirates did much better than Etihad.

Etihad began a five year transformation plan in 2017, when they cut off some of the airlines they had invested in that they realized they’d never be able to turn around. It seems the government of Abu Dhabi was no longer happy just flushing money down the drain, and actually wanted to make a more sustainable airline.


A couple of years ago Etihad stopped pouring money into Alitalia

So as much as their 2018 results are horrible, in fairness, they are significantly better than their 2017 results. Etihad says they’ve improved their core operating performance despite “challenging market conditions and effects of an increase in fuel prices.”

Some interesting stats:

  • In 2018 Etihad carried 17.8 million passengers with a 76.4% load factor (in 2017 they carried 18.6 million passengers with a 78.5% load factor)
  • Their capacity decreased by 4% in 2018 (based on available seat kilometers)
  • The airline increased yields by 4%, driven by capacity discipline, network and fleet optimization, and growing market share in premium and point-to-point markets
  • The airline reduced costs by 416 million USD to 6.9 billion USD, compared to 7.3 billion USD in 2017
  • Direct operating costs were reduced by 226 million USD, or 3.6% (bye bye pajamas, lounge spas, etc.)
  • Administration and general expenses declined by 190 million USD, or 19%


Etihad reported a load factor of 76.4% in 2018

As Etihad Group CEO Tony Douglas describes it:

“In 2018, we continued to forge ahead with our transformation journey by streamlining our cost base, improving our cash-flow and strengthening our balance sheet.

Our transformation is instilling a renewed sense of confidence in our customers, our partners and our people. As a major enabler of commerce and tourism to and from Abu Dhabi, we are intrinsically linked to the continued success of the emirate.”

A few other interesting things to note about 2018:

  • The airline ended unprofitable routes to Tehran, Jaipur, Entebbe, Dallas, Ho Chi Minh City, Dhaka, Dar es Salaam, Edinburgh, and Perth
  • The airline took delivery of eight new planes, including three 787-9s, four 787-10s, and one 777-200 freighter
  • The airline says that they’ve had a “particular focus on inflight retail offering, unbundling of services and fares, and installation of new seating products”

Etihad took delivery of seven 787s in 2018

Bottom line

Losses of 1.28 billion USD on a total of 5.86 billion USD in revenue are really rough, if you ask me. Still, it represents a significant improvement over the past two years — in 2017 the airline lost 1.52 billion USD, and in 2016 the airline lost 1.95 billion USD. That’s a total of 4.75 billion USD in losses over the past three years.

The most concerning thing is at this point they can’t blame the losses on airberlin, Alitalia, etc. They’ve divested from many of these failed airlines. They’ve also done a huge amount of cost cutting in 2018, and passengers have noticed.

It’s not like Etihad’s losses are just a few percent of their revenue. This past year their losses were equivalent to 22% of their revenue. No matter how you slice it, that’s really, really rough.

The airline has 111 planes, so if you take their losses and divide them by the number of planes, each plane in their fleet loses the airline an average of $32,000 per day. Let me note that I realize this is a completely oversimplified (and actually worthless) metric, though I think it at least helps demonstrate the scale of their losses.


Etihad A330

We know that Etihad is undoing their growth planes from the past by canceling aircraft orders, but at this point I question how much more they can do to really turn around their results.

Conversations (31)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Kent Member

Love the comparison of the ME3 vs the US3 on cost structures although they belong in two altogether different spaces. The US3 survive due to a large domestic market, supported by the poor alternative modes of transit been major cities in part due to heavy lobbying by the US3 on ensuring states are not incentivized to invest in things like super fast rail connectivity. That could be considered an indirect subsidy by many.

0
‼ 0
EJ Guest

I flown with Emirates & Qatar multiple times - but Etihad has always been on my to-do-list. Year after year I feel this weird pressure increasing... that I need to get onboard before company goes down, before ME3 becomes ME2. It may not be imminent, but I'd say its a strange way to choose your flight: experience it before company goes to bankruptcy :D

0
‼ 0
mark3 Guest

Ditto Ditto Ditto, ChrisC: perhaps if they stopped sponsoring football and other sporting clubs and venues they would have have reduced the loses. Do any of these sponsorships ever lead to increased passenger flows? Are their ex-Man flights packed with Man City supporters? I certainly won’t fly with an airline because they happened to have sponsored something. I want to fly with them because of destinations, service offered and price.

0
‼ 0
John Member

With results like this the big three US airlines aren't totally off base in saying at least Etihad is heavily subsidized. No private investor would put up with this. The company would have been in bankruptcy many times over by now with results like this, and probably liquidated rather than restructured since they just don't have a viable operation or even anything close to one -- even with no debt, they can't make money. That's different than US airlines that went through bankruptcy due to too much debt. Fundamentally the US airlines have a margin on their operations so they are sustainable if debt levels are brought under control. But this just isn't sustainable with anything other than massive government subsidies.

0
‼ 0
Mark Guest

Etihad employed management who made Gulf Air into a shambles (before them it was a reasonable airline) - what were the Government thinking in the first place . It was bound to end in the present mess.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published