Airbus Improves A220 Range, But Does It Matter?

The Airbus A220 (formerly known as the Bombardier CSeries, though in the meantime Bombardier has sold their whole stake) has proven to be incredibly popular with both airlines and passengers. Airlines have already ordered 530 of these planes, and Airbus hopes the order book will increase significantly over time.

There’s a lot to love about the A220, regardless of whether you’re an airline or a passenger.

From the perspective of airlines:

  • The plane fills a gap that isn’t otherwise being served, as the two variants of the A220 have between 100 and 150 seats, give or take; this makes the plane larger than regional jets, but smaller than the A320 and 737
  • The A220 is incredibly fuel efficient, at least 20% more fuel efficient than previous planes serving that market
  • The plane has incredible range, and can fly 3,000+ miles nonstop, making it versatile

airBaltic A220-300

From a passenger’s perspective there’s also a lot to love about the plane:

  • The plane has many of the comforts you’ll find on an A350 or 787, while still being a narrow body
  • The A220 is in a 2-3 configuration, so there’s only one middle seat in each row
  • The A220 has a quiet and modern cabin

Here’s my experience flying Delta’s A220 first class, to give you a sense of what it’s like to fly on the plane.

Delta A220-100 cabin

Airbus announces A220 range improvement

Airbus is making big improvements to this plane without even technically relaunching it. Airbus has announced that the A220 will be offering increased range starting in the second half of 2020.

Essentially Airbus is able to increase the maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) of the A220 by 2,268kg. This is being achieved by taking advantage of existing structural and systems margins, and increasing existing fuel volume capacity.

With this change:

  • The A220-100 will have a maximum range of 3,400nm
  • The A220-300 will have a maximum range of 3,350nm

For both the A220-100 and A220-300, the maximum range of the plane is being increased by about 450nm.

As Airbus’ Chief Commercial Officer describes it:

“In true Airbus tradition we improve our products constantly. This new MTOW will allow operators to reach markets which today cannot be served by other small single-aisle aircraft types.”

What routes does the A220’s increased range open up?

Obviously Airbus hopes that this increased range will result in more orders for the plane. Airbus points out that this increased range will allow airlines to operate new routes from Western Europe to the Middle East, or from Southeast Asia to Australia.

We’ve also heard quite a bit about the possibility of airlines using the A220 for transatlantic operations. With the previous range of the plane, operating transatlantic flights was right at the margins, while now it could easily be done.

For example, take the 3,350nm range on the A220-300 (which is the shorter range of the two planes). With that increased range all kinds of routes are easily possible from the US East Coast to Western Europe (this map shows a 3,350nm range from Boston).

Yet interestingly in Airbus’ press release they talk about the potential to fly from Southeast Asia to Australia, and the potential to fly from Western Europe to the Middle East.

Why aren’t transatlantic flights mentioned? Because it seems the demand just isn’t there. Airlines are already using planes like the A321 and 737 for transatlantic flights, and those are considered to be low capacity planes for transatlantic flights. So I guess operating even smaller planes has limited appeal.

Bottom line

Airbus improving the range on the A220 even further is quite impressive. In fairness, though, the plane already offered really good range.

While the A220 is a fantastic plane, and while there are a lot of “long and thin” routes out there, I do think demand for operating these planes on 3,500+ mile flights is fairly limited.

I’ll be curious to see just how many airlines take advantage of the A220’s incredible new range.

What do you think — is there demand for airlines to operate 3,500+ mile flights with 100-150 seat planes, or do the A320/737 family aircraft have that covered?

Conversations (43)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Chris Guest

I fly on Delta’s A220 every month Boston to Cincinnati and for such a new plane there are lots of maintenance issues. Sometimes software (they need to reboot the system the flight attendants use for the cabin temp, safety briefings, etc), today a “bad engine.” I’d guess that about 25% of flights have some issue.

0
‼ 0
Parker West Guest

Before we get too euphoric about the C100, C300, A220 let’s examine the reason Bombardier was willing to hand it over to Airbus, they couldn’t make money on the project. Despite a C$ 1Billion hand out from the Canadian government along with C$ 1Billion from Quebec Bombardier couldn’t see any potential for a profit. Airbus exec’s have been trashing the aircraft for the last 10 years and now it’s their baby obtained without exchanging a single dollar or Euro. It’s a $20 million aircraft that costs $30 million to break even, sure all new aircraft are sold at a loss for a few years before they become profitable but this is ridicules. It also makes the A319neo redundant. Did Airbus obtain the A220 to kill it off? We’ll see.

0
‼ 0
Forgedias Guest

"Delta are phasing out the MD 80/90 for the A220. But they have had problems with a lot of the sensors. Plus they make this loud whale like sound." That whale like sound is the sound of the engines spooling up. Only happens when the plane takes off. Its a Vulcan sound that some jet engines make and to me its a sweet noise.

0
‼ 0
Bob Loblaw Guest

Moxy Airline business model is based exclusively on serving the "long and thin" routes. So yes, the extra range is a big win. I don't buy into the belief that there is no interest for the A220 on transatlantic routes.

0
‼ 0
albi Guest

errata: the A220-300 is the "longer" variant of the two.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published