Report: Qatar Airways 787 Pilot Loses Situational Awareness, Puts Plane Into Dive

My goodness, the number of near disasters we’ve seen in the airline industry lately is troubling. We’ve seen some recent ground incidents in the United States (between an American 777 and Delta 737 at JFK, and between a Southwest 737 and FedEx 767 at AUS), and here’s an incident that happened shortly after takeoff in Qatar.

Qatar Airways 787 enters steep descent after takeoff

The Aviation Herald has the story of what happened to Qatar Airways flight QR161 from Doha (DOH) to Copenhagen (CPH) on January 10, 2023 (we’re only finding out about this now, because the pilots never reported the incident). The flight was operated by a Boeing 787-8 with the registration code A7-BCO.

The Dreamliner departed runway 16L around 2AM local time, and started its standard climb, making a left turn to the east. The plane climbed to 1,850 feet, but then started losing altitude. We’re not just talking about a few feet, but rather the plane started a steep descent, and lost 1,000 feet of altitude within 24 seconds, bringing it down to only 850 feet.

The pilots ended up recovering the aircraft, and continued the flight to Copenhagen. The plane landed there without incident 6hr2min after departing Doha. If you want to see all this data for yourself, just take a look at the Flightradar24 tracking for this flight.

Flightradar24 data for this flight
Flightradar24 data for this flight

So, why would the plane lose 1,000 feet of altitude during such a critical phase of flight, when the weather conditions were perfectly good? The Aviation Herald reports that the first officer was the pilot flying, and while climbing through 1,600 feet, the pilots were cleared to fly toward the next waypoint (essentially an imaginary point in the sky used for navigation).

The first officer was flying the aircraft manually and without flight director indications, and lost situational awareness, sending the aircraft into a 3,000 foot per minute descent. The descent was so steep that the sink rate exceeded the flap speed limits, as the plane was flying over 300 knots true airspeed at that point.

The captain then took control of the aircraft, and managed to recover it at an altitude of 850 feet. Keep in mind at a descent rate of 3,000 feet per minute (and the rate usually increases quickly if you’re sinking), that 787 was less than 20 seconds from having a very different ending.

The flight continued to Copenhagen

This incident is really concerning

For every catastrophe there are many near catastrophes, and this was definitely one of those.

A Boeing 787 pilot shouldn’t be losing situational awareness while manually flying a jet out of a hub airport in nice weather conditions. Period. Yet somehow the plane got into a situation where it was within seconds from ending up in the Gulf.

The most disturbing part of this incident is that it wasn’t reported at the time, and it’s only coming out now, nearly a month later. I mean, I guess I’m not surprised — I can’t imagine the pilot would have had a job after an investigation was performed, especially in the Gulf region, where you don’t have unions.

I feel really bad for pilots in the Gulf, as they work some brutal shifts. No matter how much you program your body, performing such high pressure and critical tasks at 2AM isn’t easy.

But the way that aviation becomes safer is by reporting incidents, to be sure they can be avoided in the future. Therefore not reporting something like this is reckless, even if it comes at the expense of your job.

Bottom line

A few weeks back, a Qatar Airways Boeing 787 lost 1,000 feet of altitude shortly after takeoff from Doha. The first officer was allegedly manually flying the plane, and lost situational awareness, causing him to put the plane into a steep dive. Given the sink rate, the plane was within seconds of plunging into the Gulf. Fortunately the captain took control of the jet and managed to recover it.

What do you make of this Qatar Airways 787 incident?

Conversations (80)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Capt. Jack M Schmidt (Ret.) Guest

If this was the case of a green FO, or even an experienced one, the captain would have had ultimate responsibility for this occurrence. Watch 'em like a hawk, that's what I did when I was in the left seat. Now the knuckleheads at FAA, ICAO and some of the Unions are investigating going to one-pilot operations. Are they nuts? Bring back the flight engineer. Three brains and six eyeballs are better than two brains and four eyeballs and a hell of a lot better than one brain and two eyes.

0
‼ 0
LenK Guest

Making an assumption that the First Officer flying was not inebriated, he might not have been 'current' on his instrument flying status as he, likely, (like so many other airline pilots, esp. those who fly long segments), meaning his instrument 'scan' was rusty and he could not stay ahead of the airplane. There are at least six cockpit instruments pilots need to scan to safwely fly the plane in instrument conditionss or black nights with not natural sense of the horizon. I used the term "so many other airlne pilots" because many don't hand-fly the aircraft very often and let the auto-pilot do the work right after wheels-up on takeoff, until final approach upon landing. Without regular practice, instrument scan skills get rusty and disaster can happen.

0
‼ 0
Ranjan Datta Guest

Quatar Airlines is no mean a co. Even then when such incidents occurs, it's time for aircraft manufacturing cos to have system in place overriding pilots errors or absentmindedness. Brain mapping headgears ?

0
‼ 0
Piyush Guest

I was in this flight it was nightmare , I am still in shock by the incident and there are many people who got scared.

0
‼ 0
Donal Guest

This incident seems very similar to for one that took place United Airlines Boeing 777 flying from Maui, Hawaii, to San Francisco, California in December - are they sure about the explanation for the Qatar flight i.e. that the co-pilot "lost situational awareness" and it wasn't something else ?

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published