Virgin Atlantic Launching Seoul Incheon Flights As Part Of Clever Deal

Virgin Atlantic Launching Seoul Incheon Flights As Part Of Clever Deal

15

While Virgin Atlantic’s route network is heavily focused on transatlantic flights, the airline is launching a couple of new routes to Asia. Several months ago, Virgin Atlantic announced plans to launch flights to South Korea. Oddly the flight was put on sale, and then the flight was pulled shortly thereafter, leaving many to wonder what was going on, or if the airline was having second thoughts (it wouldn’t be the first time — just take a look at the planned Sao Paulo service).

Well, this flight is now once again on sale (with a different schedule), so let’s cover the details. This is in addition to Virgin Atlantic launching seasonal flights to Thailand.

Virgin Atlantic helping Korean Air by launching Seoul flights

As of March 29, 2026, Virgin Atlantic will launch a new daily flight between London Heathrow (LHR) and Seoul Incheon (ICN). The flight is expected to operate with the following schedule:

VS208 London to Seoul departing 2:10PM arriving 10:30AM (+1 day)
VS209 Seoul to London departing 12:20PM arriving 6:50PM

The 5,520-mile flight is blocked at 12hr20min eastbound and 14hr30min westbound. That flight time is way longer than you’d expect based on the distance, and that’s because of the need to avoid Russian airspace, meaning the flight will operate with a rather roundabout routing.

Virgin Atlantic will use a Boeing 787-9 for the route, featuring 258 seats. This includes 31 business class seats, 35 premium economy seats, and 192 economy seats. Unfortunately this features the carrier’s rather outdated cabins, though these planes should be getting an overhaul as of 2028.

Virgin Atlantic’s 787 Upper Class business class

The backstory of this route is interesting, since these plans were first announced nearly three years ago, in early 2023. By launching this route, Virgin Atlantic is picking up additional slots at London Heathrow, and is helping Korean Air. Wait, how would Virgin Atlantic be helping Korean Air by competing against the airline head-to-head?

We recently saw Korean Air and Asiana finalize their merger, which was years in the making. The airlines faced some regulatory challenges, as governments of several countries needed to sign off on this merger. The UK was one country where Korean Air had been facing some challenges, as the Competition and Markets Authority pushed back against the merger.

The concern was that Asiana and Korean Air were the only airlines flying between the UK and South Korea, so if the airlines merged, there would be no competition in the market. This would be bad for consumers, and it would be bad for the movement of cargo between the countries.

The UK and Korean Air ended up coming to the following agreement:

  • Korean Air has to make seven weekly London Heathrow slot pairs available to Virgin Atlantic
  • Virgin Atlantic can use those slot pairs to launch flights between London Heathrow and Seoul Incheon
Korean Air would have had no competition to the UK

Will Virgin Atlantic’s Seoul Incheon route last?

Nowadays Virgin Atlantic’s route network to Asia is pretty limited. The airline flies to India year-round, to the Maldives (and soon Phuket) seasonally, and also has a new route to Riyadh, as part of a partnership with Riyadh Air.

However, we’ve seen Virgin Atlantic cancel just about all other eastbound long haul flights. We’re not just talking about the cancelation in recent years of flights to Islamabad, Lahore, Shanghai, and Tel Aviv, but going back further than that, the airline used to fly to destinations like Hong Kong and Tokyo.

I can’t imagine that Virgin Atlantic would have otherwise launched flights to Seoul, but I can see how the logic adds up here:

  • When you’re an airline with a hub at Heathrow, one of the biggest challenges is acquiring slots to grow; if you’re given slots to operate a route, that’s a big incentive to consider
  • Virgin Atlantic is a member of SkyTeam, and at least has the benefit of having connectivity in South Korea, thanks to the partnership with Korean Air
  • Delta owns a 49% stake in Virgin Atlantic, and also has a transpacific joint venture with Korean Air, so getting the merger approved was in Delta’s best interest

So while this route doesn’t seem like one that Virgin Atlantic would have otherwise independently operated, given the circumstances, I can see how this makes sense.

Still, I’m curious to see if it lasts in the long run. Here’s where it gets interesting. The terms of the deal allow Virgin Atlantic to keep the slots and use them for other routes, as long as the Seoul service is maintained for at least three years. So I think it’s safe to assume the service will last for three years, but will it last for longer than that?

Virgin Atlantic has limited aircraft and doesn’t have plans to grow its fleet that much, so utilizing planes as efficiently as possible is even higher of a priority than at other airlines.

Frankly, I’m skeptical about the long term viability of this route. Virgin Atlantic’s 787s just don’t have a competitive hard product (at least until 2028 at the earliest), and for connectivity beyond Seoul, most people would rather fly a Gulf carrier via the Middle East, an Asian carrier known for top service, etc.

Will Virgin Atlantic’s Seoul Incheon route last?

Bottom line

Virgin Atlantic will be launching daily flights between London Heathrow and Seoul Incheon as of March 2026. The UK was raising concerns about the merger between Korean Air and Asiana, given the lack of air service competition between the two countries.

With Virgin Atlantic now agreeing to operate this route in exchange for the slots needed to do so, this seems like a win-win-win. Virgin Atlantic only has to maintain this service for three years, and can then utilize the slots for other routes.

I’m skeptical as to whether the route will last beyond the three years, given Virgin Atlantic’s struggles with eastbound flights that don’t connect into the North America network.

What do you make of Virgin Atlantic launching flights to Seoul?

Conversations (15)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. BZ Guest

    There is nothing clever about anything Delta UK does.

  2. Wonder A Guest

    I'm glad that Virgin Atlantic is making some decisions without regard for Delta. Virgin Atlantic finally sees that Delta is deteriorating and must start isolating Delta.

  3. Steve Guest

    Any award info for this route and transfer partners?

  4. Tim Dunn Diamond

    DL might have orchestrated the arrangement as part of its group of equity airlines but KE will reap the benefits of having an airline "in its fold" to supplement its service.

    as for the routing, VS will have to do what every other western airline has to do between western Europe to NE Asia which is to fly south as if going to India and then go north when you can be clear of...

    DL might have orchestrated the arrangement as part of its group of equity airlines but KE will reap the benefits of having an airline "in its fold" to supplement its service.

    as for the routing, VS will have to do what every other western airline has to do between western Europe to NE Asia which is to fly south as if going to India and then go north when you can be clear of Russian, Iran, and Afghanistan.

    The ME3 hubs are further south than the routing that western airlines have to take - so, no, going on a ME carrier doesn't make sense if distance and time is the issue.

    and let's also not forget that EK still has aircraft without direct aisle business class = so let's not carried away about VS' business class seats - which are, at least direct aisle.

    1. Samo Gold

      Yes, Delta runs the world and decides anti-monopoly measures in the UK. I love how you can somehow make even the most unrelated topics about DL.

    2. Tim Dunn Diamond

      you did read the article, Samo?

      Ben accurately noted that DL is behind a certain part of this; he and I only differ in the extent. KE benefits in retaining a LHR-ICN flight in a friendly camp, even if KE and VS do not and likely will not have a joint venture in the near term.

      just because you don't like DL doesn't mean that they aren't accurately a major force in global aviation and that there are people that recognize it.

    3. Eskimo Guest

      @Tim Dunn
      “Act Your Wage,” “No Need To Be Extra”

  5. S_LEE Diamond

    The only advantage of connecting with Korean Air would be that you can fly one-stop to almost anywhere in Japan.
    With ME3, you can fly to Tokyo and Osaka only, but Korean Air flies from ICN to HND, NRT, KIX, UKB, KOJ, KMQ, KMJ, NGS, NGO, KIJ, CTS, AOJ, OKJ, OKA and FUK. When you wanna travel to somewhere in Japan other than Tokyo or Osaka, KE will be the most convenient option.

  6. Phillip Diamond

    No sign of any award seats yet!

    1. Creditcrunch Diamond

      I was told they should be available over the weekend.

  7. Alex Guest

    https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/safety-ops-regulation/kftc-begins-korean-air-asiana-slot-transfers-10-routes

    Strange how the KFTC listed Seoul-Seattle as a route up for redistribution considering it is also served by Delta (not sure if KFTC considers Delta a competitor) and Alaskan/Hawaiian Airlines.

    Regarding Delta’s plans to launch JFK-ICN, if the KFTC doesn’t consider delta as a competitor and if the KFTC considers JFK and EWR as separate destinations (Air Premia and soon United fly Newark Seoul), as crazy and unlikely as it sounds could see...

    https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/safety-ops-regulation/kftc-begins-korean-air-asiana-slot-transfers-10-routes

    Strange how the KFTC listed Seoul-Seattle as a route up for redistribution considering it is also served by Delta (not sure if KFTC considers Delta a competitor) and Alaskan/Hawaiian Airlines.

    Regarding Delta’s plans to launch JFK-ICN, if the KFTC doesn’t consider delta as a competitor and if the KFTC considers JFK and EWR as separate destinations (Air Premia and soon United fly Newark Seoul), as crazy and unlikely as it sounds could see AA launch JFK-ICN.

  8. chris w Guest

    It boggles my mind that the UK government would have any influence over two Korean companies merging.

    1. Icarus Guest

      It happens with all businesses operating in other countries. If say, United and American merge, it would need approval from governments worldwide as they might have a monopoly on many routes rendering it impossible for others to compete.

      The OZ KE merger need approval of all countries they operated to/from.

      That said Virgin is absolutely not competing with Korean as they are both SkyTeam members, and VS is 49pct owned by Delta. Competition would...

      It happens with all businesses operating in other countries. If say, United and American merge, it would need approval from governments worldwide as they might have a monopoly on many routes rendering it impossible for others to compete.

      The OZ KE merger need approval of all countries they operated to/from.

      That said Virgin is absolutely not competing with Korean as they are both SkyTeam members, and VS is 49pct owned by Delta. Competition would mean be BA or Air Premia operating the route.

    2. Alex Guest

      Seoul to San Francisco the KFTC considered United and Asiana to be competitors despite being in star alliance with United launching a 2nd daily sfo icn and soon Ewr icn. Ewr icn launch appears to be close to Korean Asiana integration date.

    3. Phillip Diamond

      It was the US DOJ that effectively delayed the Asiana/Korean merger!

Featured Comments Most helpful comments ( as chosen by the OMAAT community ).

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Icarus Guest

It happens with all businesses operating in other countries. If say, United and American merge, it would need approval from governments worldwide as they might have a monopoly on many routes rendering it impossible for others to compete. The OZ KE merger need approval of all countries they operated to/from. That said Virgin is absolutely not competing with Korean as they are both SkyTeam members, and VS is 49pct owned by Delta. Competition would mean be BA or Air Premia operating the route.

2
S_LEE Diamond

The only advantage of connecting with Korean Air would be that you can fly one-stop to almost anywhere in Japan. With ME3, you can fly to Tokyo and Osaka only, but Korean Air flies from ICN to HND, NRT, KIX, UKB, KOJ, KMQ, KMJ, NGS, NGO, KIJ, CTS, AOJ, OKJ, OKA and FUK. When you wanna travel to somewhere in Japan other than Tokyo or Osaka, KE will be the most convenient option.

1
BZ Guest

There is nothing clever about anything Delta UK does.

0
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,527,136 Miles Traveled

39,914,500 Words Written

42,354 Posts Published

Keep Exploring OMAAT