United’s “Historic” Announcement: More International Flights From SFO

Last night I wrote about how United revealed that Oscar Munoz would be making a “historic” announcement today. This was described as a “historic package of new and expanded international routes,” and suffice to say that it led to lots of speculation as to what the additions could be. Well, the wait is over, and we now know.

I’d say it’s not not exciting, but it doesn’t quite live up to the “historic” hype, in my opinion.

United announces big international expansion from SFO

San Francisco is already a massive hub for United, as the airline operates dozens of longhaul flights from there. This “historic” announcement is that United will be adding extra routes from San Francisco in 2019, including to:

  • Melbourne, Australia (3x weekly)
  • New Delhi, India (daily)
  • Toronto, Canada (twice daily)
  • Amsterdam, Netherlands (daily)
  • Seoul Incheon (for a second daily frequency)
  • Auckland and Tahiti (year-round, rather than seasonally)

Okay, truth be told, this is actually sort of anti-climactic. The way I see it:

  • The San Francisco to Delhi route is the only really exciting addition here
  • United already flies to Melbourne, but only out of Los Angeles; it’s nice to have an extra nonstop, but it’s not exactly groundbreaking
  • United already announced flights to Amsterdam
  • United already flies to Auckland and Tahiti, just not year-round
  • United already flies to Seoul Incheon, they’re just adding an additional daily frequency
  • United doesn’t fly from San Francisco to Toronto, but the market is already pretty well served by their partner, Air Canada

So yeah, there you have it. No doubt their growth out of SFO over the past few years has been extremely impressive. However, I’d hardly call this particular announcement “historic.”

Details of the new routes

Here’s a chart showing when the schedules and aircraft type for the new routes:

And here’s a chart showing the service that’s being made year-round:

Bottom line

United is adding four new routes, one of which has previously been announced, and all of which are to destinations they already fly to from other hubs. Then they announced additional frequencies on three routes.

What do you make of United’s SFO expansion?

(Tip of the hat to @e_russell)

Conversations (73)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Don Guest

WHEN??? Will a airline fly non-stop to Berlin??????

0
‼ 0
Karan New Member

https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-new-united-airlines-flights-1220-story.html

0
‼ 0
Prabuddha Guest

@Mike Hines The Air India flight is already RTW. It flies Del-SFO over the pacific to take advantage of tailwinds (Incidentally this is the longest flight in the world but doesnt show up on most lists as the lists use the over the pole GC distance) and the SFO-DEL is flown over the pole. Even though the Pacific route is actually longer due to tail winds it takes less time and fuel. UA will probably fly the same route. The AI flight is very expensive sometimes twice as expensive as a 1 stop Cathay or Emirates as its the only nonstop. Now with UA in the picture the fares might moderate.

0
‼ 0
Will Member

@Veeejay It doesn't. In all reality the only route that would have an economical advantage for United would be from SFO-BKK or SFO-CAN

0
‼ 0
DavidO New Member

@Travis, agreed. If I was traveling primarily trans-Pacific and had those kind of options I’m sure I’d have a very different opinion. I haven’t noticed the cabin maintenance issues, but that’s most likely due to the pre-flight cocktails in the Polaris lounge being on point. They’re also pouring The Prisoner red wine in there, which is one of the higher value red wines I’ve seen in a J lounge. A few years ago I would’ve avoided United like the plague for a long haul, but now at least it’s in the mix if it’s a route with the new seats. Step by step I suppose.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published