Will Singapore Airlines Shrink Into A Regional Carrier?

The airline industry has been shaken up a lot in the past decade or so.

What has been shaking up the airline industry

While the industry as a whole isn’t historically especially profitable (especially when you consider the amount of capital investment required to run an airline), there have been two trends that have really shaken up the industry:

  • The emergence of the “big three” Middle Eastern carriers, which have really started to compete globally, by offering one stop service between all kinds of city pairs outside their “region.” They’ve stolen significant market share from the network/national carriers.
  • The continued growth of low cost carriers, which have taken up a lot of short-haul market share, and in some cases, even longhaul market share. They’ve driven down fares and decreased yields for the network/national carriers.

Emirates-A380-First-Class-01

Combine those two factors, and you’ll quickly see why so many major airlines — Air France, British Airways, Qantas, etc.– have gone through major financial turmoil over the past decade or so.

Singapore Airlines is in trouble

I think many of us assume that Singapore Airlines is doing reasonably well. They are turning mild profits, which aren’t amazing, but are better than losses.

Singapore-A380

But the forecast they delivered to investors is bad. Via Yahoo Finance:

According to Mohshin Aziz, Associate Director of Equity Markets (Research) at Maybank Investment Bank, SIA’s management warned that analysts are “more optimistic than the company is” when it comes to the flag carrier’s future prospects.

“Our main takeaway from the briefing is that SIA’s future is grim if it doesn’t change the way it do business. The days of Singapore and SIA being the long-haul hub for the ASEAN region is over,” Aziz said.

How poorly is Singapore Airlines doing in some markets?

In particular, he highlighted that SIA’s long-haul routes have been almost consistently loss-making since FY09 as its competitors have refined their strategy and successfully established themselves into SIA’s markets.

Wow!!! Almost all of Singapore’s longhaul routes have been losing money for about six years. That’s insane.

What’s the cause of the problem? Exactly what’s impacting other major carriers as well — a combination of low cost carriers and the big Middle Eastern carriers:

“Regional peers have upped their game and encroached into SIA’s markets whilst the middle-eastern carriers continues to drink up SIA’s milkshake. Long-haul flights are in structural decline, short and medium haul is where the money is,” he noted.

Will Singapore go the way of Malaysia?

Malaysia Airlines was already in a terrible financial situation before their two tragic accidents last year. But they have a new CEO, Christoph Mueller, who is trying to turn the airline around. And he seems to have “diagnosed” the situation very similarly to Singapore Airlines’ management.

Mueller wants to shrink the airline hugely and turn Malaysia into more of a regional carrier, since that’s where the money is. And that seems to be the same conclusion the article comes to regarding Singapore Airlines:

“Long-haul flights are in structural decline, short and medium haul is where the money is. SIA’s future is to become a smaller airline than what it is today, can you foresee the management making such step?” Aziz asked.

Malaysia-772

Bottom line

It’s going to be interesting to see how Singapore Airlines transforms their longhaul operations, given that they’re apparently consistently unprofitable. On one hand it would be a real shame to see them not be as global of a carrier. On the other hand, if the competition from Middle Eastern carriers and low cost carriers is just too strong, they’ve gotta do what’s best for their investors.

They’re already taking steps to adopt to the market, by introducing premium economy, and by competing with low cost carriers through SilkAir and Scoot. But that’s only a start to what’s a much bigger problem.

Do you think Singapore Airlines will eventually shrink as an airline, or will they find a way to make longhaul flying profitable again?

Conversations (52)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

PG Guest

Travellers would pay a premium to travel with SIA in the past because it was in a class of its own , with comfort nobody else had . This is not the case today and SIA's offerings are too expensive compared to the competition , and have far less routes .

0
‼ 0
benjamin tang Guest

(all these are anecdotal but have also heard and read ever increasing amount of negative feedback) singapore airlines' best days are behind them. they used to have the best service hands down (to justify the astronomical price-tags). these days, the ME3 (especially emirates) for the european legs, CX and NH for the transpacific legs trump them in terms of both price and service (and not to mention accruable mileage for all the different price points, which united beats hands down... but let's not talk about "service" on united) they used to be industry leaders but the last 5-10 years have seen them eating the dust of other carriers eg. premium economy (very late into the game, and not particularly spectacular like when they introduced suites, which have also been eclipsed by many other carriers top end offerings) entertainment systems (the krisworld entertainment system used to be top of its class, the excruciatingly slow meal service procedure (in its entirety, not the meal service itself) krisflyer as a FFP also does not have enough pros (great mileage redemption for long haul flights, very occasional mileage redemption promotions, star alliance member) to outweigh the cons (the aforementioned mileage accrual rates. upgrades are also few and far between. twice in 17 years of gold membership, and that was also because i had purchased full priced economy tickets. as opposed to TG. once in 5 flights. and on *surprise* united, when i'm not even a 1K nor elite platinum member. expensive short haul redemptions. service fees required over and above mileage) until they understand the reality they are operating in and innovate or evolve like they used to, the skies might darken considerably. and that would be a real shame.

0
‼ 0
Sam Guest

As a long time loyal SQ fan and PPS member, I am saddened by the current state of Singapore airlines. The plans are aging and need overhaul but mostly the prices are astronomical. For example my mid year business class trip to Houston is 2x more expensive on Singapore airlines than on Emirates, Cathay or even Ana. Same with an upcoming trip to London which i have been trying to use Krisflyer miles on but only the higher priced catagory (780k miles!) is available. I feel that the introduction of premium economy has raised prices and reduced seat availability except for PE catagory which is 70% of a business class seat and more expensive than full business on most airlines. Im trying hard to stay loyal to SQ as my regional asia economy trips (approx 40 / year) are much better on SQ than most of the asian airlines but without the occasional business class then i dont get PPS. This is another negative on SQ as they dont consider economy trips as really counting to elite status.

0
‼ 0
Marcus Lee Guest

I'm sorry for the Grammatical mistakes that I have made. I typed this comment in the middle of the night ( literally at 11:54pm - way pass my bed time) I will be delighted to hear more from the community :)

0
‼ 0
Marcus Lee Guest

Hi there ! I just stumbled onto this article and it gives a very interesting point of view about my national carrier , Singapore Airlines. I guess competition is always there and if you do know the South East Asian ( SEA , for short ) airline industry , you could say that it is highly competitive. I , however , disagree that SQ will not become a regional carrier - simply because we can't. The stakes are high for SQ. Singapore is a young nation , we don't have a predominant race nor religion . We are a multi-racial and multi cultural society. We live with that and are proud of that. This unique society is young ( as compared to other countries ). We have found ways to identify ourselves and create our own culture. The Singapore Girl and Singapore Airlines are one of the key figures. Up to today , many , myself included , are proud to see our icons take to the skies of the world. Lets look back at Singapore's history and SQ's history. SQ used to part of MSA - Malaysian -Singapore Airlines . When Singapore split from the federation of Malaysia the airline (MSA ) split into two , forming Malaysian Airlines and Singapore Airlines. Singapore is a tiny island city state , and we do not have a domestic market to lean back on , so it was decided Singapore Airlines will focus on international routes , while Malaysian Airlines will focus domestic routes and the regional market. Singapore's aviation industry took off with the expansion of SQ and Changi Airport. It was make clear , right from the start that we had to be one of the best and we would have to target international markets to survive. Trust me when I say that the 1960s -1990s era for SEA and Singapore is very very different from what you see today. No one expected Singapore to survive and prosper as a nation. That is a fact , a fact that is still relevant today. Singapore's Aviation Industry accounts for 5.4% of our GDP and is a key industry which our government is investing in. Singapore Airlines was created out of necessity , to connect a small city state with no natural resources and to boost the economy. To show the world what this tiny city state is really capable of. Singapore Airlines may seem to go down the path to become a regional carrier , but it highly unlikely. Your article is backed by statics , my argument is backed by the Singaporean Spirit and Pride of being a Singaporean. Simply put , Singapore Airlines is too big to fail. Singapore Airlines is a national icon , the wings of Singapore. Suggesting that SQ will become a regional carrier will be suggesting that Singapore has weaken - economically and as a society. This special relationship between Singapore Airlines , Singapore and the National Identity of Singaporeans is one that is heavily interlinked and entwined with one another . Simply put , Singapore Airlines is highly unlikely to become a regional carrier because we will never allow SQ ,our national pride and icon , to go down that path. With regards , A Secondary School Airline Enthusiast from Singapore & A Proud Singaporean

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published