Qantas’ Surprising Face Mask Policy

Qantas has today announced the details of their “Fly Well” program, which includes a series of measures that will roll out as of June 12, 2020, to make the flying experience safer.

Qantas will offer face masks, won’t require they be worn

Once onboard, Qantas will provide masks to passengers on each flight. The airline says that while wearing the face mask isn’t mandatory from a safety point of view, the airline “recommends” masks be worn for everyone’s peace of mind.

This is an interesting policy for a couple of reasons:

  • You’d think it would make the most sense to hand out masks earlier in the journey, like at check-in, since in many cases social distancing isn’t possible at the airport, and that poses a risk as well; of course some people skip check-in, so that’s not an ideal solution either
  • Qantas is one of the few airlines that isn’t making wearing a face mask mandatory, but then again, in the US flight attendants are being told not to enforce face mask policies

In fairness, it’s worth acknowledging that Australia has handled the current pandemic extremely well, with a very limited number of cases and deaths, at least compared to other countries. For flights not traveling to other regions, I assume COVID-19 just isn’t as much of a concern as it is in other parts of the world.

Qantas’ CEO, Alan Joyce, said the following about the face mask policy:

“We’re relying on the cooperation of passengers to help make these changes work for everyone’s benefit, and we thank them in advance for that. Given the great job Australians have done at flattening the curve, we’re confident they’ll respond positively to these temporary changes to how we fly.”

Qantas’ Medical Director, Dr. Ian Hosegood, said the following about the safety of flying right now:

“The data shows that actual risk of catching Coronavirus on an aircraft is already extremely low. That’s due to a combination of factors, including the cabin air filtration system, the fact people don’t sit face-to-face and the high backs of aircraft seats acting as a physical barrier. As far as the virus goes, an aircraft cabin is a very different environment to other forms of public transport.

Social distancing on an aircraft isn’t practical the way it is on the ground, and given the low transmission risk on board, we don’t believe it’s necessary in order to be safe. The extra measures we’re putting place will reduce the risk even further.”

Qantas will offer passengers face masks

Other Qantas safety measures

In addition to offering face masks but not requiring that passengers wear them, the airline is rolling out a series of other initiatives.

Qantas’ pre-flight initiatives include the following:

  • The airline encourages contactless check-in (via the website and app) and self-serve bag drop
  • Hand sanitizing stations will be offered at departure gates
  • Qantas Lounges will feature increased physical distancing, hand sanitizing stations, enhanced disinfection of surfaces, and adjustments to food & drink services

Qantas’ onboard initiatives include the following (in addition to the above mask policy):

  • Enhanced cleaning of aircraft with a disinfectant effective against COVID-19, with a focus on high contact areas
  • Sanitizing wipes given to all passengers to wipe down seats
  • Simplified service and catering to minimize touch points for crews and passengers
  • Passengers will be asked to limit movement around the cabin once seated
  • Boarding and disembarking will be sequenced to minimize crowding

Qantas is implementing several new safety measures

Bottom line

Qantas is taking a different approach than other airlines when it comes to face masks. They are offering face masks to passengers, but aren’t forcing passengers to wear the them.

Of the airlines that have introduced updated safety protocols (not all airlines have, because not all have resumed flying), nearly all of them have made masks mandatory, so it’s surprising to see Qantas taking a different approach, especially given that they won’t be blocking middle seats.

I’ll be curious to see if “relying on the cooperation of passengers” does the trick, or if we see a bunch of arguments breaking out on Qantas flights over use of face masks.

What do you make of Qantas’ policy of offering passengers face masks but not requiring they be worn?

Conversations (27)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Wade Guest

What a great and sensible policy. At best, only 7% of the global population is truly at-risk from becoming severely ill and dying from COVID-19 (per latest CFAR statistics). Only a fraction of this 7% population will actually die (i.e., mortality rate). Thus, 93% of the population will be perfectly fine with or without contracting the virus. It makes no sense to burden 100% of a population in order to protect a 7% subset that is also perfectly capable of (and has been advised to) taking steps to protect themselves. A better policy would be to more strongly recommend — maybe mandate — that individuals falling into this 7% of the population take the necessary steps to social distance, self-isolate, and quarantine. Then, no one will die, regardless of how rapidly this spreads. No masks, no economic destruction, no canceling of flights, no more travel restrictions. Obviously, though, we still have people dying from COVID-19, which means we have an extremely stupid and selfish subset of the 7% at-risk group that is purposefully placing themselves in situations where they can receive the virus.... This is the group that needs to cease and desist!! Of course, all this assumes we want to stop COVID-19 deaths. That’s my goal. I could care less about slowing the spread. Maybe everyone wearing masks is doing so to put on a good show and avoid being shamed for not doing so.

0
‼ 0
Paolo Diamond

The Australian response has been successful, with the notable and tragic exception of a fiasco involving a cruise ship ...Ruby Princess, permitted to dock and disembark in Sydney despite significant flu-like illness onboard. The vast majority of cases have involved returning travelers, many of them from the USA. Indeed, it was very apparent to everyone in Australia that there must have been a huge underestimation of the number of cases in the US, as many, many cases were people getting off QF and UA...at a time when President Trump was still saying “no big deal” I wear a mask, more out of habit from time spent in Asia, where it’s viewed as a courtesy to others as much as anything else.

0
‼ 0
seanpodge New Member

Australia has done pretty well, certainly compared to the USA and western Europe. But still, mistakes were made. The obvious one is the Ruby Princess debacle, where 2700 odd passengers were just allowed to disembark in the middle of Sydney before returning home in various parts of Australia to spread the virus. The Aus. government early on also seemed to try to make its messaging about COVID restrictions as confusing as possible and while they were fast to block travelers from China they were a bit sluggish to block travelers from the USA and other affected places. On the actual article, I'm not really sure what QF is trying to do. "Yes, COVID is serious and here are some masks but we're not actually going to make anyone wear them (even if mask wearing is more about protecting the people near the wearer rather than the wearer him/herself)". Remember that this is an airline that takes what its paying passengers wear so seriously that it will refuse entry to its lounges if you wear the wrong shoes, so to suddenly be so laissez-faire about face masks in the middle of a pandemic is a bit odd to me.

0
‼ 0
CS Guest

Well said David! I don't like wearing a mask too, but during this pandemic, I cannot be selfish or stubborn. In fact, I think It is our civic duty to wear one when in public right now.

0
‼ 0
Mh Diamond

Agreed, David it wasn't "the best in the world" as Morgan proclaimed, although it was a generally good approach, although slow to start, and then slow to follow up in the middle. As said, look to Taiwan, Hong Kong and Singapore for generally better approaches (which doesn't mean perfect - but Australia's wasn't either. Our biggest advantage was our remoteness, and geographic separation.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published