Alaska Airlines To Place Big Aircraft Order In 2020

Alaska Airlines faces a big fleet decision this year, which is complicated even further by the carrier’s longstanding loyalty to Boeing.

Alaska Airlines to order new planes in 2020

During Alaska Airlines’ fourth quarter 2019 earnings call earlier this week, the airline revealed a major focus for 2020, which is fleet renewal.

Alaska Airlines has 61 Airbus A319s and A320s that they acquired through the Virgin America merger, and the plan is to replace these with more “efficient” (aka larger) planes.

Alaska plans to order either 737 MAX aircraft (the -9s or -10s) or the Airbus A321neo. This would give them the ability to generate more revenue while lowering unit costs.

As Alaska’s SVP of Fleet, Finance, and Alliances describes the situation:

The economics of up gauging over the next several years are compelling and we are looking forward to finalizing plans to do this as one of our main 2020 objectives. The ultimate timing of a fleet transition will be balanced to smooth incremental training costs, especially of moving to a single fleet and will also be done in a manner that ensures we can meet our free cash flow and capital return goals.

Alaska’s current Airbus fleet

Historically Alaska has been an all Boeing airline. Heck, their Boeing planes even have “Proudly All Boeing” written underneath the cockpit windows, even though it hasn’t been accurate for years.

Alaska Airlines has over 160 Boeing 737 aircraft, split between the -700s, -800s, and -900s. On top of that, the airline has 30 Boeing 737 MAX 9 aircraft on order, though for obvious reasons the timeline for those has been pushed back.

Alaska’s Airbus fleet was acquired completely through their takeover of Virgin America. Alaska has:

  • 10 Airbus A319s, which are an average of 12 years old
  • 51 Airbus A320s, which are an average of nine years old
  • 10 Airbus A321neos, which are an average of under two years old, and which the airline doesn’t plan on retiring anytime soon; after all, they’re considering ordering more of these

Which plane makes the most sense for Alaska?

As I see it, there are a few major factors at play here…

Alaska supporting their “hometown” business

Before Alaska acquired Virgin America, it was completely unthinkable that the airline would ever order Airbus planes. Alaska Airlines is based in Seattle, and has been fiercely loyal to Boeing. Heck, there’s something about Seattle’s culture in general that’s all about supporting local businesses, and I’d say this is an extension of that.

Alaska 737 (with “Proudly All Boeing” written underneath cockpit windows

The double edged sword of fleet simplification

In the past the concept of fleet commonality was something airlines strived for. A simple fleet is great in terms of training costs, maintenance, scheduling, etc. However, if there’s one thing we’ve learned from the airline industry in the past couple of years, it’s that this is a double edged sword.

Take Norwegian as an example. They focused exclusively on the 787-9 and 737 MAX 8 — the 737 MAX 8 is grounded, and the 787-9 has been having huge issues with Rolls Royce engines.

Norwegian’s 737 MAX 8s have caused huge headaches for the airline

Alaska will have Airbus planes no matter what

It’s one thing if Alaska could benefit from operating just Boeing 737 aircraft with this adjustment, though the reality is that no matter what, the airline is keeping at least 10 Airbus A321neo aircraft. Therefore there aren’t any real synergies to be had in ordering the 737 over the A321, since they’ll have both planes in their fleet regardless.

Virgin America had ordered the A321neos

My guess of what will happen

While there’s no denying that Boeing’s reputation has taken a hit with the 737 MAX issues, I still suspect Alaska will choose Boeing for their fleet renewal. Unless Airbus somehow offers them a much better deal, I feel like Boeing has the upper hand here.

For what it’s worth, it’s telling that the A321neo is even seriously being considered. Back in 2017, Alaska Airlines’ CEO indicated that the airline planned to be all Boeing long term, saying the following (in reference to Airbus planes):

“If I were to guess, they won’t be in the fleet permanently. It will take some time to get a transition done.”

Lastly, I do think it’s interesting how Alaska is going to extremes with capacity. They obviously have their regional operation, where they operate 76 seat planes. But it seems that all of their future fleet planning involves ~200 seat planes, since they have lower unit costs. It doesn’t appear that Alaska is even consider a plane like the Airbus A220.

What plane do you think Alaska will choose, and which do you want to see them choose?

Conversations (57)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Brock B Guest

@stuart ...You sir are a damn fool... Alaska is not going anywhere anytime soon... JetBlue is more focused on the east coast area (and LA)... They lost in the acquisition of Virgin America to Alaska... That was a key victory they would have needed in order to think about acquiring Alaska. JetBlue doesn’t really have much beef with Alaska at the moment (unless if it’s in LAX or JFK) but other than that, Delta is more of a threat to Alaska in terms of business at the moment, who they’ve comfortably been keeping at bay for years now... Everyone thinks that Alaska is in a precarious situation when in fact they are not, they’re the largest domestic airline on the United States west coast, they’ve been operating through the pandemic with little incident (even adding routes while other airlines are closing them)... Also the Max grounding has been lifted in both Europe and the United States... I agree with what people have been saying about a large order of Max 10’s for Alaska, that would really make a bunch of other airlines (like JetBlue) start to shake in their boots. Also, it doesn’t matter if Boeing is HQ’d in Chicago, Boeing was born here, Boeing is widely synonymous with big Seattle businesses, that never really changed even when they left... The Everett and Renton facilities are still active, BOEING field is still active, you even have the Boeing museums here. They sponsor and support our local sports (you don’t see Boeing sponsoring the Chicago Bears now, so you?) Boeing might as well have never left... I should also add that airlines trust the assembly line in Everett for the 787 more than they do in South Carolina because of better production quality with more aerospace industry professionals here in the Northwest... smh... ye of little faith... don’t ever count out Alaska or Boeing.

0
‼ 0
Kim Guest

If Alaska goes away from Boeing aircraft, then I will be choosing a new airline for my weekly travel. I have lived in The Seattle for decades and it is homegrown all they way. If Alaska is not going to support the local economy and send their money overseas, then I have no need to support Alaska with my continued business.

0
‼ 0
Cameron S Guest

Recently flew AS: 737-800 6 hr. flight LAX to Ft. Lauderdale. So uncomfortable are the slimline seats that by hour 3 the bathroom line is 20 people long and the beverage cart can't move anywhere. The wider A321 is the obvious choice for transcontinental flights.

0
‼ 0
Mark Guest

The longer the Max grounding goes on, the less confidence the public will have. Imagine the havoc this has caused and now a decision has to be made about fleet expansion. So you are a small business owner and you buy 5 vans and then you are told that those vans are not safe and you can’t legally drive them, you are stuck meeting your needs with the other vans you have, a year goes by no change, the vans are in your lot collecting dust, you get your Trump tax cut and the economy is booming and you have some extra cash, you really think you will buy more of the same or perhaps you’ll go with the vans that are still in the road. Besides in this case the 321 is just that much wider and more comfortable and therefore a great addition to the fleet for longer flights

0
‼ 0
TomSeattle Guest

SeaFlyGuy!!! Just what I thought. The 787 series would bring the level of passenger service up hugely!!! The Transcon and Hawaii would be PERFECT routes. First would really mean something. The 787 would open new routes too!!!

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published