Amsterdam Schiphol’s Innovative New Taxibot

Before COVID-19 changed the world, one of the biggest topics in the airline industry was the environment, and ways the industry can reduce emissions, including carbon offset schemes.

While it’s no longer the focal point for the industry, Amsterdam Schiphol Airport is moving forward with testing new technology that has the potential to reduce emissions.

Areas where aviation can become more efficient

There are the obvious ways that airlines can become more efficient, like flying more fuel efficient planes, cramming more seats onto planes (in terms of emissions per passenger, assuming they can keep flights full), offsetting flights, and more.

However, there are some other opportunities for emissions to be reduced that don’t involve carbon offsets or more efficient planes:

  • There’s talk of making air traffic control more efficient, meaning planes have to make fewer turns, do less holding, etc.
  • There’s talk about the wasteful emissions while planes are on the ground; we’ve all been in situations where we’re waiting nearly an hour for takeoff with the engines running, so could we see a system whereby planes only taxi to the runway when they’re ready to go?

The issue with all of these suggestions is that there’s some tradeoff between emissions and efficiency. With airports and airspace already so congested (pre-coronavirus), it’s tough to implement some of these measures without reducing planes in the sky.

Amsterdam tests new “taxibot”

Here’s a fascinating innovation that I wouldn’t be surprised to eventually see on a widespread basis. This spring Amsterdam Schiphol Airport is testing a new “taxibot,” as it’s called.

Generally you have tugs that push planes back from gates. Once the plane is pushed back the tug disconnects, and then the plane taxies to the runway using its engines.

With this new taxibot concept:

  • A tractor would transport planes to and from the runway, so that they can keep their engines off for as long as possible, instead using the power of the tractor
  • This would reduce overall fuel burn on the ground by 50-85%, resulting in reduced emissions
  • The taxibot can turn on its axis with four wheel steering and drive sideways, so it can maneuver easily
  • The taxibot can maintain normal taxiing speeds of up to 50km/hr

For now this is in the testing phase in order to determine safety and operational feasibility, though they’re hoping to eventually roll this out on a widespread basis.

Here’s a video of the new taxibot:

Bottom line

There are so many opportunities for planes to reduce emissions on the ground, so it’s great to see a concept like this being seriously tested. The big question is whether this is operationally feasible, and can be done without making the flow of traffic significantly less efficient.

I’ll be curious to see what they determine based on the testing phase…

Conversations (22)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Noah Bowie Guest

Heathrow Terminal 5 has had robotic tugs for years now. They don't taxi the plane to the runway but they're far more efficient than regular tugs especially because there is one for each stand and they recharge at the stand as well.

0
‼ 0
erick smith Guest

This is a total pipedream, and not to mention it was tried and proposed 15 years ago with no luck. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6203636.stm The potential savings of a couple hundred $ of kerosene per flight have not been shown to be worth the risk of having an aircraft encounter problems during the taxi, the complication of how the robots operate, and the cost of developing the robots (plus production costs). Nice idea, but will not fly practically...

0
‼ 0
Jay C Guest

So after the tug drops off the aircraft, than what? Are they going to than drive back to the ramp area empty dodging all the other aircraft? Like another poster said. Looks good on paper.

0
‼ 0
docntx Guest

@Polarbear I thought we see planes pulled from the nose gear to parking spots or hangars all the time.

0
‼ 0
Bubba Guest

Well, is there a reason why you can't start em up while on the tug? N1 below 40 percent you're not generating much thrust. At AMS you could run off the APU until Victor and still have plenty of time to crank em before the Polderbaan. Save a good 20 minutes of taxiing.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published