JetBlue Losing Amsterdam Schiphol Slots In 2024

It looks like JetBlue will be forced to cancel its service to Amsterdam in the coming months…

Amsterdam Schiphol capacity cuts impact JetBlue

Amsterdam Schiphol Airport will see a reduced annual flight cap introduced in 2024. This comes as the Dutch government has made the decision of implementing a new “green” flight cap at the country’s largest airport. With this, as of the summer of 2024, Schiphol Airport will be restricted to 452,500 annual flights, down from the current cap of 500,000 flights.

Personally I find the justification for this change questionable. I can appreciate the need to work toward climate goals, but it seems to me like incentivizing the use of more efficient aircraft makes more sense than a blanket flight cap with no other considerations.

As you’d expect, a reduction in annual flights at the airport means that airlines will have to start cutting service. We now have a sense of what that will look like, as Airport Coordination Netherlands (ACNL), which is responsible for allocating slots at the airport, has revealed what will be changing.

The expectation is that as of the summer of 2024, the following restrictions will be added:

  • 24 airlines without historical rights and slots at the airport (including JetBlue) will not be granted any takeoff or landing slots at the airport
  • Airlines with historical rights and slots at the airport will need to reduce their traffic by 3.1%, as the first stage of capacity cuts

JetBlue launched flights to Amsterdam in the summer of 2023, out of Boston and New York. The airline was able to convince regulators to give the airline slots, and the airline offers this service year-round. However, JetBlue will soon have to cancel flights.

JetBlue will have to cancel flights to Amsterdam Schiphol

JetBlue demands KLM have JFK slots taken away

JetBlue is now arguing the Department of Transportation (DOT) should ban Dutch flag carrier KLM from New York JFK Airport, as a reciprocal action. As the airline has stated in a filing:

“If the Dutch Government is allowed to effectively expel new entrant JetBlue from AMS without facing any consequential and proportional countermeasures from the Department, other governments may decide to follow suit.”

I understand JetBlue is making every argument possible to try to keep its slots, but the airline is really grasping at straws here:

  • KLM is more impacted by these slot reductions than any other airline, and is a privately owned airline
  • KLM is totally against these capacity cuts, arguing that “this is very harmful for KLM and endangers the network that connects the Netherlands with the rest of the world”
  • JetBlue was a new entrant at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, while KLM has been flying to New York Kennedy Airport for decades
  • New York Kennedy Airport isn’t currently cutting slots, so banning KLM would be purely punitive
  • The new flight caps aren’t in any way anti-US or anti-JetBlue, but rather it’s logical that if you have to start cutting slots, you start with those that were most recently issued, that don’t come with historical rights

So while I’m absolutely not in favor of these new flight caps, and while I can appreciate JetBlue’s frustration, JetBlue’s “revenge” argument seems weak.

JetBlue wants to kick KLM out of New York Kennedy

Bottom line

Amsterdam Schiphol Airport will see the introduction of a new flight cap as of the summer of 2024, meaning capacity at the airport has to be reduced by roughly 10%. We’ve finally found out what those flight cuts will look like. The two dozen newest entrants to the airport will have to cut service, while existing airlines with historical rights to fly there will have to cut service by 3.1%.

What do you make of the way Amsterdam Schiphol slots are being reduced?

Conversations (85)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Exit Row Seat Guest

On November 2, the US Dept of Transportation approved complaints by JetBlue Airways and trade group Airlines for America (A4A) against the government of the Netherlands and European Union for alleged violations related to capacity cuts at Amsterdam Schiphol airport. I'm sure several other governments and airlines will complain. Looks like a diplomatic cat fight in the making!!

0
‼ 0
Michael Guest

I’ve seen a couple of others mention this: why not Brussels? I recall in the 70s and 80s a lot of US carriers flew to Brussels (and SABENA served several US cities). Might it be more economical and rather smart for JetBlue to try JFK and BOS nonstops to Brussels? It’s a great city itself, and just a short train ride to either Amsterdam or Paris (or Luxembourg, Rotterdam, or Düsseldorf). There’s already tons of competition to AMS and CDG from both cities anyway.

0
‼ 0
Zach Guest

I expect JetBlue will probably end up in Brussels if this spat with Schipol continues.

0
‼ 0
BZ Guest

Go woke. Go broke. Europe is a joke!

0
‼ 0
iamhere Guest

JetBlue should find a different place in Europe to fly to rather than argue with this decision. Ultimately this decision by the Dutch government will hurt the Netherlands as fewer people will change planes there and visit and will choose other places. Their argument is not good because KLM is not a new airline to JFK.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published