Anbang Withdraws Starwood Offer; Marriott And Starwood To Merge

The past few weeks we’ve seen a fierce battle for control of Starwood, as Marriott and Anbang have been bidding against one another:

  • Last November, Marriott agreed to purchase Starwood, with each share of Starwood stock being worth 0.92 Marriott shares plus $2 in cash
  • Then in March, Chinese insurance group Anbang made an offer of $78 in cash per share, which Starwood accepted
  • Then days later, Marriott made an offer which Starwood accepted, where each share of Starwood stock was worth 0.8 Marriott shares plus $21 in cash
  • Then this Monday, Chinese insurance group Anbang made an offer of $82.75 in cash; while it wasn’t immediately accepted, Starwood’s Board of Directors indicated it was “reasonably likely to lead to a superior proposal”

Marriott-Starwood-Merger-1

As I recently explained, Anbang is a mysterious company, so they are a bit of a wild card. We don’t know what Starwood would look like under their ownership, though I’ve still been in favor of that over a Marriott merger:

  • We’ve seen what consolidation has done to the airline industry, and we don’t want to see the same happen to the hotel industry; a merger between Marriott and Starwood would eliminate a competitor, and competition is good for consumers
  • Based on what we know, it seems like Anbang is simply trying to diversify and globalize their investments, so they very well may let Starwood still run pretty independently
  • This could be either a good or bad thing, but if anything Anbang might have lower expectations of ROI than a publicly traded company in the US, given that it sure seems like they’re about diversifying their investments rather than simply getting the highest return possible

Well, unfortunately it looks like our hope of Anbang taking over Starwood won’t become a reality, as Anbang has withdrawn their offer for Starwood. Here’s a statement from Anbang, per CNBC:

“We were attracted to the opportunity presented by Starwood because of its high-quality, leading global hotel brands, which met many of our acquisition criteria, including the ability to generate consistent, long-term returns over time,” the consortium said. “However, due to various market considerations, the consortium has determined not to proceed further. We thank the Starwood board, management team and its advisors for their efforts and support throughout this process.”

Shares of both Marriott and Starwood stock fell today, which reflects how investors seem to feel about the news.

In theory another company could still try to beat Marriott’s offer in the coming days, though it seems unlikely.

Oh well, what can ya do? It has been fun to watch, at least.

Conversations (35)
The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.
Comment as a member

Membership is free and takes no more information than commenting as a guest. Earn status points for good contributions, and see fewer ads as your status grows.

Type your response here.

If you'd like to participate in the discussion, please adhere to our commenting guidelines. Anyone can comment, and your email address will not be published. Register to save your unique username and earn special OMAAT reputation perks!

  1. Loading comments…
Recent Comments
The latest from the OMAAT community.

The comments on this page have not been provided, reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any advertiser, and it is not an advertiser's responsibility to ensure posts and/or questions are answered.

Simon Diamond

Interesting look-in http://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-anbangs-curious-starwood-courtship-1459730791 No wonder they keep preferring Marriott. Wu Xioahiu calling last-minute, forcing people to change plans, but not showing proper financing on multiple occasions. Showing up just before Marriott was meant to close, with ability to show financing. Mr Wu coming to meetings with team of people, but not consulting them. Lack of vision other than expanding Sheraton brands in China. Second offer to counter Marriott was good enough it forced Starwood to consider. B/c of all that they insisted that Anbang agree to pay even if the Chinese regulators denied. They would have to pay up regardless. Yet, they couldn't prove financing that second time and after radio silence had their law firm announce they withdraw. Having advisors without consulting them or them even speaking is not too odd for a Chinese M&A deal, but it sounds like someone from CPC eventually said "No" and Mr. Wu lost in getting that changed. If they wanted to, they would have had financing; no way they add a pay-up clause regardless of approval without some assurances. The sporadic nature sounds like Mr Wu wanted it, but had to continually convince 'someone' along the way, leaving them to get things together last minute, until he got a hard stop.

0
‼ 0
DCS Diamond

@chancer -- The quote was not jumbled. It was repeated purposely for emphasis. This is quite simple. Rather than to keep treating us to your scatologically unsavory images of Hilton properties that are nothing more than a fictitious construct of your scata-filled imagination, just do yourself a favor and stop staying at Hilton properties! It's like: You: "Doctor, it hurts when I do this". Doctor: "Well, do not do that it won't hurt!" GOODBYE.

0
‼ 0
chancer Guest

@ DCS - FYI your quote is jumbled. Sorry, but not only is the image of encrusted feces at the Garden Inn Midtown East burned into my eyes, I have photos to help me remember in case I ever think about making a reservation there again. No need to "do better." I consider it doing people a favor letting them know to take a closer look at their hotel toilets, but if they only want to believe that a housekeeping visit means a clean room, they are free to park their behinds inches from previous guests' excrement, as are you.

0
‼ 0
DCS Diamond

@chancer: "...so many Hilton Hotels are crap but so many Hilton Hotels are crap, and I mean that literally": I am sure you mean it literally but you could be very wrong, just as I might be if I made the same claims about another chain. You gotta do better than that. Bottom line: the whole comment smells like the part of your anatomy that's quite likely doing the "thinking"... G'day.

0
‼ 0
chancer Guest

@ DCS - The Hhonors program may be "solid as a rock" but so many Hilton Hotels are crap, and I mean that literally. Garden Inn Midtown East had encrusted FECES on their toilet seats which isn't the only Hilton with lousy housekeeping. That sort of thing only happens at a hotel chain when management thinks they are sitting pretty. BTW I'm writing this from my turd-free toilet at the Sheraton Nuremberg.

0
‼ 0

Save posts to read later

Saving posts is a member feature. Become an OMAAT member to build a reading list you can come back to from any device.

Become a member
Meet Ben Schlappig, OMAAT Founder
5,883,136 Miles Traveled

43,914,800 Words Written

47,187 Posts Published