Pakistan International Airlines Tells Crews To Wear Undergarments

While it’s normal for airlines to have behavior and appearance standards for employees, this has to be one of the stranger notices we’ve seen. I first wrote about this a couple of days ago, but there’s now an update, as the person behind the memo has issued a “clarification.”

PIA tells cabin crew to be more presentable

Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) seems to have some issues with how crews are dressing during layovers, when not in uniform. PIA’s General Manager of Flight Services suggests that the way that cabin crew are dressing is leaving a “poor impression” and “portrays a negative image” of the airline.

In a memo to employees, the following concerns are brought up:

“It has been observed with great concern that a few cabin crew tend to dress casually while traveling intercity, staying in hotels and visiting various suffices. Such dressing leaves a poor impression on the viewer and portrays a negative image of not only the individual but also of the organisation.”

The memo goes on to ask cabin crew to “dress properly” in formal plain clothes over “proper undergarments.” It’s also stated that “the clothing worn by males and females should be in accordance with our cultural and national morals.”

Grooming officers at the airline have been told to monitor crews, and report back if there are any deviations from these policies. Ah, grooming officers doing undergarment checks, what could possibly go wrong?!

Pakistan International Airlines 777 business class

This memo seems… oddly specific?

Admittedly airlines around the globe have different standards when it comes to how crews have to behave off the plane. In some cases this is specific to how employees must behave while in uniform and not on the plane (like at airports), while in other cases it involves how they must behave when not in uniform (like at layover hotels).

This memo from PIA (minus the undergarment reference) reminds me of that Pan Am training video about how employees should behave at hotels, as they’re still representing the airline.

Even so, I’m a bit confused by PIA’s memo. The airline is asking employees to dress in “formal plain clothes” when on layovers. Maybe that’s not meant so literally, but… why? If they’re going to the hotel gym or on a walk in a warm climate, are “formal plain clothes” really necessary?

And of course that’s the less strange point here — the much stranger thing is the request to wear undergarments. This leads me to only two possible conclusions:

  • Have there honestly been repeated incidents that involve crews not wearing undergarments, and that somehow getting back to management?
  • Is someone at PIA just a little bit pervy, and that’s reflected in what they’ve chosen to focus on in a memo?

I mean, we’ve seen plenty of airlines with much higher customer service standards than PIA write memos to employees about appearance, though I don’t ever recall undergarments specifically being referenced. Hmmm…

PIA clarifies memo about undergarments

Following widespread reporting of PIA’s appearance standards memo, the person behind the memo has issued a statement:

“Despite the fact that the spirit behind the advisory was to ensure proper dress code, however, the standard bulletin, inadvertently, came out with an inappropriate selection of words. I personally feel regretful and am fully convinced that the words could have been more civilised and appropriate in this context instead of words published, which, unfortunately, are being trolled and twisted towards the defamation of the company.”

Okay, that’s kind of a weird apology. He acknowledges that the words were “inappropriate” and he “feels regretful,” but also claims that the quote is being “trolled and twisted towards the defamation of the company.”

Bottom line

Pakistan International Airlines has reminded cabin crew that they need to dress appropriately even when not in uniform. They’ve been told to wear formal plain clothes over “proper undergarments,” which sure makes me wonder what exactly the backstory is that prompted this memo to be written.

In the meantime a quasi-apology has been issued. The person behind the statement acknowledges that the words were inappropriate, but also claims that people are using the statement to defame the company.

What do you make of this PIA memo to cabin crew?

(Tip of the hat to Paddle Your Own Kanoo)

Conversations (304)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

SAS Guest

When flight attendants are off duty at hotels, they have the option of having fun and relaxing. They do NOT have the option of projecting a negative image of the airline they represent, nor making a nuisance of themselves in hotels or restaurants. The notice from PIA is thus appropriate but could have been worded more specifically.

0
‼ 0
Adnan Guest

JD Guest..... It's also surprising that christians or others can't be found almost naked 24/7............ This also should be surprising to you, i believe. But for us it's not surprising coz no one is wearing and/or required to wear any specific costume 24 hours since it's not possible, one has to sleep, take shower etc.. etc. . So it's a very stupid remark by you that why muslims are not wearing burqa 24/7.

0
‼ 0
Amey Foster Guest

@JD. I'm not surprised that you're surprised! You come across for sure like the stereo typical American; Media portrayal of the rest of the world is gospel and therefore has to be right, even though you've never witnessed or researched anything for yourself, nor have you ever ventured out of your State, but still you're gonna consider yourself to be worldly...... FYI, PIA, from its inception had female Cabin Crew that wore uniforms designed by none other than Pierre Cardin. Further more, if you bothered to watch any Pakistani Soap Opera or even News Channels, you will see that 95% of the women don't cover their hair. Either way, wearing a Burkha is a woman's decision, so respect it or shut the hell up. I mean....... if you decided to cross dress, who are we tell you what's what and you'd still demand us to respect you for it right? To conclude: This article was a complete waste of time. The imbecile that wrote it doesn't know the meaning of public interest. The Publisher has more money than sense, I wouldn't pay $2 to the half wit that wrote it, let alone put it up on my portal.

0
‼ 0
Emily Guest

Another shoddy piece of writing that really doesn't provide anything more than a platform for imbeciles to make racist remarks.

0
‼ 0
harry peters Guest

too many mile-high club members on that airline and others as well. more than once id see used undergarments in the toilet dustbins. due to sudden unplanned ‘encounters’ between airline crews, passengers and a mix of random others, undergarments get soiled then discarded. this forces many to go about without. management noticed this trend and thus this memo…

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published