Ryanair CEO: “Lufthansa Is Like A Crack Cocaine Junkie Looking For State Aid”

Ryanair Group CEO Michael O’Leary is one of the most controversial guys in the airline industry. A few days ago I wrote about the views O’Leary has on blocking middle seats.

Well, he has a lot more to say, as it turns out.

Interview with Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary

O’Leary just had an interview with Sky News, where he talks about all kinds of topics. This is his first televised interview since the current pandemic started, and as you’d expect, he has quite a bit to say.

First of all, you can watch the interview here, if you’re interested:

I wanted to hit on a few of the highlights:

People don’t understand the refund issue

O’Leary argues that people don’t understand the scale of the refund issue in the airline industry:

  • In a normal month Ryanair processes about 10,000 refunds
  • In April the airline is dealing with 10 million refunds
  • The airline has a quarter of the usual staff working in refunds due to social distancing
  • O’Leary claims they have 10,000x the usual refunds right now, but in reality it’s 1,000x the usual refunds
  • It’s going to take the airline “many months” to get around to refunding everyone; they’re asking people to reschedule travel rather than get a refund in order to “ease the backlog” (hah)

Governments should pay for middle seats

Ryanair has stated that if middle seats need to be blocked on planes they won’t resume flying. According to O’Leary:

  • It delivers nothing in terms of social distancing since you’re still close to others, still have to get to the airport, still have to board and get off the plane, etc.
  • If governments want to force airlines to block middle seats then they should pay for them; for most airlines in Europe profit margins are 4-5% and load factors are 85%, so running a 60% load factor isn’t sustainable
  • Ryanair plans on requiring passengers to wear face masks and doing temperature checks on passengers

Layoffs could be coming in June

Ryanair has kept almost everyone in employment in April and May (thanks to payroll support schemes), but if the groundings continues into June, the airline will have to look at job losses.

O’Leary hopes that there will be a significant uptick in travel in late June or early July.

O’Leary on state aid OMG

Asked whether Lufthansa should get state aid, O’Leary said:

“Lufthansa is like a crack cocaine junkie looking for state aid. They’re already getting huge payroll support from the Germany government. What do you need more state aid for? We don’t have many other costs at the moment because we’re all grounded. They see this as an opportunity to get one last huge quantity of state aid so they can go around and buy up everyone when this is all over.”

There has been a lot of controversy around Virgin Atlantic’s bailout request, given Branson’s wealth and residency. How does O’Leary feel about that request?

“Virgin Atlantic is ridiculous. This is Branson’s second go at trying to fleece the British taxpayer for state aid. He tried this with Flybe. Now you have Virgin Atlantic, owned by Delta and a Caribbean island based non-resident billionaire. Frankly if he’s worried about Virgin he should write the check himself. It’s not like he’s short of money. Sitting in the Virgin Islands as a tax exile asking the British government to bail you out when you have more than sufficient resources to bail out Virgin Atlantic yourself isn’t something that should be considered.”

Bottom line

Um… wow.

I might not always agree with O’Leary, but:

  • He’s always outrageously fun and interesting to listen to
  • He provides some much needed balance to what we otherwise hear in the industry, both in terms of countering the rhetoric we otherwise hear, and also in terms of approaching problems in a different ways

What do you make of this O’Leary interview?

Conversations (55)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Pierre Diamond

@ UpperDeckJohnny... Well not quite... The EU rule is now being transgressed by Alitalia, Air France, KLM, it appears Lufthansa and then undoubtebly its offsprings, LX, OS and SN. BA/IB will surely follow and A3 has stated it will demand a bailout. It looks more to me that the EU regulation won't have a leg to stand on anymore, especially now that airlines openly say they'll reneg on EC261/04. And that's only for the airlines sector. The EU concept, perfectly legit when it applied to 6, then 9 and maybe up to 12 countries, was doomed to make no sense when it involved 28, then 27 members. They are probably done for.

0
‼ 0
Rik Guest

Hang on, the refund thing is a red herring. This is 2020, you could fairly easily either automate the refund process (all bookings are electronic) or allow people to do it online themselves. RA already has the ability to cancel and change flights online, so this should be straightforward. Implying that this will be done one by one, manually, is silly. The real reason is they need to delay that cash going out of the Airline for as long as possible. I totally agree about his other comments, Virgin Atlantic is owned by Delta and Air France, who both got massive bailouts from their governments. VA is a dinosaur airline that needs to go away and be replaced to be honest. It has rarely made money. I can't understand why the Belgian government is bailing out SN as they are owned by LH, why is it their problem. I also thought it was illegal in the EU for a country to artificially support a business, preventing natural Darwin economics from happening. If Airlines are essential for the country then they should be state owned. Supporting inefficient boards and CEO's is not the right way to use tax payers money.

0
‼ 0
Noah Bowie Guest

He made a good point about the aid for Lufthansa. Specifically how if they receive a large enough package from the German government they will just try to buy up much of the competition in Europe. O'Leary however was unusually quiet about IAG. Normally he has something to say about them but not today. Maybe he's realised that IAG had the correct idea of keeping several billion to one side just in case.

0
‼ 0
Kerry Diamond

Well he’s nothing if not entertaining. He is spot on about Virgin though - Branson has misplayed his hand and as a non-resident who pays no taxes here, why on earth should the UK government bail him out? They should request a buyout of his shares, if they want to keep the company running, and nationalise it for a (Hopefully) short period. It would be rather ironic, after all his complaints of BA being a proxy for the government...

0
‼ 0
Prussian Blue Guest

Forget cheap flights . . . I wouldn’t fly Ryanair again if they paid me . . . Good riddance Mr O’Leary, and your dreary airline.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published