Open Skies Campaign Shifts Propaganda Focus Towards Presidential Flattery

Within the past week the United States and United Arab Emirates have reached an agreement in their Open Skies battle that lasted for several years. The way I view it, the resolution is a victory for Emirates and Etihad, and a loss for the US carriers:

  • Emirates and Etihad are agreeing to publish annual financial statements consistent with internationally recognized accounting standards
  • Emirates and Etihad have stated that as of now they have no plans to add additional fifth freedom flights to the US; Emirates currently operates these flights from New York to Milan and Newark to Athens

In other words, it’s business as usual for Emirates and Etihad, and they must be thrilled about it, as they should be. The US is doing nothing to stop the “billions of dollars of government subsidies” (as the “big three” US carriers like to call it), and is doing nothing to limit the capacity these airlines can offer between the UAE and US. The “playing field” is no more or less level than it was before.

Of course the “big three” US carriers have spent millions of dollars lobbying for reform, and they don’t want to come out of this looking like losers. After all, some middle managers have to justify the way in which they spent money. The deal was structured in such a way that both sides can feel like they won (or at least didn’t lose). We haven’t heard a whole lot from Emirates and Etihad, while the leaders at the big US carriers have been engaged in a delusional victory lap.

Their latest victory lap was today, as the Partnership for Open & Fair Skies (funded by American, Delta, and United) took out full page ads in the New York Times and New York Post thanking President Trump. My first issue here is that they don’t seem to know their audience very well. Is the “failing New York Times” really the place to take out an ad that you want Trump to see?

Here’s the full text of the ad:

Thank You President Trump For Standing Up For American Jobs

President Donald J. Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Trump,

With your new agreement to stop trade violations by the United Arab Emirates, you have shown the world that your administration will not stand for unfair trade deals that hurt American jobs and businesses. On behalf of the men and women of the U.S. airline industry, thank you for taking decisive action.

For over a decade, the UAE and Qatar have provided billions of dollars in subsidies to their government-owned airlines (Emirates, Etihad Airways and Qatar Airways), violating Open Skies trade agreements with the United States, and blocking fair competition with American businesses. By acting to enforce our agreements and restore a level playing field, your administration has again shown that you stand with American workers and will fight for our jobs and economy.

As with your successful agreement with Qatar earlier this year, this new agreement with the UAE will save American jobs. More than 310 members of Congress, more than a dozen governors, and hundreds of local elected officials and business leaders from both parties agree with you that the U.S. must enforce its Open Skies trade deals. Now we look forward to working with you to hold the UAE and Qatar to their word.

Thank you for your leadership and your commitment to the American people.

Sincerely,
The Partnership for Open & Fair Skies

Here’s a picture of the ad, which oddly shows a picture of a Cathay Pacific A330 with the tail blurred:

To be clear, this isn’t supposed to be a pro or anti-Trump post. Personally I commend the president for not acting on this issue and for continuing to give the Gulf carriers unrestricted access to the US under the Open Skies treaty. It’s an area where the Obama and Trump administrations clearly came to similar conclusions. The administration did the right thing, even if the above letter doesn’t reflect what the agreement states. But the degree to which the “big three” are rewriting history and self-congratulating themselves is a bit much…

Conversations (49)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

callum Guest

Gob - If you profit from the slave economy Dubai is built upon, the very least you deserve is being "painted with the same brush". I'm terribly sorry your feelings were hurt, but is that really as bad as the hundreds of people dying from working in horrific and unsafe working conditions or the thousands held in quasi-servitude with withheld wages and confiscated passports? I think not. While most people return home from Dubai rabbiting on about the vast wealth and luxury surroundings, it's the image of migrant workers slumped outside a building site in sweltering temperatures (I felt like I was close to fainting walking merely 500m down the street...) that will forever be etched in my brain from that city.

0
‼ 0
John Guest

@John Rosson No problem I will be flying LH 747-8 in a couple of weeks but only as a lowly business class passenger=) At least I snagged a seat on the upper deck

0
‼ 0
Juan M Member

@LAXJeff Very fake, lol.

0
‼ 0
John Rosson Guest

@John Upon reflection, did not mean to offend you or anyone, politics are a tough subject. My apologies. I guess my point was I just did not feel like this awesome travel blog was a good place to critisize current or past administrations... Having said that, I am indeed a conservative, but also proud that I have both liberal & conservative close friends. On an actual travel note - flew Lufthansa 747-8 F last night (1L), MEX-FRA. Excellent service, had the fish (snapper), food seemed much better than usual. The champs was CH Blanc des Millenaires, good stuff. Happy travels to all

0
‼ 0
Luke Vader Diamond

So the U.S. airlines take out a full-page ad showing an Asian (Cathay Pacific) airline flying an Airbus A330 aircraft? What's the airplane doing, sending American jobs overseas? The irony of the ad is hilarious. The U.S. carriers (and their marketing/ad people) must be either playing dumb or sending an underhanded cynical message.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT